You guys are making these post way too interesting . For the last few days I have spent way to much time reading what each one of you has had to say. I have had a hard time leaving the computer,when I should have been in the shop working. Everywhere I look I have found Interesting topics. When I go to Church I drive a Camry, leather and a roof.I looks just about like every other car in the parking lot. I Don't care if that Camry is capable of having the refinements to make it run 11.O s Im not interested. Im 60 yrs old .That is not my muscle car.To someone else it might be and I think that is good for most of us.Im sure In 1960 ,the ones of us who are old enough to remember would have considered a 60 Impala 348-350 h.p. 4 speed ,456 posi or a 390 or 401 ford starliner with like equipment a muscle car although I dont think we called it that. From1962 on the Muscle Car war was on . Many lighter weight, often the cheapest body, bench seats,rubber mats with the baddest motor they had 406,409,413, 421,426, 427,428,429, 430, 454,455,460and I left out the 389, 390and 396. Although I loved corvettes I never would have put them in the muscle car class. I certainly would not have put a 427 Shelby Cobra in that class either. It was a car built just to outrun a corvette on a road corse. It was out of reach for the average guy at the time. This is just me , Your interpretation may be slightly Different or even vastly different,and in my mind thats O.K. Modern technology is great . I plan to use the parts I want and leave the rest to the younger Guys.Whoever pointed out that tires ,wheels and electronics were no where near as good back then,Thank You! Iwas hoping someone would do that.To some people 11 Os is 11.Os ,Not to me. All of You, Thank You for making this interesting and informative.