Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 283 with cammel hump heads?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Rockerdude is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    2

    283 with cammel hump heads?

     



    I have a 63' C10 that from the engine casting number reads that it is a 283, and its got 3890462 casting number heads. I read some where that bigger valves in these heads dont exactly fit with the small bore of the 283. What am I looking at?

  2. #2
    HOTRODPAINT's Avatar
    HOTRODPAINT is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    tucson
    Posts
    3,043

    It's been a few decades since I did much SBC motor work, but I think it requires notching the top of the cylinders for valve clearance, if you have the 202 intake valves, but you'd better check it out with someone more knowledgeable. You may also have to have a large port intake.

  3. #3
    Rockerdude is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    2

    Anyone else?

  4. #4
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

    Id run it..
    Friends dont let friends drive fords!

  5. #5
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    The heads are on the engine, the engine runs???? What's your question??? That little 283 belongs in a nice, lightweight car with a manual transmission and deep gears, not trying to lug some big old truck around.... Takes torque to haul heavy weights.....a 283 just doesn't make much.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  6. #6
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    I would sell those heads and buy a set of 305 heads. They will fit a 283 and breathe very well. You don't need 2.02 valves in a 283. They will lose you a lot of torque.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  7. #7
    41willys's Avatar
    41willys is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Coralville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 willys coupe
    Posts
    282

    Not all 461 or 462 heads were 2.02/1.6.
    1.94/1.5 were standard. 1.94 will work fine on your 283.
    John

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink