Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Gen 1 or LSX?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
  1. #1
    Flipper_1938's Avatar
    Flipper_1938 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 Seagrave
    Posts
    683

    Gen 1 or LSX?

     



    If you were starting from scratch, what would you build?

    It is going in a saturday night special hot rod. Shooting for 500 hp N/A ....with the option of spraying it for more.

  2. #2
    falconvan's Avatar
    falconvan is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Plymouth, 48,54 Heap
    Posts
    3,407

    LSX, no contest. This is undoubtably the best product GM performance parts has ever put out. Some day I will own one.

  3. #3
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    Definitely the LSx. I love my LS1 great power and drivability. Either get the LSX crate to build your own or start with a drop out. Best bang for the buck on a drop out is an LQ9 or LQ4 from a truck or SUV. What kind of car are you plnanning to put it in?

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  4. #4
    Geezer2's Avatar
    Geezer2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dunedin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1976 Cadillac Seville with 454 Chevy
    Posts
    421

    I agree with falconvan, the LS series are way better.
    Buying parts I don't need, with money I don't have, to impress people I don't like

  5. #5
    Flipper_1938's Avatar
    Flipper_1938 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 Seagrave
    Posts
    683

    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Cool
    Definitely the LSx. I love my LS1 great power and drivability. Either get the LSX crate to build your own or start with a drop out. Best bang for the buck on a drop out is an LQ9 or LQ4 from a truck or SUV. What kind of car are you plnanning to put it in?

    Pat
    It is going in a 1941 Dodge pickup.

    Are you also a fan of the L92 heads?

  6. #6
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    Quote Originally Posted by Flipper_1938
    It is going in a 1941 Dodge pickup.

    Are you also a fan of the L92 heads?
    Those seem to be the factory heads of choice, there are also a number of aftermarket companies selling prepped heads that really make some power.

    Surf on over to LS1Tech.com Lots of info there, plus there is a hybrids and conversion forum that will help you with your swap. Without that I would have been way longer and more expensive on mine. Very little that has not already been done by someone.

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  7. #7
    Flipper_1938's Avatar
    Flipper_1938 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Car Year, Make, Model: 47 Seagrave
    Posts
    683

    Are stock cranks and rods worth using? or is aftermarket stuff required?

  8. #8
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    A lot of guys ar using the stock cranks and rods and just changing the rod bolts. These are 6 bolt main blocks and they hold up pretty well. I have not dealt with modified versions though so best to ask that question over at LS1tech in the Internal engine forum. Lots of good reading over there.

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  9. #9
    mudbog42's Avatar
    mudbog42 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Florida for now
    Posts
    143

    LSX, I love my 5.3 powered 51 Chevy

  10. #10
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    LSX,LS I was wondering today what is the difference, and what would be the best model truck or car to be looking for something of the LSX motors.

  11. #11
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    The car motors are aluminum block, came in Corvettes starting in 97 and V-8 Camaros and Firebirds starting in 98. And in GTOs and Cadillac CTS-V until 2004. Then in 2005 the LS2 came along which is called Gen IV because of some subtle differences mostly in sensor and their locations. The 97-98 motors run good but have differences than the later models. Trucks started getting the motors in 99 with the 4.8 and 5.3 liter, These were iron blocks and I think in 2000 or 2001 started getting aluminum heads. 6.0 liter came in the 2500 and above trucks and then in the SUVs. The 6.0 are designated LQ4 and LQ9. The LQ9 is in the higher end SUVs and has higher compression. That's a very brief description. Mixed in there are the crate motors and the newer LS3 6.2 and the Hipo 5.7 LS6 and super high end 7 liter LS7.

    Hope that helps

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  12. #12
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    helps alot but one other question, is there a differnce in the lsx vs the ls blocks if any at all. and if so, waht about the ls 1 through 7 are those compatible. as like the earlier blocks.

  13. #13
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    LSX Bowtie Block (Standard Deck). 3.990" finished Siamese Cylinder Bores (ready to be honed to your specifications). 9.26" semi-finished standard Deck Height (ready to be decked to your specifications). Max 4.250" recommended Stroke. Capable of 364 to 482+ cid. Orange Powder Coat finish. Accepts all Gen III & IV LS Heads, Cranks, Cams, Etc. Approximate Finished Weight: 225 Lbs.

    Amazing what even a little reading can get me.

  14. #14
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    Good research! Depending on your budget and goals, the 6.0 truck engines seem to give the best bang for buck. They are cast iron block and wiegh about 80 pounds more than the aluminum block motors. The aluminum block motors won't take much of an over bore (max .005 on early models), the iron blocks will take more. The guys that are using power adders are mostly using the iron blocks. Based on your originally stated goals, I would look for a 6.0 either LQ4 or LQ9. But even the 5.3 motors will make good power. One of the car mags built one with an LS6 cam and not much else that was pumping 350+ hp at the wheels I think. Plus they still got good mileage and drivability.

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  15. #15
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    so in your earlier post pat you said higher end suv's for the 6.0 so the Cadilac Escalade, and or what else maybe the GMC Denali

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink