Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Quadrajet, and spark plug questions.
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 26 of 26
  1. #16
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Originally posted by pfogle
    Actually, the 700 has a mechanical 4th gear (od) and then a torque converter lock up. My current setup is a 229V6 with a 200c three speed with a lockup TC. So it's just a matter of making sure I wire the TC correctly to the existing controls. The carb will either work or get replaced. I'm not going to mess with the electronics.. I had a '92 E150 that was MPFI on a 351w. While it got 17mpg empty at 70mph. It was a beast to work on. This is an old car with no provisions for a computer so it's not gettin one...
    the same wire thats locking up your conv now should work fine. i belive the carb. will to. i belive youll get that 20 mpg. let me know.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  2. #17
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    OK, the OD switch I am referring to is the torque converter lockup, so if you can adapt the current three speed lockup control that's fine, but it's beyond my ability. For that reason I am using the hydraulic switch with a modified 700R4 and an Edelbrock 1406 carb (600 CFM) on a non-electronic '76 Corvette 350 block. I don't want to mess with the electronic controls either, but if your 350 has them it may be easier to simulate the original setup than to eliminate them? Still you seem to know pretty much what to do now. Best Wishes.

    Don Shillady
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder

  3. #18
    pfogle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cardington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 Chevrolet Malibu Classic
    Posts
    33

    Okay.. It's gonna be a while before I can do anything.. I've got carpal tunnel problems and arthritis. This cold weather is killing me... It WILL be done before july, but I hope to have it done next month after it warms up.
    The tides of change are upon us. Are you ready?

  4. #19
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Originally posted by pfogle
    Okay.. It's gonna be a while before I can do anything.. I've got carpal tunnel problems and arthritis. This cold weather is killing me... It WILL be done before july, but I hope to have it done next month after it warms up.
    good luck.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  5. #20
    pfogle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cardington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 Chevrolet Malibu Classic
    Posts
    33

    Well the 350 is back together. It's not running yet as I'm still waiting on an intake and carb. It's getting closer! All the bearings spec'd good (.002 to.003 instead of the .005 to .006 we had. We used .002 oversize bearings.)
    The tides of change are upon us. Are you ready?

  6. #21
    urotu's Avatar
    urotu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Car Year, Make, Model: '77 Blazer, '64 Buick, '29 A Tudor
    Posts
    135

    Hey there. I'll drop mine in here too, 'cause. Most of what goin' on here sounds like good advice, but I wouldn't worry too much about the "computer" on that '86 burban. It's pretty much just a body computer. That is is doesn't actually run much on the engine, just takes readings, pretty much. The carb you're talkin' about, if Im not mistaken, is the early electric carb and it's about the only "computer" controlled component on the engine itself.

    '86, standard old HEI I'm guessin? Those 2 wires on the carb are still technicall a TPS so that would be the only problem I would forsee. The carb won't respond as well as with the box. Other than that you should be able to dump the air pump, O2 sensors, etc... and have no problems. On the up side that is still a quad intake so an earlier model would fit no prob and you would still see the benefits of "stock" asspiration, ie: better mileage and good all around performance.

    I'm glad to see everything spec'd out good. Should be a great mill for that G body.

  7. #22
    fordwrench is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bellingham
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 F100 Style side
    Posts
    9

    If I'm correct






    The carb you have is not a feed back/o2 sensor carb. The two wire device on top is a cold enrichment solenoid not a mixture control solenoid. You will find replaceable jets inside.

  8. #23
    fordwrench is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bellingham
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 F100 Style side
    Posts
    9

    Oh yea, The distributer is probably a five wire with a vac. and mechanical advance. The suburban had a spark control computer and a knock sensor to retard timing through the module.

  9. #24
    goldenrog's Avatar
    goldenrog is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    st paul
    Car Year, Make, Model: 51 Pontiac
    Posts
    3

    The 2 wire plug on top is the vent solenoid. It looks identical to the mixture control solenoid on the passenger car carb. The trucks never used ECM controlled fuel mixture. The only thing you should have to do is find out how GM controlled the vent function (I would speculate that any time the key is on the vent solenoid would be energized to close it, if that's the case you could take any key on B+ and power it) Bear in mind that you should retain all the emmision crud to match the carb. You might do better with an earlier manifold and QJ.

  10. #25
    goldenrog's Avatar
    goldenrog is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    st paul
    Car Year, Make, Model: 51 Pontiac
    Posts
    3

    On the distributor subject, the knock retard fuction of the module can be by-passed. If you need the procedure, drop me an e-mail and I'll get it from my PC at work.

  11. #26
    pfogle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Cardington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 Chevrolet Malibu Classic
    Posts
    33

    Actually, I replaced the carb with a Edelbrock 600cfm carter/afb. Went with an OLD weiand x-celerator intake (circa mid 60's, has the hole in the intake for the oil fill... The dizzy is a standard HEI. I just bought a 2001 windstar so the malibu MAY get done finally.
    The tides of change are upon us. Are you ready?

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink