Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Dyno Combo Results
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    kool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    23

    Dyno Combo Results

     



    Hi Guys/Gals.

    I've been working on a 355 engine and don't know anyone with a dynosim 5, apparently they are pretty accurate.

    Would someone be able to run my combo and see what comes up?

    350 + .030"
    Hyper d-cup piston with .018" dish
    Edelbrock E-Tec 170 heads (1.94 intake/ 1.55 exh.)
    64 cc- should be 9.0:1
    Howard Cam -hyd. retro roller
    .525 int/.532 exh.- dur@.050 226/234 -LSA 108
    1.5 roller rockers
    Edel. airgap intake
    Holley 650 dbl. pump
    1-5/8" headers

    Thats about it, going to be for the street, nothing outrageous.
    Wanted something with bottom end to play with.

    Thanks, if anyone could help me out.

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by kool View Post
    Hi Guys/Gals.
    I've been working on a 355 engine and don't know anyone with a dynosim 5, apparently they are pretty accurate.
    Would someone be able to run my combo and see what comes up?
    350 + .030"
    Hyper d-cup piston with .018" dish
    Edelbrock E-Tec 170 heads (1.94 intake/ 1.55 exh.)
    64 cc- should be 9.0:1
    Howard Cam -hyd. retro roller
    .525 int/.532 exh.- dur@.050 226/234 -LSA 108
    1.5 roller rockers
    Edel. airgap intake
    Holley 650 dbl. pump
    1-5/8" headers
    Thats about it, going to be for the street, nothing outrageous.
    Wanted something with bottom end to play with.
    Thanks, if anyone could help me out.
    Couple of things to fix first.
    Pistons: If you're talking about KB D-cups, they are 18cc (eighteen cubic centimeters), not 0.018" (eighteen thousandths of an inch).
    Howards cam: I can't find this grind. I need to make sure on the LSA in order to figure the valve timing figures to enter into the DynoSim. Most of Howard's cams are ground on a 112 LSA, not 108. I have not seen a Howard's retrofit for a small block with the figures you have shown here. Where did they come from? Can you give me a link?
    Carburetor: Why the double pumper? Are you planning to use a loose torque converter? 3000+ stall? Car would make better fuel mileage with a vacuum secondaries carb, would make same top end hp and work better if you're using a converter tighter than 3000.
    Intake manifold: Car will make more useable power with a taller intake manifold such as the Edelbrock RPM AirGap Vortec #7516 in the range of 1500-6000.
    Do you have any of the parts bought yet?
    Last edited by techinspector1; 11-06-2010 at 11:47 AM.

  3. #3
    kool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    23

    Oops,

    The cam is #110325 @ 110 LSA, I took wrong info from 110325-08
    Called Howard Cams and thats what he said I would like for a heavy car.

    http://www.howardscams.com/index.php...=193&Itemid=37

    Piston is -18cc not .018"
    Double pumper- because thats what I have for now, can always change (easy bolt-on)
    Edelbrock RPM AirGap Vortec #7516 to match heads

    These parts are already bought and paid for

    Thanks techinspector1
    Last edited by kool; 11-06-2010 at 02:03 PM.

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    RPM HP TQ
    2000 142 374
    2500 180 379
    3000 229 401
    3500 285 427
    4000 335 440
    4500 375 438
    5000 403 424
    5500 410 390
    6000 379 331
    Peak volumetric efficiency 93.0% @4500
    Peak BMEP 186.5 @4000
    Edelbrock used these heads with a little different cam and a little more compression to make 435/435.

  5. #5
    kool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    23

    Thank You techinspector1

    I appreciate the time, dynosim 5, pretty accurate you think?

  6. #6
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by kool View Post
    Thank You techinspector1

    I appreciate the time, dynosim 5, pretty accurate you think?
    I always factor the heads by .95 from the published flow numbers, just to try to be more realistic. The hard-core dyno pulls I have been able to simulate come in around 2% plus or minus.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink