Thread: 80 Trans Am engine question
-
09-03-2006 03:27 AM #1
80 Trans Am engine question
I recently purchased my 1980 Trans Am and am looking for some opinions. I am planning to build a strip/street car and am looking for (obviously) a decent amount of power. My first question is how much work would be involved in swapping the PSB 301 for a PBB 455? I keep hearing people tell me it would be the best engine, but I wasn't sure what all is involved with swapping from small to big blocks. Also was wondering if it would be more effective to maybe just stick with a 400 and just keep in the small block "family"? Thanks for any help
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
09-03-2006 08:15 AM #2
Originally Posted by B/A T/AMike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
09-03-2006 10:31 AM #3
Look at the parts on the 79 silverbird for big block hardware and it will fit right in.The 80 is still the smokey and the bandit style?Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
09-03-2006 11:16 AM #4
Originally Posted by lt1s10just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
-
09-03-2006 02:13 PM #5
Naw, the "Bandit" was a 77. The 79-81 was a different body. And as my undestanding goes, the silver bird is a very rare car. I'm obviously going to change the motor mounts (as they are older than me, haha) But i read somewhere you'de have to put differentmotor mount plates to keep the additional torque of the BB. Does that sound correct? I'm swapping out the transmission at the same time, so I'm not worried about that. Thanks everyone!
-
09-05-2006 12:09 AM #6
i dont know about the mount brackets about tourque handling.... if the big block mounts mount to them you should be high.... if the bolting seems a little weak, then you could either drill out and put larger bolts in or do a little welding..... if the torque is a big issue it'd be more likely that it'd be that the torque is too much for the factory rearend or also the unibody itself.... which in the case you gotta add shock tower braces, weld the shock towers, use a larger diameter sway bar and that suchjust because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
-
09-05-2006 06:28 AM #7
Just some stuff to think about...
The "F" body cars, Firebird & Camaro are basically the same cars from 1970 to 1981 with a few minor styling and suspension changes.
The 1970 to '81 "F" bodies do not have "shock towers" to weld up or add braces to. The upper shock mounts are on the sub-frame not the body.
A set of sub-frame connectors will help with the extra torque and the stock rear will probably need some work if you want to put down the torque of the 455. A good set of gears and an Auburn posi unit would work well as would a set of CalTrac traction bars.
A Pontiac 455 and a Chevy 454 are NOT the same motors, not even close. Your 301 is a Pontiac based engine and is the same basic block as the PONTIAC 455. A 455 will bolt in on those mounts. All Pontiac motors are the same basic block configuration from the 301, 326, 350, 389, 400, 421, 428 & 455. Internals are different from size to size and year to year but a little judicious research will give you some insight.
Here is some info... There is a ton of this stuff on the internet. Do some searches...
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ine/index.html
http://www.yearone.com/updatedsingle...ontengid1.html
http://www.krepower.com/If money is the root of all evil... Women must be the fertilizer...
Link to my BAD AST Build Thread:
http://www.clubhotrod.com/suspension...van-build.html
-
09-05-2006 06:49 AM #8
I'm with Astro, go with the 455, some frame ties and maybe even a 4 or 6 point cage. Might as well, the back seat is pretty much unusable in the F-bodies anyhow..... Depending on how much $$$$ you want to spend and how much power you want, Edelbrock makes a very nice set of aluminum heads for the poncho's. These heads along with the matching intake and cam with a good free flowing exhaust would make for a strong running torque monster.Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
09-05-2006 07:41 AM #9
Originally Posted by thesalsMike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
09-05-2006 12:20 PM #10
Like I said cross reference the 79 silver bird for part numbers,because it came with the 455!!!I know all you will need will be listed on that model!!!Just because the motor mounts came on a silver bird does not mean they are 3 times the price They may be ,but crossreference the part numbers for similar parts on normal models and or cross over part numbers.I have rode in and driven the silverbird and it needs nothing more than the factory set up to scream!!!455 ,4 speed,4.11 posi,what more needs to be said!!Other than roll cage,frame ties and safety safety safety!!!!!Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
09-08-2006 08:13 AM #11
Swapping in a Pontiac 350/389/400/455 in place of a 301 is easy to do. It is a very popular swap since there is virtually no aftermarket for the 301.
Pontiac made "Bandit" versions of the Trans Am from 1977 all the way into 1984. The original "Bandit" movie car was actually a 1976 Trans Am with a pre-production 1977 front clip. The movie was filmed before the 1977 models were being built. There were 3 "Bandit" movies. The first used the 1976 T/A with the pre-prod front end, The second movie used a 1980 Turbo T/A, and the last one (without Burt) used a 1983 T/A. (The last movie was really bad with Jerry Reed "faking" he was the Bandit.)
The Body style of the Firebirds from 1970 thru 1981 was the same with only changes to the nose and tail thru the years. The body style change over was the 1982 Firebird.
The 326 Pontiac was not of the same block design as the other Pontiac V-8's.
It was actually designed by Buick.
-
09-08-2006 09:09 AM #12
Originally Posted by Oreif
I believe you mis-read the tech info on the Wikipedia site I listed earlier...
Read it again and realize that the "Buick" engine was dropped in favor of the iron "326"...
326
For 1963 Pontiac dropped the aluminum V8 it had offered on the Pontiac Tempest (which was built by Buick) and replaced it with a de-bored version of the standard Pontiac V8. It shared the 389's 3.75 in (95.3 mm) stroke, but its bore was reduced to 3.72 in (94.5 mm), giving it a displacement of 326 in³ (5.4 L). It was rated at 260 hp (193 kW) with a single, two-barrel carburetor. The 326 subsequently became the standard V8 engine for Tempests, and later the Pontiac Firebird, through 1967.
For 1967, its final year, a higher-output version, called the L76, had a four-barrel carb, dual exhausts, and higher compression, and was good for 285 hp (213 kW).If money is the root of all evil... Women must be the fertilizer...
Link to my BAD AST Build Thread:
http://www.clubhotrod.com/suspension...van-build.html
-
06-17-2009 12:01 AM #13
-
06-17-2009 06:08 AM #14
Might want to check the post date, this one is from 2006Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
06-17-2009 12:45 PM #15
.
Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
EG
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird