Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Best Wheel and tire size for a 32 HighBoy
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38
  1. #16
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    That old saying "opinions are like body orifices, everyone has one and all of them stink but mine" applies here. However, there is some common points for a fenderless car. There are maybe five different "looks" and each look has its own "perfect" traits.

    One thing that stands out in the pictures is that the "better" looks have the tire concentric to the rear reveal. Therefore, part of that equation is having the tire diameter chosen with the reveal-to-ground distance in mind. This is especially illustrated by Bib's picture that has a really nice concentricity. Older lakes racers had nice concentricity.

    The other feature that seems to be common is the tire to body gap. Most of the accepted "good" looks have this gap tightened instead of having the tires hang out like a Hot Wheels car.

    The newer low profile tires are a challenge with the big wheels since the tire sidewall gets really skinny and makes certain wheels look strange and out of proportion. This is especially true when the front tire is a 40 series and the back tire a 65 series.....the sidewall on the front seems even thinner. Since a low profile tire is made to be stiff and have the suspension tuned softer to give the ride quality, the setup of these tires is probably tougher......not wrong but certainly a challenge.

    All of this means that a wheel and tire combo on one deuce highboy looks good but it looks weird on another deuce highboy. I have found that we will probably buy several sets of wheels (ouch) and tires before we get our look "right" for our particular car.....and you almost gotta do the wheels and tires last.

    mike in tucson

  2. #17
    Jerilynne1965's Avatar
    Jerilynne1965 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    :)
    Car Year, Make, Model: 3 Pontiac T/A's, 1965 Ford F-100
    Posts
    447

    I agree with Troy here...I don't know anything about what a rod should or shouldn't be...but I know what I like...and so far all of the examples you guys have posted look fantastic...Why can't it be a matter of preference on a car...?

    I was just looking at a lavender 32 Phaeton (I don't think I spelled that right) in a magazine...geez...I like lavender...but it just looked wierd to me...But who cares? If that's what trips this guys trigger...it's his car (or hers as the case may be)...

    By the way Resin Addict ~ Weclome to the boards Hope to see ya at some cruise in's or something this spring and summer...
    You miss 100% of the shots you never take

  3. #18
    Jerilynne1965's Avatar
    Jerilynne1965 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    :)
    Car Year, Make, Model: 3 Pontiac T/A's, 1965 Ford F-100
    Posts
    447

    Re: Hey

     



    Originally posted by dangeroustoy
    If I remember correctly my rear tires are 29 inches tall... hahahaha, I guess it is just another boring street rod (thanks TravisB)...

    Dave Brisco
    Dave ~ Your rod is anything BUT Boring
    You miss 100% of the shots you never take

  4. #19
    dangeroustoy's Avatar
    dangeroustoy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy Roadster
    Posts
    677

    Thank you very much Jeri...

    I was trying to give ole TravisB a poke in the ribs!!!
    It is all in fun...

    Dave Brisco
    Last edited by dangeroustoy; 03-03-2005 at 10:07 AM.

  5. #20
    TravisB's Avatar
    TravisB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1962 ChevyII,1964 MalibuSS,1966 Chevelle
    Posts
    118

    Last edited by TravisB; 03-03-2005 at 10:17 AM.

  6. #21
    dangeroustoy's Avatar
    dangeroustoy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy Roadster
    Posts
    677

    Humm.....

     



    Trav you will have to refresh my memory on that one... Sure it was me?...

    Dave Brisco

  7. #22
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    trav ,
    that was my comment , not daves .

    sorry we hijacked someones post
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  8. #23
    TravisB's Avatar
    TravisB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1962 ChevyII,1964 MalibuSS,1966 Chevelle
    Posts
    118

    Last edited by TravisB; 03-03-2005 at 10:18 AM.

  9. #24
    dangeroustoy's Avatar
    dangeroustoy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy Roadster
    Posts
    677

    Originally posted by kennyd
    trav ,
    that was my comment , not daves .
    Now I feel like I missed out on something!!!

    Sorry guys just having some fun!!!

    Dave Brisco

  10. #25
    kennyd's Avatar
    kennyd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    nw arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1961bubbletop,1967 chevelle conv.33 road
    Posts
    530

    his nova sit so high , i thought it should have a transfer case .
    get it 4x4
    yes i drove ,the trailer didnot drive it's self
    FATGIRLS ARE LIKE MOPEDS , FUN TO RIDE JUST DONT LET YOUR FRIENDS SEE YOU ON THEM

  11. #26
    TravisB's Avatar
    TravisB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1962 ChevyII,1964 MalibuSS,1966 Chevelle
    Posts
    118

    THIS IS TRUE

  12. #27
    Ronbo's Avatar
    Ronbo is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Gresham
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford 3 window coupe
    Posts
    48

    tires, OK now wheels

     



    what backset are you using?

  13. #28
    Hotrod Roger is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Charleston
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1932 Ford Tudor
    Posts
    14

    Resin Addict: I am in the same situation- I am building a 32 Tudor sedan as a highboy and I'm trying to determine the correct tire and wheel combo. You have already received several good suggestions. I will add a couple of other things to keep in mind. As mentioned, highboys need tall rear tires in order to match the radius of the rear fender well. If you run the same diameter front and rear wheels, say 165/60x15's on the front and 275/70x15's on the rear, the tall sidewall on the rear tire dwarfs the wheel, where as the short side wall on the front makes the wheel look larger than the rear one. This is why you need to run at least one inch larger in the rear. As far as distance from the body- keep a minimum of 2" between the body and the tire to allow for body/axle movement. I am still trying to decide narrow or wide, whitewalls or black, steelies or billet? Decisions, decisions...

  14. #29
    resin addict's Avatar
    resin addict is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford 3 window Coupe
    Posts
    101

    Thanks for all the great replys, and the pictures. I'm getting a lot of good advice, and really appreciate it. Sounds like 29-30" for the rears seems to be the concensus.
    I studied a lot of cars at the AutoRama in town here last month, and one of the things I noticed was that the wheels seemed a little small compared to the overall tire size, so I'm thinking for sure 16" and possibly 17" with a 30" overall diameter?
    I keep looking at all kinds of different options. as far as wheels, either American Racing Torque Thrust D's or American Racing Salt flat's.
    What do you think? Trying to go with something that copies the look of the 60's.

  15. #30
    resin addict's Avatar
    resin addict is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford 3 window Coupe
    Posts
    101

    Thanks for all the great replys, and the pictures. I'm getting a lot of good advice, and really appreciate it. Sounds like 29-30" for the rears seems to be the concensus.
    I studied a lot of cars at the AutoRama in town here last month, and one of the things I noticed was that the wheels seemed a little small compared to the overall tire size, so I'm thinking for sure 16" and possibly 17" with a 30" overall diameter?
    I keep looking at all kinds of different options. as far as wheels, either American Racing Torque Thrust D's or American Racing Salt flat's.
    What do you think? Trying to go with something that copies the look of the 60's.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink