-
06-03-2009 08:17 PM #16
Yeh a set of 1 3/4's will be to big for that motor of course they'll bolt on but with that said dosent make them a good choice will give up alot of low and mid range power witch is were your going to live with this combo rpm wise. 1 5/8 will be just right
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
06-11-2009 11:50 AM #17
A good rule of thumb is to keep header pipe diameter as close to the exhaust valve diameter. Use the 1 5/8" unless you plan on over 500 hp.
-
07-29-2009 08:10 PM #18
Hey Tech. I have bought a set of rebuilt vortec heads from an engine rebuilder. I am now looking at cams and pistons. Which thumpr cam would you use or would you only use the one you suggested. Also, are the KB pistons the only ones you would use or are there any others to consider? And do you know how high a lift I can go with the vortec heads?
Thanks in advance, Brad.
-
07-30-2009 03:28 AM #19
OK, this is the hard way to do it, picking a cam and then setting the static compression ratio to fit the cam. There are way more cam choices than there are piston choices, but I'm trying to start with a Thumpr for you. Here is the cheapest 1.560" compression height piston I can find that has a reasonably wide, flat perimeter to make squish against the underside of the cylinder head and a properly sized dish to make the right static compression ratio with the Vortec heads.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/STL-H670CP30/
Production cylinder heads will usually pour a little larger than the published chamber volume. Here's how these pistons work out with different chamber volumes:
64 9.77:1
65 9.66:1
66 9.56:1
What I was trying to do is get a static compression ratio that would work with the middle of the road Mutha-Thumpr, #12-601-4 and generate a dynamic compression ratio that would be compatible with pump gas.
You want to cut the block deck height to 9.010" and use a GM 10105117 head gasket. That will put the piston deck height at 0.010" and the squish at 0.038".
Cam: 12-601-4 flat tappet hydraulic Mutha-Thumpr. Intake centerline 102 degrees ATDC, Exhaust centerline 112 degrees BTDC, Lobe Separation Angle 107 degrees. Intake lift 0.489", exhaust lift 0.476". Intake opens 15.5 degrees BTDC, intake closes 39.5 degrees ABDC, exhaust opens 56.5 degrees BBDC, exhaust closes 12.5 degrees ATDC.
http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...?csid=108&sb=0
Heads: Pin the rocker studs with this kit....
http://www.jegs.com/p/Mr-Gasket/Mr-G...49537/10002/-1
Must replace valve springs to use this cam. Can use conventional outer with spiral wound damper, but will probably have to cut the guide to a smaller diameter because the inner diameter of the damper will not clear the guide. Most popular would be to cut the guide to 0.530" for use with PC-type valve seals. Spring seats in the heads are cut to +/- 1.250".
Use these springs....(1.254" O.D.)
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-981-16/
And these 7 degree retainers....
http://www.summitracing.com/search/?...20742-16&dds=1
And these locks....
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-648-16/
Guide cutter....
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-4726/
Guide cutter arbor....
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-4732/
Heads, Plan B....
Use Comp beehive springs that require no cutting....
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-26981-16/
With these 7 degree retainers....
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-787-16/
And these locks....
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-648-16/
Rockers: Must use rail rockers unless you want to pull the pressed-in studs and machine the pads and tap the holes for screw-in studs and guide plates. You use one or the other, rail rockers with no guide plates or conventional rockers with guide plates. Using rail rockers with guide plates will break something. If you want to go with guide plates, forget the stud pinning kit I linked above. Wanna go cheap? Rescue stock 1.5 rail rockers from the boneyard. Ran this DynoSim with 600 carb and RPM intake....using a standard Performer will drop 38 hp....
RPM HP TQ
2000 139 362
2500 181 381
3000 230 402
3500 284 426
4000 335 439
4500 381 444
5000 415 436
5500 431 412
6000 419 367Last edited by techinspector1; 07-30-2009 at 03:37 AM.
-
07-30-2009 11:56 AM #20
Thanks Tech. How high a lift can I go with?
-
07-31-2009 12:02 AM #21
-
03-29-2010 11:07 PM #22
Hey Tech. I need some more help please. I have talked to a couple of local engine builders. I do value your advice though! I have purchased a comp cams H270 (PART #12-211-2) First, do you think I will have to modify the heads for this lift? Second, the one builder recommends Mahle hypereutectic pistons over the KBs. What do you think of them? Third, the other builder (builds stock car motors) says to use the pistons that are in the engine. He figues they are 10.5 to 1 as they have .100 domes. Is there a way to use a thicker head gasket with these pistons with the vortec heads to bring down the ratio?
Thanks
Brad
-
03-30-2010 11:43 AM #23
OK, first, let's bring everyone up to speed on this cam....
http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/Ca...x?csid=78&sb=0
Any competent cam grinder will tell you that you need a minimum of 0.050" clearance to prevent coil bind on the valve springs at max valve lift. That means that you should be able to insert a 0.010" feeler gauge blade between each of the 5 coil spaces in the spring with the valve at full lift. If you can do that with a valve lift of 0.470", go fo it. If not, you'll have to change springs. The other thing you need to check (and this is the most frequently given limit on Vortec heads) is the clearance between the bottom of the valve retainer and the top of the valve seal. Most cam grinders will suggest 1/16" to 1/8" clearance with the valve at full lift. If you have that much clearance with the 0.470" lift cam, go for it. If not, you'll need to change springs or do a ghetto grind on the bottoms of the retainers. Even at that, using the stock Vortec springs isn't gonna do much for you in a performance format. Seems I remember the "over the nose" pressure is something like 240 lbs, so they're gonna float the valves pretty easily if you wind the motor very tight.
Comp calls for spring numbers 981 or 983 with that cam, so heed what they are suggesting or wing it yourself. It's up to you. I gave you all the tool numbers earlier in this thread.
A 350 Chevy with 0.100" dome pistons and 64cc heads will make 11.80:1 static compression ratio. Better send that machinist back to school.Last edited by techinspector1; 03-30-2010 at 11:48 AM.
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
03-30-2010 06:48 PM #24
Thanks Tech. I will do an assembly of it and check out the clearances. I also was doubtful of the comp ratio of those pistons. Thanks for the input.
Brad
-
04-02-2010 09:19 AM #25
-
04-25-2010 12:30 AM #26
Hey guys. A new development here! Today I picked up a 1998 vortec 350 that has 2 new 906 heads( 1 hour run time !!!) with 2 slapping pistons for $500. Crank has some wear but will clean up. I have heard of some good things about building these engines. Should I be building this engine or continuing with the origional plan?
Thanks
Brad
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
You've not been around here for a while, Charlie, but when you were you had GREAT projects!! Happy Birthday!!
Happy Birthday Charlie Fisher!