Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By t-top havoc
  • 1 Post By jerry clayton

Thread: Another Cam Selection Question!
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    drofdar is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    fresno
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy
    Posts
    171

    Another Cam Selection Question!

     



    We're putting together a 283 for my girlfriends T-Bucket Bracket Car. I've heard it's easy to over cam the smaller cube 283, and wanted to check with the SBC guru's here. Comp Cam recommends their 12-238-2: 218/224@.050 Lift .462/.469 110LSA.
    Car has T350 trans - no trans brake. She holds foot brake, and mashes throttle on green to flash convertor, which is stock. Leaves it in drive, for consistency. Big Hoosier tires 4:56 gear. Looking for low end torque and something that pulls up to 5500rpm. Suggestions welcomed!

  2. #2
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    how about a stock cam from a 90s vortec or LT except you will need a electric fuel pump

  3. #3
    Scooting's Avatar
    Scooting is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Rio Rancho
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1940 Ford Sedan
    Posts
    537

    Jerry, help me to understand, why would a stock vortec cam require an electric fuel pump on a 283 with a carb? Not being a smart a**, just wondering why?

  4. #4
    t-top havoc is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Streator,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 87 Camaro
    Posts
    347

    There is no cam eccentric for the manual fuel pump
    Last edited by t-top havoc; 01-10-2014 at 02:38 PM. Reason: cam ...
    rspears likes this.

  5. #5
    drofdar is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    fresno
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy
    Posts
    171

    Car does have electric fuel pump/water pump. Not being a cam scientist, I wonder why, or what the specs are that make the 90's vortec or LT cam useful for this application? Never heard of this swap before.

  6. #6
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    you have a 283 sbc

    a cam from a 350 will be bigger--------

    The vortec/LT cams are hyd roller cams, and they run smooth, bottom end torque and will rev up pass 6000 without any flat spots--------

    good milage, smokes tires
    NTFDAY likes this.

  7. #7
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,174

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post
    .....a cam from a 350 will be bigger--------
    Jerry,
    When you say "...will be bigger..." that means it will have more lift, plus longer duration on both intake and exhaust to feed the greater volume flow of the 350 compared to the 283, right?
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  8. #8
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    well sort of-maybe------------

    A cam that is pretty radical for a 283 would be pretty mild in a 600 inch motor---------

    and going the other way, a cam from a 350 would be more robust in a 200 incher-------

    his car----foot brake, stock converter, big tire, 456 gear---running in drive---------

    and he probably can find one for free so will just have to do lifters outta pocket

  9. #9
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,174

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post
    well sort of-maybe------------

    A cam that is pretty radical for a 283 would be pretty mild in a 600 inch motor---------

    and going the other way, a cam from a 350 would be more robust in a 200 incher-------

    his car----foot brake, stock converter, big tire, 456 gear---running in drive---------

    and he probably can find one for free so will just have to do lifters outta pocket
    Just trying to clarify, Jerry, so that someone who doesn't understand cam details knows what "bigger" means in normal terms seen on a cam card.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  10. #10
    NTFDAY's Avatar
    NTFDAY is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 Mustang, 76 Corvette
    Posts
    5,379

    Roger, the 30/30 I have was pretty radical in the 265, but rather tame in the 400 and it busted a valve spring in the 400 somewhere between 6 and 7 grand.
    Ken Thomas
    NoT FaDe AwaY and the music didn't die
    The simplest road is usually the last one sought
    Wild Willie & AA/FA's The greatest show in drag racing

  11. #11
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,174

    Quote Originally Posted by NTFDAY View Post
    Roger, the 30/30 I have was pretty radical in the 265, but rather tame in the 400 and it busted a valve spring in the 400 somewhere between 6 and 7 grand.
    Ken,
    I understand what you're saying. The only things that one can change in a cam are the lift, duration, overlap and advance/retard relative to TDC, right? So doesn't it infer that a "bigger" cam for a specific engine, say the 283, is going to have more duration, more overlap, and perhaps more lift than the "milder" cam, or am I overlooking something basic? Of course the bigger engine or performance heads for the 283 will have bigger valves to breath better, but I'm just trying to clarify the understanding of the cam numbers. This is not a big deal, but sometimes we throw around terms that are second nature, not thinking that the guy asking the question may not be so well versed in how to spec a part, like a cam.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  12. #12
    NTFDAY's Avatar
    NTFDAY is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 Mustang, 76 Corvette
    Posts
    5,379

    Since my understanding of cam numbers is not the greatest I will leave that up to someone who knows how to explain it. Hopefully Jerry, Pat, or tech will come along and give a better explanation than I ever could. I just know how that particular cam reacted in two different engines, but trying to explain it is definitely out of my pay grade.
    Ken Thomas
    NoT FaDe AwaY and the music didn't die
    The simplest road is usually the last one sought
    Wild Willie & AA/FA's The greatest show in drag racing

  13. #13
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    OKKKKKKKKKKK
    there is a difference between flat tappet and rollers in that on a flat tappet setup, the cam to lifter contact is a line tangent to the lobe/tappet and the line moves across the face of the lifter---- on a roller set up that is a constantly changing contact point/angle as you have two curved objects getting friendly---------
    On a flat tappet cam you are limited by the edge of the lifter reaching a point where it would hook the edge into the cam(sorta like a garden hoe into the dirt as you scraped it across the surface------

    On a roller setup that is a constantly changing line angle with no hook and it allows a much faster opening rate which allows the valves to open much faster to there max and with the radius of the lifter roller allows it to stay near max opening much longer where a flat will go up there and slow down stop and then start lowering the valve sooner

    These are factors why the cam companies use .050 from base circle to be a measuring point for the cam cards numbers
    A roller cam can open the valve so fast that we have to watch for tappet flying off the cam nose as the deceleration near full open occurs while on a flat its necessary to run really high spring seat preasures just to keep the valve from bouncing----------

  14. #14
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,174

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post
    OKKKKKKKKKKK
    there is a difference between flat tappet and rollers in that on a flat tappet setup, the cam to lifter contact is a line tangent to the lobe/tappet and the line moves across the face of the lifter---- on a roller set up that is a constantly changing contact point/angle as you have two curved objects getting friendly---------
    On a flat tappet cam you are limited by the edge of the lifter reaching a point where it would hook the edge into the cam(sorta like a garden hoe into the dirt as you scraped it across the surface------

    On a roller setup that is a constantly changing line angle with no hook and it allows a much faster opening rate which allows the valves to open much faster to there max and with the radius of the lifter roller allows it to stay near max opening much longer where a flat will go up there and slow down stop and then start lowering the valve sooner

    These are factors why the cam companies use .050 from base circle to be a measuring point for the cam cards numbers
    A roller cam can open the valve so fast that we have to watch for tappet flying off the cam nose as the deceleration near full open occurs while on a flat its necessary to run really high spring seat preasures just to keep the valve from bouncing----------
    All very good information, Jerry, but rather than getting into the differences between flat and roller cam profiles I would think it would be more informative to stick with the differences between mild and wild only on roller cams, since we all know that today's oils make the use of a flat tappet cam questionable at best. That said, perhaps what you were saying back in post #6 is that the new vortech/LT cam is "bigger" compared to the old flat tappet cam that was in the 283 before, apples & oranges because the profiles are so much different as you explained above, and like you point out, switching over to the roller requires higher spring pressures to keep things together.

    I thought it was a simple question, trying to give drofdar a better understanding about what was being stated, but I guess it was not simple. Sorry for hi-jacking the thread, drofdar, I'm done.
    Last edited by rspears; 01-10-2014 at 02:35 PM.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink