Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: youre opinion please
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by S19243H
    seems no one likes that lunati cam . i thoght it would be a better pick since it seems smaller
    I do like Lunati's camshafts just not that cam because it is symetrical.
    I do like the Lunati Voodoo cam number 60102.
    Specs. are .468/.489 lift,duration at .050 is 219/227,110 L/S.
    I think I would try and run a 2,000 stall with this cam.

  2. #2
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Engine size/cam duration/total weight.............Taking all that into account,2,000 stall will be no problem at all,possibly more like Pat said,depends on how performance orientated you want it.....
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink