Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 283 with small journal 327 crank
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    average joe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    southern oregon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 Chevy Nova
    Posts
    8

    Smile 283 with small journal 327 crank

     



    Hello all,
    First time poster long time reader here. Thought i might pick your brain about building a 283 with a 327 crank. i have a 1964 283 and would like to increase the cubic inches. I believe this will make a 307. the engine would be going in a 69 chevy half ton truck with a turbo 400 and 373 gears. the truck is used primarily as a daily driver so gas mileage is the primary concern. I am currently running a stock 454 and getting around 6.5 mpg in town and 10 on the highway. I seldom tow or haul much that is very heavy. I welcome any ideas or suggestions.

  2. #2
    Hombre259's Avatar
    Hombre259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Out in The Country
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy 210-57 Chevy 2 dr wagon-48 Ford
    Posts
    374

    Dumb Butt has edited this post becuase "HE" I mean "ME" didn't realize what he was posting above his pay grade!!!!!

    Roland
    Last edited by Hombre259; 12-14-2008 at 10:28 PM. Reason: Because I'm Dumber than a post!!!!
    Protected people will never know or understand the intensity life can be lived at. To do that you must complettly and totally understand the meaning of the word "DUCK"

  3. #3
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I thought the DZ 302 was the 327 block with the 4" bore and the 283 crank with 3"stroke?????? Not a chebbie guy, but I believe the 327 crank is 3.250" stroke....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  4. #4
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    The SB Chevy 283 Block is standard 3.875" bore same size bore as a 307 L/J Block . The stock 283 uses the 3.000" Stroke crankshaft . By using the 3.250" Stroke Crankshaft and different pin height pistons Chevy made the 307 . How about your 283 bored 60+ over with 60 over 307 pistons and that 3.250" Crankshaft = 316ci Build . Not bad ? Or on some early 283's if they are check . They can be Punched out to a 4" bore and you could use standard 327 Pistons now you will have a S/J 327 Build .

  5. #5
    Mike P's Avatar
    Mike P is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SW Arizona
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Ply Valiant, 83 El Camino
    Posts
    3,834

    Roland I believe you are thinking of the a 283 crank in a 327 block which yields the "302"

    The other way around..... a standard bore 283 with a 327 crank yields 306.624 (307).

    Although I have never done this stroker build I have run a few slightly modified 307s, they produce torque but do not wind up.

    Personally I would not expect a huge mileage gain with the 307 maybe 3 or 4 MPG.

    I would take a guess and say that your current gas mileage is affected by 2 areas.... wind resistance (trucks have aerodynamics of a brick) and RPM. While you can't do much about the shape of the truck a gear change or addition of an overdrive would likely give you as good or better mileage than the small block swap.

    I’m sure what the interstate speeds are there but at 75 MPH and assuming a 31 inch tall tire what ever engine you run would be at 3032 RPM (plus a little bit for converter slippage).

    Changing to a 3.08 would drop the RPM to 2500, and leaving the 3.73 gears and installing a 700R4 would drop the RPM to around 2100 RPM.

    Unless you already have other plans for the 454 the 700R4 swap would be the way I would go. I believe it would give the biggest mileage gain and still be cheaper and easier than an engine build and swap.
    I've NEVER seen a car come from the factory that couldn't be improved.....

  6. #6
    Hombre259's Avatar
    Hombre259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Out in The Country
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy 210-57 Chevy 2 dr wagon-48 Ford
    Posts
    374

    Guys, Well what could I have been thinking !!! DUUUUUH That was one of those embarassing senior moments. DAMN

    Of course ----And I stand corrected----- I was referring to the 327 4" Block and the 3" 283 Crank........

    Roland
    Protected people will never know or understand the intensity life can be lived at. To do that you must complettly and totally understand the meaning of the word "DUCK"

  7. #7
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Hey, no biggie Roland!!!! Old age and CRS is a common condition around here!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  8. #8
    JeffB2's Avatar
    JeffB2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Phoenix
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1954 Ford Customline 5.0 & AOD
    Posts
    443

    Best bet!

     



    You can probably pick up a 305 or 307 cheaper than trying to upgrade the 283 and be ahead in many ways,you will have a large journal crank and rods which are stronger and a crank with a bolt on Harmonic balancer, a lot of 283's were pressed on.A 305 HO from a Camaro would be your best buy,there should be a fair amount out there for a good price since guys will swap for 350's and sell them cheap.

  9. #9
    rdobbs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    springfield
    Posts
    383

    just curious; I heard gm did not build many 307 engines..If true, why
    did they not build many? I have owned, 283, 305, 327,350, &454, but
    never a 307...rdobbs

  10. #10
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Cuz they were a pooch!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  11. #11
    average joe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    southern oregon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 Chevy Nova
    Posts
    8

    Thanks for the input guys. Me thinks i'll look for a set of 3.08 cogs and keep my current combo. Just gots to do something with that little 283 though. Hmmmm.

  12. #12
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    take the 283 bore it .060 get it up to 10:5 or 11:1 use a 270h or a 280h cam performer rpm air gap, 600 holley 373;s 391's have some fun, i love them little 283's this spring we are eyeballing 11.70's on the motor

  13. #13
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    It's tough to find affordable pistons that will yield 11.0:1 in a 292 with decent heads. Here's what I came up with just foolin' around on the DynoSim.
    283 bored 0.060"
    Keith Black hypers, KB166-060
    L31 Vortec heads, cut 0.040" for 58cc chambers. Stock 1.94/1.50 valves, springs and retainers matched to lift. Makes static compression ratio of 10.5:1. Heads are bone-stock except for springs and retainers and the 0.040" cut. You can rescue 'em out of a boneyard. Casting number 12558062 in a '96-'98 Chevy truck with 5700 Vortec motor. Look for a saw-tooth design on the front of the heads. Get the rail rockers and center bolt valve covers at the same time you're gettin' the heads.
    CompCams solid flat tappet cam. 12-221-5, grind 280B-8, 280/285, 242/250, 507/532, 108.
    Large tube stepped race headers
    Edelbrock RPM Vortec intake w/750 carb
    RPM HP TQ
    3000 201 252
    3500 253 380
    4000 312 410
    4500 372 434
    5000 424 446
    5500 457 436
    6000 489 428
    6500 502 406
    7000 507 380
    7500 505 354
    8000 495 325
    136 mph top speed @8000 w/4.88 gear, 28" tire. Use 3000+ stall converter with auto. Would be way more fun with a 4-spd/5-spd. I realize the original poster asked for a way to enlarge his 283 to pull a truck. This is not the motor to do that. This is a play-toy built the way Scooter might do it. I just wanted to dyno it and see what it looked like. Who says you can't make 500 hp out of a budget 283??? A guy might have to massage the domes a little to fit the chambers, but you'd still make 500 hp even if you dropped the SCR a couple of tenths. Disable the centrifugal and vacuum advance and lock it up at 34-36 degrees. Install a switch through a relay to disable the ignition while cranking, then flip the switch to ignition-on while the motor's spinnin'.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 12-17-2008 at 02:07 AM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  14. #14
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    and people say im dumb for using something smaller!!!!!out of 35 runs on this motor, its only lost head to head against a car 4 times, but if you count the breakout and reldight

  15. #15
    BigBoyzBadToyz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fordsville
    Posts
    7

    3.25 Crank

     



    Quote Originally Posted by tango View Post
    The SB Chevy 283 Block is standard 3.875" bore same size bore as a 307 L/J Block . The stock 283 uses the 3.000" Stroke crankshaft . By using the 3.250" Stroke Crankshaft and different pin height pistons Chevy made the 307 . How about your 283 bored 60+ over with 60 over 307 pistons and that 3.250" Crankshaft = 316ci Build . Not bad ? Or on some early 283's if they are check . They can be Punched out to a 4" bore and you could use standard 327 Pistons now you will have a S/J 327 Build .
    3.25 is a 327 crank and it does make a 307 ..307 & 283 have the same bore

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink