Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: This maybe a dumb question.
          
   
   

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    Well, there are probably several reasons.

    1) It would also entail moving the oil pump and drive to the front, and a front sump pan is harder to squeeze into a chassis.

    2) Traditionally, most GM products have had them there on the V8's.

    3) When any auto maker builds a product they could care less about how easy or hard it it for us to squeeze it into some other chassis later on. All they care about is how it will work in the car they are building, so they simply allow for that distributor when they engineer the car.

    4) They probably saw no reason to do so. It functions just as well there, and aside from the distributor clearing the firewall issue, there is no reason for it to be on the front.

    5) It would entail redesigning an engine that has basically existed since 1955, and that would cost money.

    But I think the main thing is that there is just no reason for them to want to make such a change. (If it ain't broke.................)

    JMO,


    Don
    Last edited by Itoldyouso; 06-18-2006 at 05:27 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink