Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Best build for torque?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    ksjohn is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Appleton
    Posts
    2

    Best build for torque?

     



    I am rebuilding my '88 454 from my Motor home and would like some input on the best way to do it. Here are the two scenarios that I am looking at.

    1) New pistons, stock bore, stock heads(14092360), stock intake(14087497), summit racing cam(Duration 266/276, Lift .475/.500) Chevy RV headers.

    2) New Pistons, stock bore, 3993820 heads, Summit racing intake(Stage 1, Dual Plane, Aluminum, Natural, Square/Spread Bore, Chevy, Big Block, Oval Ports,), summit racing cam(Duration 266/276, Lift .475/.500) Chevy RV headers.

    Which scenario will work best in my 31'-11,000 pound motor home? Fuel economy isn't really an issue, i would just like to be able to go down the road while towing my Jeep and have enough power to go up hills.

    any help would be greatly appreciated!!

  2. #2
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Pat is the engine builder who normally posts on BBC's.My input to this is you should make a aftermarket cast iron head apart of your plan.The stock truck engine heads are pretty poor as was the camming.
    Good Bye

  3. #3
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    iron stock heads will work for TQ use. what rpm range are you looking for ? bigger engine would help some
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  4. #4
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    I just turned the air cleaner lid up side down on my 1984 454----------biggest change I saw between my truck was I got better milage with single rear wheels than my buddy did with idenical truck except for dual wheels---they were 4 numbers apart in vin as we ordered them at same time--I had bigger Chapperal gooseneck triler, he had Wells Cargo bumper hitch, both hauling Pro stockers, same speed on the road ( aprox 70-75 on interstate, 4.11 gears)I'd get 8mpg he got 6mph---------

  5. #5
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy View Post
    iron stock heads will work for TQ use. what rpm range are you looking for ? bigger engine would help some
    Surprised about the stock heads Pat.I'll set back in the cheap seats to learn more.

  6. #6
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by 1gary View Post
    Surprised about the stock heads Pat.I'll set back in the cheap seats to learn more.
    why should there be a surprise ? about the head s. i do not know what head numbers he has. but bbc iron heads are not that bad over all many bbc that can make 600hp+ all day with stock iron heads .thats is not to say there is better but for what he is doing no need for any thing much more then stock casting with a tune up job maybe some better valves nice 4 angle valve job and a 11/32 stem if it needs guide work . i think he looking for off idle to 2700 max RPM for TQ alot of stock heads will do this job
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  7. #7
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Pat I just thought about everytime we talk about the GM truck BBC peanut heads and how poor they are.Not questioning you,but learning more.

  8. #8
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by 1gary View Post
    Pat I just thought about everytime we talk about the GM truck BBC peanut heads and how poor they are.Not questioning you,but learning more.
    please show me here were i said there junk heads ? i never said the peanut ports would not work for this build and that head is not as bad as many think . i do not bad mouth them heads.i have seen them work good for what they are . but i may have told you on the tall deck build 526 or bigger that you wanted numbers for.. yes there is better heads for a build like that
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 07-11-2012 at 07:43 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  9. #9
    ksjohn is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Appleton
    Posts
    2

    I am sorry for the confusion on scenario #2. The heads i plan to use are GM 3993820 heads. From what i have read that are similar to the 049 and 781 heads.
    I understand the theory of using the Peanut Ports for TQ but this motor stock is rated at 230hp 385TQ.
    I feel that with the big port heads, big port intake, headers, a decent cam and a tuned quadrajet this motor should be 325-350 hp and 425-450TQ or am i wrong?
    I have all the parts I mentioned so why wouldn't I use them?

  10. #10
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by ksjohn View Post
    I am sorry for the confusion on scenario #2. The heads i plan to use are GM 3993820 heads. From what i have read that are similar to the 049 and 781 heads.
    I understand the theory of using the Peanut Ports for TQ but this motor stock is rated at 230hp 385TQ.
    I feel that with the big port heads, big port intake, headers, a decent cam and a tuned quadrajet this motor should be 325-350 hp and 425-450TQ or am i wrong?
    I have all the parts I mentioned so why wouldn't I use them?
    i built alot of bbc thats about all i do and do this for a living . i am just not so fast to post on many of the what can i get threads. there is many ways to do it .but i can tell you many marine engines used the peanut port heads on a bone stock 454 with a marine cam about 500/500 and 222/222 and 114 or 115 i think. they made 330 hp thats with a low pro iron intake and iron log ex . think about it a hi rise dual plane intake and a good EX 375hp EZ it not just heads smaller ports work better for low rpm and cam .engine i am working on right now that will make over 600 tq just off ilde abit to 3200 or so hp is 500 . they do go some what hand in hand but who cares about hp .i need TQ so i work the numbers for max tq at the RPM range . for what we are looking for. i work cam numbers till i get what i want
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 07-11-2012 at 09:54 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink