Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: H/P loss
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    bul_moose1's Avatar
    bul_moose1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    LaOtto, in
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 Pontiac TA
    Posts
    7

    Question H/P loss

     



    I need to know how to figure the horsepower loss in a drive train. I have a 383 strocker in a TA but only get 218 rhp. The car runs pretty strong and was disapointed at the numbers. No E/T runs yet.

  2. #2
    pro70z28's Avatar
    pro70z28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Camaro Z-28 Now/40 Chevy Back Then
    Posts
    4,306

    I don't think there is a formula for an exact number. If I'm wrong somebody will correct me. But, there are so many variables. What kind of trans do you have? Fluid weight and wear of internal parts will make a difference. Same is true for the rear end, u joints, wheel bearings and every moving part in the drive train.
    I think a ballpark figure might be 20 to 25% loss?

    Welcome to CHR by the way bul.
    "PLAN" your life like you will live to 120.
    "LIVE" your life like you could die tomorrow.

    John 3:16
    >>>>>>

  3. #3
    MrWizard455's Avatar
    MrWizard455 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Flint
    Car Year, Make, Model: 88 BMW327AEI(464" BB Buick T400)
    Posts
    205

    for the average rwd car a 10 percent or less loss of power between the crankshaft and wheels is excellent.....
    IE u have a 500bhp@crank mtr x .10=450whp@ the wheels....
    , problem with that is that a stock t350 GM trans in good condition w/stock or loc up converter takes 23hp to operate, a typical driveshaft in a camro/firebird another 3-5hp, an 8.5 posi rear, which is what Z28/Trans Ams come with is an 11-15hp loss depending on gearin, then u have loss for the weight of the axles and driven wheels to account for, thus, tho .10 percent is great, a 15-20 percent loss is the realistic average...
    Dallas

  4. #4
    rob
    rob is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    christchurch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1979 holden sunbird
    Posts
    6

    yep i'd go for the 20% to 25% i had a motor put on an engine dyno made 430hp when i put it on a chassis dyno it dropped by 20% had a shift kitted th350 2500 stall converter 8 inch diff,more weight in the running gear the less you will get to the rear...

  5. #5
    Swifster's Avatar
    Swifster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Studebaker Commander
    Posts
    440

    I've also heard the 15-20% numbers. The thing to remember is that not all dyno operators know what they're doing. You might want to check out another dyno location if you really feel the numbers are way off.

    I'm a big believer in computer dyno sims, and if entered accurately enter, the information (horsepower and torque levels) can be spot on. I have found this to be the case with my Suzuki race engines (within +- 3 HP).
    ---Tom

    1964 Studebaker Commander
    1964 Studebaker Daytona

  6. #6
    qwert is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    port richey
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 javelin/74 javelin
    Posts
    24

    i've heard 20-25. i bet i'm up by 25% with a 727, 3500stall and a ford 9 inch with drum brakes

  7. #7
    D10s69C10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    geneva/chuluota
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 C-10 fleetside
    Posts
    11

    i dont know alot but im sure an exact way to measure it would be a engine dyno then a rear wheel dyno. if you got the time and money

  8. #8
    sparky2263's Avatar
    sparky2263 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Keystone Heights
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 'vette, 04 GTO, 92 4.3 Blazer
    Posts
    140

    If you divide rwhp by .75 you'll be close. This only puts you at 291 hp. You didn't post mods or the dyno sheet so I'd have to guess it's either a very mild engine or the dyno was off.

  9. #9
    Cudaman's Avatar
    Cudaman is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Saint George
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1973 Plymouth Baracuda
    Posts
    24

    I would have to agree that it is somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 to 20 percent. Post up what you have done to the engine and your transmission, torque converter, type of rear end and gears.

    I like the Dyno dimulators also but you have to put in EXACT info or its just junk in and junk out. The only other thing is that you cant really test for is variables like good ring seal, low tension rings, dry sump systems, vacuum compressors, or electric water pumps which can all add pretty significant numbers to the engine HP figures. But aside from that I have found them to be accurate to 5% in either direction which is still pretty damned good for what it is.

    - Cudaman -
    Rebel Redneck Racing

  10. #10
    73RS's Avatar
    73RS is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Gonzales
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 camaro RS
    Posts
    252

    From what I have heard from some folks that use dyno's quit a bit is 15 to 20 for a standard tranny and 20 to 25% for an auto.
    High stall converters will give you some really bad dyno numbers. Most folks I know that have the lock-up torque converters always lock them up on the dyno and get much better numbers. And don't dyno in overdrive. The guys with overdrive put their cars in 3rd gear and have a switch to lock up the converter. I put out some bad numbers on the dyno with a 4500 stall, in fact I put out so bad of numbers I am upset.

  11. #11
    bul_moose1's Avatar
    bul_moose1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    LaOtto, in
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 Pontiac TA
    Posts
    7

    Happy holidays to all on here!

  12. #12
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    There are some interesting calculations that you could use from this site:

    Wallace Racing - Automotive Calculators
    Good Bye

  13. #13
    ojh
    ojh is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Berryville
    Posts
    486

    Why bother? You don't need to quantify something when you already have imperical numbers (like an ET slip). You take what you got to work with and start to refine it. Do you need to know what the dyno numbers offer? nope! you just need understand what you are working with. And start to improve from there. For example, a buddy owns like an 'H' stock camaro - a bone stock 305" motor, quadrajet, HEI, stock cam, stock intake - it is bone stock! and runs in the 10's.

  14. #14
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    no arguing here
    Last edited by Dave Severson; 12-24-2011 at 12:37 PM.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  15. #15
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    I think you're light with the 20%-25% numbers. I thought I remembered an ariticle that dealt with "...the brutal truth..." of drivetrain losses, and I think it was this one in Car Craft Drivetrain Power Loss - Car Craft Magazine which points to a 35% to 40% loss from an engine dyno to chassis dyno. Like others have said, too many variables for any accurate estimates.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink