Thread: exhaust size
-
06-29-2006 11:12 AM #1
exhaust size
working on bored out 235(so its about 242) on a 58 chevy )and i am getting alot of conflicting info about exhaust size. we talked to clifford performance and obviously they recommend their headers which are 2 1/4 in. as opposed to what we had originally designed -- using fentons, which was 2 1/2 in. THe guy we talked to was saying that if too much back pressure is eliminated the torque will suffer because quote" backpressure is good for low end torque but is bad for high end horsepower"??????? just dont get this. why would more force working against the piston on the exhaust stroke creat more torque? What am i to do? Is clifford just trying to get me to buy their headers, which i might add are total:$414.00 with the coating, whereas say hot rods of norco can gove me ceramic coated pair for $219.00. And what size exhaust do i go with? not to mention the problem of fitting on intake and exhaust maifolds ---clifford said that basically their exhaust headers are the only ones that wold fit with their manifold---is this true? cause it sure is expensive.
thanks
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
06-29-2006 01:49 PM #2
I know what the guy's trying to say, but he might want to word it a little differently. Exhaust scavenging plays a large part in the shape of the power curve. While back pressure is never a *good* thing, exhaust system diameters that are larger than neccessary for an engine's particular state of tune can create exhaust gas velocity so low that they affect scavenging, and cylinder filling. Obviously, engines tuned to develop their power in the upper part of the band can utilize larger diameter tubes without severely reducing gas velocity. Milder engine with broader torque bands probably would do better wiith smaller diameters. Hopefully, I've said it a little better than the Clifford Performance guy.
Bob
-
06-29-2006 02:13 PM #3
hey thanks for the response, you did clear it up nicely
appreciate it
will write if more question (which there will no doubt be
-
06-29-2006 02:24 PM #4
As I remember, some of the same bolts secure both the intake and exhaust manifolds on a 235 Chevy 6. It's very likely that one manufacturer's exhaust won't fit with another's intake.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
06-29-2006 02:37 PM #5
I am just surprised that a 235 will move a 58 barge down the road with anything resembling speed. When we built a 58 Impala kustom leadslead we yanked the 348 in favor of a 396. It moves well but would be a better mover with a 502.
-
06-29-2006 03:03 PM #6
your just as suprised as me. but all the more reason to squeeze as many horses out of my little 242 as i can.
-
06-29-2006 03:58 PM #7
Since you're on a budget, why not use the stocker intake and adapt a Rochester 2bbl to it? Then, shave the head a bit to up the compression to about 9:1.
Both header tube sizes seem a bit large.... 2 1/4 inches is a huge tube to a small block Chevy....are two cylinders feeding a single tube?
Tried to find the Clifford web site...it looks like it is a combo of porn links and car parts.....Jack would roll in his grave if he saw this.
mike in tucson
-
06-29-2006 04:06 PM #8
the clifford site is cliffordperformance.net, and yes two pipes feed into a collector -- thats the reason for the largish tubes. And my pops is not ever too happy about shaving heads so well see. will talk later. thanks for all the help
-
06-29-2006 04:10 PM #9
>Tried to find the Clifford web site...it looks like it is a combo of porn links and >car parts.....Jack would roll in his grave if he saw this.
Try this: http://www.cliffordperformance.net/
Bob
-
06-29-2006 04:59 PM #10
Thanks for the info...if you go to cliffordperformance.com, the site is strange. It does refer to cars and to porn.... maybe not a bad combo in some occasions.
Nothing wrong with shaving the head.... think of it as "trueing the head surface" only the machinist takes a little more metal off. I have had a 235 shaved 0.100" before..... with a '54 Corvette cam, it ran really well.....
well for a 235 that is.
-
06-29-2006 06:23 PM #11
hey hey dont be bangin on my engine....haha
-
06-29-2006 07:07 PM #12
I ran a 235 with a '54 corvette cam, two one-bbl carbs and Fenton splits. With the stock 4.10 gears, it was a pretty good stoplight bandit in a relatively light-weight '52 2-door post. The 390 4-bbl should work OK also. if you get it jetted correctly.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
07-01-2006 04:17 PM #13
The reason the 6 can move that barge so well is due to it's torque down low. As for the pipe diameter, 2.25" is plenty from the head to the exit.It's only a truck if it's workin it's ass off. Anything else is just a car with a box on the back. I know my C10 aint gonna be pampered. If ittl move, I'll keep driving it...
If the motor aint greasy and the rears still have new tire shine on the tread lugs, it's a trailer queen. Let 'em run WFOT!
-
07-01-2006 05:15 PM #14
the reason that it can move is because it has 4.10 gears in the rear, yes the torque helps, but that gearing only mutiplys itYou don't know what you've got til it's gone
Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver
1967 Ford Falcon- Sold
1930's styled hand built ratrod project
1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird