Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Stroker SBC's using 5.6 400 rods
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Stroker SBC's using 5.6 400 rods

     



    .030 or .040 over 350 block with using the over sized 350 piston and a 3.75 stroke and the stock 400 rods which are 5.6.Comments or input??

    Yes it is kind of the old school of doing things.
    Good Bye

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by 1gary View Post
    .030 or .040 over 350 block with using the over sized 350 piston and a 3.75 stroke and the stock 400 rods which are 5.6.Comments or input??

    Yes it is kind of the old school of doing things.
    Most fellows talk it down because of rod angularity which puts more force on the piston skirt against the cylinder wall and the other problem of crank counterweight to piston skirt clearance, but hey, the GM engineers designed the darned thing originally with those short rods. I wouldn't be so concerned personally about the angularity, but you have to clearance for the skirt to counterweight thing. I have carved piston skirts for clearance on my personal builds before and found that if I get the weight the same on all of the pistons, it works out fine. There may be some interference between some lobes of the cam and some of the rod bolts. Either grind on the bolts or use a reduced base circle cam for clearance. You don't need much clearance, just check it on your mock-up with the tip of a tie-wrap. Also, there may be a little interference at the pan rail with the big end of the rod, but a little grinding will take care of that. Again, use the thin tip of a tie-wrap to check clearance. A miss is as good as a mile. I'm sure you know you'll have to reduce the main bearing journal diameters on the crank also. As far as the short rod making less power than a longer rod, Iskenderian says it just ain't so. He says that because the piston parks for an instant longer at the bottom with a shorter rod, you can leave the intake valve open another 1-2 degrees and pack the cylinder a little better to make more power than you could with a longer rod. Personally, I have never measured the difference, I just lean on the experts. Longer rod, the piston parks for an additional instant at the top of the bore. Shorter rod, the piston parks for an additional instant at the bottom of the bore.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 08-17-2012 at 10:25 PM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    yep you can do it but why? by the time you pay to have the crank mains ground down you can buy a new crank$180 that fits for about the same as a regrind. the time you pay to recon the short rods.new 5.7 are less then 190.a set new .claimer pistons that fit are 200. now if you get the machine shop work for free or near free then do it . it was done at one time as there was no parts like there is now as for the pistons the CH is the same as the 350 .but you may not find a cheap piston that would clear the counter weight of the crank so there alot of pissing around when its really not needed .but yes it was done and can still be just going to cost as much as if you pickup a claimer crank assemblie
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  4. #4
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    What I have been reading about is guys buying stroker cranks and hanging 400 rods/350 pistons off them.

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by 1gary View Post
    What I have been reading about is guys buying stroker cranks and hanging 400 rods/350 pistons off them.
    Yeah, if you're absolutely broke and have a buddy at a machine shop who will cut the 400 mains for free, this approach should work out for you.
    Here's the flip side: I have a great deal of respect for Pat and will have to agree with him on his take on this. Depending on the parts you use to build your 383, you could easily double the hp/torque of the 350 that you start with. Do you really want to do that with 40 year old parts?

    Scat makes a cast STEEL 3.750" crank that is under 200 bucks.....
    Here's the one for 2-piece seal and external balance....
    SCAT Engine Components 910375 - Scat Cast Crankshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com
    Use a 400 damper and flexplate
    Here's a decent set of rods, I'm sure Pat could do better, but here's a set that's affordable anyway....
    5140 I-Beam Rods, Chev SB (LJ), 5.700", Press Pin-Competition Products
    I couldn't find any decent pistons, but Pat probably has some on the shelf.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i get flyer.s all the time the claimer pistons . a good way to go the new speed pro hiper is nice for the money .as for the crank regrind i do not have a crank grinder but it cost over 120. for a re grind so i would bet it would cost me 170 just to re grind a old gm 400 crank that has seal cut in it? and has a unknown history?? not worth it.. the way i see it even if the crank was free. yes some 350 pistons may clear and some may not .not much fun finding this out after you buy them they do not clear ?
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 08-18-2012 at 06:28 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  7. #7
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    I still have my .030 roller block Howards crank,5.7 Scat rod.Icon piston.The next one will be a LS series engine for me.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink