Thread: This maybe a dumb question.
-
06-18-2006 04:54 AM #1
This maybe a dumb question.
This maybe a dumb question but why didn't Chevy ever fool around with the idea of distributor in the front like a Ford. I just think that you would have much more clearance in the back especially when your trying to clear a firewall.If I knew anything I'd be dangerous.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
06-18-2006 06:15 AM #2
Well, there are probably several reasons.
1) It would also entail moving the oil pump and drive to the front, and a front sump pan is harder to squeeze into a chassis.
2) Traditionally, most GM products have had them there on the V8's.
3) When any auto maker builds a product they could care less about how easy or hard it it for us to squeeze it into some other chassis later on. All they care about is how it will work in the car they are building, so they simply allow for that distributor when they engineer the car.
4) They probably saw no reason to do so. It functions just as well there, and aside from the distributor clearing the firewall issue, there is no reason for it to be on the front.
5) It would entail redesigning an engine that has basically existed since 1955, and that would cost money.
But I think the main thing is that there is just no reason for them to want to make such a change. (If it ain't broke.................)
JMO,
DonLast edited by Itoldyouso; 06-18-2006 at 06:27 AM.
-
06-18-2006 06:51 AM #3
A few years back, somebody was making a front drive for chebbies that relocated the distributor to the front..... Can't remember who it was. But yeah, like Don said, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. When you want to put the chebbie engine in something and have a bit of extra setback, all you have to do is notch the firewall for cap clearance.....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
06-18-2006 08:25 AM #4
When you have to work on the distributor and you have back problems,and it's a Fard,,,,you think,,,"Yep,,,(better idea)".Hey has that thing gotta Heme in it? No, it's a shevy not heme!
-
06-18-2006 08:49 AM #5
when i get up in the morning with a back problem and find out i have to work on a ford, i call dave or denny, and go back to bed.Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
06-19-2006 12:20 AM #6
I've seen those front drive distributors that drive off the cam with some kind of belt setup. I just don't know if I would trust something that is not meshed gear to gear.If I knew anything I'd be dangerous.
-
06-19-2006 01:17 AM #7
I guess you would get more accurate timing with a distributor driven off the cam. What would you cover the open hole in the back of the block with?If I knew anything I'd be dangerous.
-
06-19-2006 01:40 AM #8
Originally Posted by Gerald Streeksjust because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
-
06-19-2006 01:42 AM #9
Well I guess you could just take the gear off and cut the top off of the old distributor.If I knew anything I'd be dangerous.
-
06-24-2006 12:35 AM #10
The Buick 231 V6 indeed is a GM engine with a cam driven distributor mounted up front. Any easier to work on than the rear mount small block distributors? IMHO- Nope.
-Fordlords-
-
06-24-2006 06:22 AM #11
This maybe a dumb question but why didn't Chevy ever fool around with the idea of distributor in the front like a Ford. I just think that you would have much more clearance in the back especially when your trying to clear a firewall.
Chevy did change to a front-mounted, cam-drive distributor - on the LT-1 motor.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
06-24-2006 09:33 AM #12
why run a distributor when you can have a full computer managed system with coil of plugjust because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird