Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Cadillac Compression Ratio
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Maxb49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Hamburg
    Posts
    45

    Cadillac Compression Ratio

     



    The 1952 Cadillac 331 was rated at 180 horsepower with a 7.5:1 compression ratio. Would raising the CR to 10:1 bring you near 300 horsepower?

  2. #2
    mooneye777's Avatar
    mooneye777 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    dayton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1948 ford anglia
    Posts
    978

    If you raise the compression you will have to bump up a few other things to get the benefit from raising it. Like a good intake with about a 650 double pumper, headers, and a good port job to the heads. If those stock heads would even work well with a good port job.


    Live everyday like it were your last, someday it will be.

  3. #3
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    I doubt that it would make 200 with just the CR bumped up.

  4. #4
    Maxb49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Hamburg
    Posts
    45

    Is there really anything that can be done to this engine which would produce genuinely respectable performance numbers, by today's standards? According to one source I have read, the 331 shares parts with the 327 chevrolet.

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    This motor will respond to the same changes as any other OHV motor. The problem is that there are no off-the-shelf parts like there are for the more popular motors. If you're going to use this motor regardless, then possibly the best way to increase power by 40-60% would be with forced induction (centrifugal supercharger/blower/turbo(s). There will be a limit to the power/rpm's the motor will tolerate, with the weak link being the valvetrain, pistons, rods, crank or the main bearing webbing in the block. One or more of these will lay down on you at some point in your quest for more power.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    As a point of interest, the engine in Norm Grabowskis T bucket was reportedly from his Dad's '52 Caddy. He somehow convinced his Pop that the engine was in need of a replacement, and he ended up with the old motor.

    These Caddys were real powerhouses in their day. Guys like Bill Frick pioneered the Fordillac cars, where he swapped various Caddys into early '50's Fords. They made real screamers of those Fords. In the '50's the two engines most often swapped were the Caddy and Olds engines. Chryslers were popular, but large, and Buicks were just starting to appear, and the sbc didn't come out until '55.

    300 hp is possible, but it will take some doing and some money. Most of it will be spent inside the engine doing stuff like balancing, boring, higher compression pistons, a good cam, and some SERIOUS head work. As Richard mentioned, parts availability will be not as good as more popular engines, however, I bought a lot of stuff from Egge Machine when I built the 394 in my Dodge truck. I think Mondello is also a source and can probably tell you how feasible it is to attempt this.

    I wouldn't be too hung up on what hp you end up with, I would just do the normal hot rod tricks to the point your wallet starts to scream, and see how you like the way it runs. If you still want more go, break out another credit card.

    Don

  7. #7
    Maxb49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Hamburg
    Posts
    45

    Quote Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
    As a point of interest, the engine in Norm Grabowskis T bucket was reportedly from his Dad's '52 Caddy. He somehow convinced his Pop that the engine was in need of a replacement, and he ended up with the old motor.

    These Caddys were real powerhouses in their day. Guys like Bill Frick pioneered the Fordillac cars, where he swapped various Caddys into early '50's Fords. They made real screamers of those Fords. In the '50's the two engines most often swapped were the Caddy and Olds engines. Chryslers were popular, but large, and Buicks were just starting to appear, and the sbc didn't come out until '55.

    300 hp is possible, but it will take some doing and some money. Most of it will be spent inside the engine doing stuff like balancing, boring, higher compression pistons, a good cam, and some SERIOUS head work. As Richard mentioned, parts availability will be not as good as more popular engines, however, I bought a lot of stuff from Egge Machine when I built the 394 in my Dodge truck. I think Mondello is also a source and can probably tell you how feasible it is to attempt this.

    I wouldn't be too hung up on what hp you end up with, I would just do the normal hot rod tricks to the point your wallet starts to scream, and see how you like the way it runs. If you still want more go, break out another credit card.

    Don

    Haha!

    The reason I ask is because of a certain 1956 Cadillac advertised with the engine for $8,000 and wanted to know if the car/engine combination was worth it for my purposes before laying out serious cash. I'm just not sure it wouldn't be more cost effective to go the route of a newer small block.

    You guys sure know your stuff!

  8. #8
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxb49
    Is there really anything that can be done to this engine which would produce genuinely respectable performance numbers, by today's standards? According to one source I have read, the 331 shares parts with the 327 chevrolet.
    I suspect that the only thing shared by both these motors is that they're both made of cast iron.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  9. #9
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    If a guy wanted to keep it all Cadillac, he might look into transplanting a '68 to '76 Cadillac 472 or 500 cubic inch motor complete with TH400 auto trans or even adapt a later 700R4 behind the motor for the 4th overdrive gear. Anything and everything is available for these motors, including aluminum cylinder heads.
    http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w...gine_Knowledge
    http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w...e_500_Cadillac
    http://www.500cid.com/
    http://www.cad500parts.com/
    http://www.cadillacperformanceparts.com/
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink