Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Dual plane vs. Single plane intake
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    JonBoll's Avatar
    JonBoll is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Parker
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 Chevy Camaro, 350
    Posts
    21

    Dual plane vs. Single plane intake

     



    Hey fellas, just changed out the cam on my Camaro and am wondering what the major differences are between a dual and single plane intake. The motor in question is a 350, .040 over , gm crank currently has a Torker2 intake (single plane) topped with a holley 650 carb. The new cam has the following specifics
    Cam Style Hydraulic flat tappet
    Basic Operating RPM Range 1,600-5,400
    Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift 216
    Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift 216
    Duration at 050 inch Lift 216 int./216 exh.
    Advertised Intake Duration 272
    Advertised Exhaust Duration 272
    Advertised Duration 272 int./272 exh.
    Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.454 in.
    Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.454 in.
    Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.454 int./0.454 exh. lift
    Lobe Separation (degrees) 110
    Intake Valve Lash 0.000 in.
    Exhaust Valve Lash 0.000 in.

    Now with the previous more aggressive cam the Torker2 intake seemed to do well, with the new cam (installed yesterday) the engine feels a little less responsive on the low end. My understanding is that the dual plane is more for low end response, so I was wondering if it would behoove me to use the dual plane I have in the garage. I dont wanna waste my time pulling stuff out if there really is no difference hence I am here seeking the wisdom of those far more knowledgeable than I.

    Cam was broken in at 2500rpm for an hour with 30 weight oil and Comp cams break in additive. will be readjusting the valves tomorrow as I hear minor lifter noise after break in and an hours worth of driving. tends to get a little miss after a bit of driving and not sure what exactly that could be. its not constant though I did notice a little arcing of number 3 boot to header.
    Instead of providing Politicians with a key to the city; we'd be safer changing the locks.

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    With that low of an rpm range, better stick with a dual plane intake.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    JonBoll's Avatar
    JonBoll is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Parker
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 Chevy Camaro, 350
    Posts
    21

    Thanks Dave. I certainly dont plan to be racing this thing hence the cam choice. Does the dual plane offer a better low end response potential as well?
    Instead of providing Politicians with a key to the city; we'd be safer changing the locks.

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Yup, dual plane is a low rpm intake for torque. A single plane doesn't usually start working good til about 2800 rpm and up... Trades low end torque for top end horsepower... Dual plane is for sure the better choice for yours.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    JonBoll's Avatar
    JonBoll is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Parker
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79 Chevy Camaro, 350
    Posts
    21

    Thanks again Dave! Will change it out tomorrow for sure then. The 2800 rpm sounds about right on the current intake. I know I have to really feed it to get it going but somewhere close to 3k it wakes up. Thanks for your help
    -Peace-
    Instead of providing Politicians with a key to the city; we'd be safer changing the locks.

  6. #6
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    You're certainly welcome, Jon
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink