Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 327 Questions
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    1bad914 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek
    Posts
    11

    327 Questions

     



    First off I'm a complete newbie to SBC's! I've built and restored Porsches and VW's for 25 plus years and have now decided to try an SBC rebuild.

    I have the opportunity to buy a 1967 327 that is complete. It came from a 1967 Impala that had 67K original miles on it. My application is best served by the higher revving lower torque of the 327(?).

    My question is: if I leave it alone and just rebuild it, what would the aproximate HP be? I don't want to exceed 300hp for my application.

    The only possible upgrade I am considering is aluminum heads, for lower weight. I have a ton more questions but will save those for another day.

    What should I pay for this motor, it is complete form carb to pan?

    Thanks
    Randy

  2. #2
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,876

    These engines were factory rated anywhere from 200 to 350 hp depending on cam, induction, heads, comp ratio, and exhaust. In other words, the usual stuff. Remember though, those were gross rather than net hp numbers.

    If you go the aluminum head route, you'll likely end up with heads that flow well. So a mild cam, and modest induction should keep you under 300. Of course, this is a Levi's dyno rating.

    If you want reving, and this is a small journal cranked engine ('67 was a transition year), you could put in a 283 crank for a shorter stroke.

    Pay as little as possible. Core values vary around the country, and there could be a "muscle era" factor here, even though it's a small block, but certainly less than $500.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  3. #3
    1bad914 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek
    Posts
    11

    Thanks Bob, I know it has double hump heads, whatever that means. I have heard of others putting in a 283 crank, I will try to maintain this in it's original format for cost reasons.

    This is going to be an adventure for me, any single book that you or anyone could recommend, I have heard the Vizard book is good.

    I am hoping to be able to do this with out boring, I'll know when I tear it down.

    Any other advice for a newbie will be devoured and digested!
    Last edited by 1bad914; 05-19-2004 at 10:45 AM.

  4. #4
    Troglodyte's Avatar
    Troglodyte is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    gig harbor,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chev Convert, 62 Stude GT Hawk, 64 Ve
    Posts
    305

    Trouble with those camel hmp heads is.........could be 300 hp or up th 375 hp engine.......my Vette was a 64 with injection,had these heads and rated 375 hp,,for old technology, they were great heads and flowed great...202 valves helped with the breathing.Don't think you can go too wrong with those heads, altho I would put in screw in studs for longer life.

  5. #5
    NTFDAY's Avatar
    NTFDAY is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 Mustang, 76 Corvette
    Posts
    5,379

    If you don't want the heads I'm sure you can find someone to take them off your hands.
    Ken Thomas
    NoT FaDe AwaY and the music didn't die
    The simplest road is usually the last one sought
    Wild Willie & AA/FA's The greatest show in drag racing

  6. #6
    1bad914 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek
    Posts
    11

    Thanks for the assistance. I am planning on having the block boiled/cleaned whatever, and I think I will have to have the valves upgraded for unleaded fuels. Will most machine shop magniflux a block? Again, all my experience is with Porches and VW's. I'm sure someone would gladly take the heads off my hands, I don't have the motor in my hands yet, but am afraid that it may have the 2.02 valves, which will drive the hp up. I know most of you are saying "WHO CARES" but my application is limited. If you care to know I'm installing this motor in a 1974 Porsche 914. I know it's not a Rod, but it's heart is in the right place.

    On another note, have any of you followed the latest trend in VW land, the Rat Rod look, http://socalook.com/socalook.shtml I think that it is interesting to see this look hit the VW world, it is becoming very popular. Sorry if this is off topic, I just thought it was interesting.

    Randy

  7. #7
    327,JET's Avatar
    327,JET is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    milton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 76 Nova
    Posts
    229

    327 Porche

     



    If you stick to a high torque,short duration hydraulic camshaft it should keep the power down. Also a good dual plane intake should keep thing's in the lower R.P.M. range. Probably just where you want it.You should be able to keep it in the H.P. range you need. Good luck with your Porche ,love to see some picture's when you finish it.

  8. #8
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    It has been said that American Hot Rods evolved out of the desire of Americans for European Sports car performance prior to Corvettes and the early T-bird. Now you are going the other way and I am familiar with putting Aluminum 215 cu. in. GM engines in MGs. However you have started an argument within my head as to what will result. The weight given for a 914 on one site is 2890 pounds while others claim lower weights down to 2000 pounds and with 4 cyl engines 0-60 times as low as 4 sec are quoted on some sites touting 914s. My question is estimating my 0-60 times for a '29 Ford roadster ('glass replica) with a mild 350 estimated at 250-280 HP on the GM rating scale later than '72. I have been told that the '72 and later H.P. values are about 50 lower due to measuring the H.P. at the tail shaft and with an alternator while the earlier values were measured on a bare engine driving only the water pump, oil pump and distributor. Thus the interesting picture you show above might be rated at 250 H.P. (??) on the new scale. I guess the secret to low 0-60 times for the 914 is in the transmission?? I just checked the 0-60 time measured for the famous "Magoo '29 Roadster" (HR Rod & Custom No. 11) and he gets 6.52 sec without fenders using a hi-po 327 and auto-3-speed. Thus with non-aerodynamic fenders and the added weight of the fenders I guess I will be lucky to get 7 sec with a 2200 pound roadster with a 350/TH350/2.79 rear?? Admittedly you have an advantage with a 4-speed but what do you expect to get for 0-60 with the 327? (Just bench racing while I wait for parts).

    Best Wishes,
    Don Shillady
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder

  9. #9
    suedeplymouth's Avatar
    suedeplymouth is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Lakewood
    Car Year, Make, Model: '64 ranchero
    Posts
    253

    Originally posted by 1bad914

    On another note, have any of you followed the latest trend in VW land, the Rat Rod look, http://socalook.com/socalook.shtml I think that it is interesting to see this look hit the VW world, it is becoming very popular. Sorry if this is off topic, I just thought it was interesting.

    Randy
    Awesome link, I saw that chopped bug before, its just as bad ass now as it was then.

  10. #10
    1bad914 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek
    Posts
    11

    Good dialogue Don,
    The weight of a 914 is 2290 give or take a pound or two. The 0-60 times are real and have been documented heavily amoungst the 914-V8 community. These are actual figures from people that have done the conversions. My reason for the conversion is $$. There are three main ways to make the anemic 914 go fast. Build-up the stock motor large dollars, I have done it before and it is not cheap. Option two is a conversion to a 911 flat six, even more expensive. Number three is the SBC Conversion, the least expensive out of the bunch. There are other less popular conversions, but these three are the ones seen the most. I have the motor, I can sell the Porsche motor to fund the conversion, so my out of pocket expenses will be fairly small. So this is a low-budget fun car. Plus it handles like a go cart. This is a pic of my last one, it had a hi-po Porsche motor in it. Fun, but no where near the fun of the SBC.

  11. #11
    Ed Ducey is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Morgan Hill
    Car Year, Make, Model: 72 Porsche 914 w/327 V8
    Posts
    3

    Just for reference, I have a 72 Porsche 914 with a professionally built 300HP 327-V8 driving a stock 901 gearbox. Car is 'normal' with the exception of GT flares and will do Oh 2 60 in just shy of 5 seconds.

    Also for the record, I'm going to modify the engine to include a steel 283 crank and double hump heads to increase the rev range as well as the horsepower.

    Lastly, start searching for an H / 19:32 gear which you will need for 5th - move current 5th to 4th and current 4th to 3rd. Don't use 1st at all.

    Good luck ... Ed

    PS If you want to sell those double humps, let me know ... what state are you in - besides confused !!!

  12. #12
    1bad914 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek
    Posts
    11

    Ed,
    Thanks for the reference. I've decided to keep the double hump heads for now. I'm in Michigan. Do you have a RH conversion or something else. What radiator setup did you use? Lot's of questions. To keep the post on topic, I have heard that the 283 crank was a great addition. How is you gearbox holding up to 300 hp? Where would I find that 19:32 gear. How much do you drive yours? I plan on driving it daily in the summer!

    Randy

  13. #13
    Ed Ducey is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Morgan Hill
    Car Year, Make, Model: 72 Porsche 914 w/327 V8
    Posts
    3

    Conversion was 1st done in 1978, well before any of the conversion gurus started biz ... a little of RSH and a little of Jaide.

    Radiator is from an air conditioned 69 Camaro Z28 - works great with the right fan ( Single 2800 CFM puller ).

    Gearbox is just now, after 17 years, starting to give out - the intermediate plate is going. Will replace as soon as I get my hands on an aluminum intermediate plate that I've ordered and a line on that 19:32 H gear. These are tough to find but worth the search - or use an HA !!!

    It's a daily driver but mostly around town due to the lack of an H gear.

    Hope you enjoy yours 1/2 as much as I enjoy mine !!!

  14. #14
    1bad914 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek
    Posts
    11

    Wow, you must have been a pioneer. I thought about the Camaro rad, but by the time I find one and have it re-cored or checked and then fab all the sheet metal around it I could have bought the RH version. They tell you the Camaro rad will not cool 300hp, I knew it would. they just want you to buy thiers. There is another company (Desert Hybrids) that I've been thinking about using. It will be a blast to drive. Where are you located.

    Randy

  15. #15
    Ed Ducey is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Morgan Hill
    Car Year, Make, Model: 72 Porsche 914 w/327 V8
    Posts
    3

    Located in the San Jose, CA area.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink