Thread: Building 32 frame
-
10-11-2006 05:20 PM #1
Building 32 frame
I am looking for a drawing for a 32 frame with enough dimensions to build from, I want to build a completely stainlees steel frame with a custom IFS front And Jag rear. So far all that I have found are hole location drawings. If any one has any info it would be very welcomed!!
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
10-11-2006 05:43 PM #2
The common drawings like the one sold on Ebay and the ones on the Wescott site are basically the location and size of the holes in the frame. If you need the channel cross sections, such is not readily available....we have searched for three years for such and had to do our own CAD files (which are not true 1932 rails). The frame manufacturers have patterns for their plasma or laser cutters that would give you the dimensions that you need but you probably wont get them to give them to you. You might get a frame mfg to cut you a set of rails from stainless....if you really need them.....the best question is "why stainless?" Have you researched the strength of stainless vs normal steel? The cost? The weight? The weldability? If you want to do stainless for appearance sake, you might look at coatings to achieve the look at a lesser cost.
Good luck
mike in tucson
-
10-11-2006 10:11 PM #3
Originally Posted by 1923sst
like here ...
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/buil...ame-98511.html
-
10-11-2006 11:04 PM #4
Just took a look at your T bucket with SS suspension and frame. Absolutely gorgeous workmanship. You certainly do know how to work with stainless. Why don't you post some pictures of the T bucket on here for us??
Good luck with the Deuce. I'm sure it will be equally spectacular.
Don
-
10-12-2006 08:31 AM #5
It looks to me like you know what you are doing.
Wescott's site is about as good as you'll get unless you can find a frame to photo and measure. Duece posted this on the HotRodders board and it hasn't changed since then...
Knowing all of the dimensions they give you, you should be able to extrapolate anything they don't call out.
http://www.wescottsauto.com/pdf2/FR-4.pdf
MarkIf money is the root of all evil... Women must be the fertilizer...
Link to my BAD AST Build Thread:
http://www.clubhotrod.com/suspension...van-build.html
-
10-12-2006 08:34 AM #6
Why Stainless?
1) Because it doesn't rot (true for 300 series or austenitic)
2) It has comparable strength to standard framing steels. And much increase ultimate strain to failure generally. Young's Modulus and density about the same as carbon steel.
3) It looks gorgeous
4) Many austenitics are very weldable; typically 304 used for example
4) Did I mention it doesn't rot!?
Why not stainless?
1) It is more expensive to buy
2) It is more expensive to machine in some cases
3) Threads and Fasteners in stainless tend to gall easily
4) It has a much higher thermal expansion coefficient than carbon steel, like 9.5 to 6
Personally I like it. KitzJon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400
-
10-12-2006 09:31 AM #7
I don't know if this will help you or not. It's info on the original 1932. Maybe you can get an engineer to scale the drawing for you.
http://ford.tocmp.com/manuals/Ford/1932/index.htm
Pat1930 A Bone
-
10-12-2006 05:15 PM #8
Might try a phone call to America Stamping (in Mississippi) and see if they could do you up some stainless rails.....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
10-13-2006 09:42 AM #9
Originally Posted by Dave Severson
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
10-13-2006 10:26 AM #10
Did you see the work on his bucket? I don't think he will have too much trouble.
Don
-
10-13-2006 09:18 PM #11
I'm going to take the liberty of posting some more pictures of his T bucket on here. ( I just BORROWED them )
Really some beautiful craftsmanship.
Don
-
10-16-2006 09:56 AM #12
Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
10-16-2006 10:22 AM #13
Originally Posted by rumrumm
And stainless is difficult to shape and bend in a thickness that would support the loads that a frame needs to do ...
-
10-16-2006 11:05 AM #14
I agree that a '32 is a much more complex frame that a T bucket. Evidently he wants to take on this challenge to make his '32 different from the norm. In the final analysis, he may not be able to duplicate all the classic '32 reveals, etc. but maybe he can get close and do a modernized version.
I was like you guys, when I saw his original post my question was "why would you want to do this?" After seeing the work he has done though, if anybody has a shot at it, it would be him. He's got more ambition than I would ever have to tackle something of this magnitude.
Good thing he isn't a jeweler, or the thing would be gold plated.
Don
-
10-16-2006 12:00 PM #15
Just a liitle off topic, but as an automotive history buff I thought I'd put this info up for those of you that haven't seen it before. It might be of interest to those who are concerned about the ability to form compound curves in stainless steel. Sure we're talking thickness, and stress bearing issue differences, as well as tooling capabilities, but the technology is likely available for those committed enough.
http://www.alleghenyludlum.com/pages...inlesscars.aspYour Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon
It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.
Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.
A man was watching his wife as she prepared to fry sausages in a pan. He noticed that before placing the sausages in the pan, she always cut off both ends, threw them away, and cooked only the middle...
the Official CHR joke page duel