Thread: head upgrade disappointment
-
09-03-2012 07:43 PM #46
Perhaps, but I have no interest in introducing burnt gases into the system to reduce the charge density. If you must run EGR from an emissions standpoint, then fine. But if you don't, then the whole contraption is mis-engineered in the first place if you have to use EGR to make it work.Last edited by techinspector1; 09-03-2012 at 07:46 PM.
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
09-03-2012 07:48 PM #47
There are some ways to figure it. Several have figured it fore me in a couple different ways on the 302 which came out between 11.6 to 12.5 static (truely its just short of 9.0). This engine was built to embrace everything I have learned to keep air speed up. In many builds I have done it and its like having a couple lbs of boost.
-
09-03-2012 07:48 PM #48
-
09-03-2012 08:04 PM #49
EGR is mostly for cruse conditions to enable advances in timing similar to the old days vaccum advance units of 15 to 25*. Dosent effect performance that much. Usally its shut down aroud 75% load or more. Its also come a long way since it was introduced.
-
09-03-2012 08:35 PM #50
-
09-03-2012 08:40 PM #51
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
09-04-2012 07:11 AM #52
The caculations are not all that inacurate as it nailed it on most builds. However most have less dynamic than static.
In a nut shell it has to due with selecting componets that complement each other as well as possible and or modifing them to do so.
Would need a new topic started on it.
-
09-04-2012 07:17 AM #53
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel