Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Another Cam Suggestion
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 27 of 27
  1. #16
    18436572's Avatar
    18436572 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Granbury
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Chop top
    Posts
    147

    Tech,
    I am amazed at the effort you show to people you dont even know. YOu must have spent 8 hours on these post. I am not even building a sbc and yet I copied these posts and saved them as a separate document. Whether this person uses your advice or not, I want to thank you for the excellent post.
    Many thanks!

  2. #17
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    TechInspector has a lot of good advice. If you decide against a roller cam, just make sure you add the appropriate zinc additives (EOS or other such products) to your oil and break it in properly. New oil formulations are not good for flat tappet cams. And IMO, the XE-274 is a little big for a 350 if you want to have a street-friendly driver.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  3. #18
    flanker1970 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    palm beach gardens
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1972 monte carlo 402
    Posts
    157

    Tech is very knowledgeable on this subject. I built a 383 based on his recipe and it screams. I used the comp hyd roller 286 magnum(230/230 @ .050)
    I have built many engines and one thing that I have discovered is that from the very beginning, you must really think long and hard about what really you intend for the car. Are you really going to put 10,000miles on it? does it have ac and other power accessories?
    As far as sound is concerned, I agree with tech. Hyd (flat tappet or roller) will never sound like the solid roller that I just put in a recent 427 ford build( 254@ .050) NEVER.
    It is not necessarily the camshaft itself that is the culpit for poor driveability (aside from low vacuum) It's the things that complement the camshaft requirements ie...high compression, high stall, lowgears ect...
    Comp created those thumper cams specifically for sound. I have put them on the desktop dyno and they inferior to other cams from a performance stand point.
    I probably will never install another flat tappet again. After the last wipeout, too $$$
    I like the sound of solid rollers as you can hear the valvetrain components clearly. Plus, solid rollers separate the fairweather corvette dorks from real muscle car enthusiasts!!!!!

  4. #19
    kool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    23

    WOW again techinspector1 !

    I can't say enough how much I appreciate this information you gave me and the time you've taken to put this info together for me.

    You've sold me on the hyd. roller set up. With my luck I'll screw something up and wipe out a cam/lifter then start kicking myself. I don't want to pull the engine and all the crap that goes with it to re-do what I tried so hard not to screw up.

    I'm going to study, make notes and search all the part numbers you gave me, (I really appreciate the links and part numbers).

    Again you clarified so much for me and I can't express enough for the time you took to help a complete stranger.

    I will keep this thread so I can refer to it often, and of course the other members that have also posted. I value all your opinions. You guys have seen a hell of alot more then I'll ever get to experience and thats your experience I must learn from.

    Like they say- "You get what you pay for, You pay for what you get"

    Sincerely thanks.

  5. #20
    kool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    23

    Hi Guys,

    Found these two cams, I will give you the numbers. This is what is hard for me to understand, so with the info earlier in this thread of my engine, car combo,
    basically-
    355, hyper pistons(d-cup), 9.0:1 comp., 3500 lb. car, 3.89:1 gears, 2200 stall.
    Other info in above posts, don't want to repeat too much.

    These two roller hyd.cams:

    #1-dur@.050 234/238 - adv. dur. 296/300 - 112 lobe sep. .539 int/.548 exh.

    #2-dur@.050 226/234 - adv. dur. 258/256 - 110 lobe sep. .525 int/.532 exh.

    With these specs what can I expect with these cams for a street engine, manners, sound, one hve more torque or hp than the other?

    Don't even know if this is a fair question.

    Thanks if anyone can help.

  6. #21
    fun4me is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    waveland
    Posts
    44

    I have a question about the valve adjustment. Techinspector1, you said to adjust the rocker arms 1/8 turn after all the slack is removed from the valvetrain(zero lash). I have always adjususted 1/2 turn except when using Competition Cams Pro Magnumroller lifters. The Pro Magnum is basicaly a race lifter. The rest of the Comp Cam line is 1/2 turn after zero lash. G.M. recommends 3/4 to 1 turn after zero lash. I'm just a little concerned why you would say to adjust the valves 1/8 turn without knowing which lifters are going into the engine.

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
    Loosen both adjusting nuts on both rockers on #1 cylinder until the rockers are loose on the studs. Have your friend hold his finger on the tip of one of them so that he is pinching the rocker arm down onto the tip of the valve, holding it tightly. Now, you grasp the pushrod for the rocker he is holding down and jiggle the pushrod up and down while using a socket wrench to slowly tighten down the rocker arm adjusting nut until all the slack is removed and you cannot move the pushrod up or down any longer. Be delicate here. This is not a strong-armed operation. You are simply taking all the slack out of the pushrod and getting the rocker adjusting nut very slightly tightened down against the trunnion of the rocker arm. Now, make 1/8 turn more on the adjusting nut.....1/8 turn.....45 degrees......OK, that valve is done. Now, move over to the other valve on #1 cylinder and repeat the operation.
    .

  7. #22
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    It was brought to my attention on another forum that there are some lifters that want only 1/8 turn. This is only the static adjustment anyway, just to get you in the ballpark to crank the motor and for the cam run-in. You are expected to do a hot lash after break-in and can set the preload anywhere you think is right. I have read lately that some fellows are using 1 1/2 turns after the slack is removed.

  8. #23
    fun4me is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    waveland
    Posts
    44

    Wow 1 1/2 turns. Maybe they should just use a solid lifter cam. Thanks for clearing that up.

  9. #24
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Cam #2 is the better choice but I would want a little more stall--at least 2400. Cam #1 is a little larger than you want with 9:1 compression. That cam would want at least 10:1 static compression to take advantage of the additional duration. In addition, you would need more stall, more in the area of 2800-3000. I think you would like the street manners better with cam #2. Cam #1 would be a better choice for a 383 or 400.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  10. #25
    kool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    23

    Thanks Lynn

    Cam -1 was used in 383 build with a 10:1 compression (Edelbrock 2201)
    Cam -2 was recommended to me by Howard Cams, gave them by combo info and is sending it out.

    I just find it hard to look at these numbers and be able to read what application it would fit, you apparently had no problem.

    Thanks!

  11. #26
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    It just like anything else--the more you study this stuff, the more you learn about it, and the more you can pass on to others. I suppose it has something to do with all the years I spent teaching.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  12. #27
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Post deleted by author.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 08-31-2010 at 02:33 AM.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink