Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By rspears
  • 1 Post By 34_40

Thread: EFI upgrade
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    billy zz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    farmington new mexico
    Car Year, Make, Model: 27 CHEVY P/U
    Posts
    742

    EFI upgrade

     



    with my stock 302 5.0 liter engine and a holley 2 bbl carb.
    i wonder how difficult / expensive it would be to switch over to EFI?
    keep in mind that i am new at mechanical stuff.
    a hot rod is whatever i decide it is.

  2. #2
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is online now CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    Quote Originally Posted by billy zz View Post
    with my stock 302 5.0 liter engine and a holley 2 bbl carb.
    i wonder how difficult / expensive it would be to switch over to EFI?
    keep in mind that i am new at mechanical stuff.
    Pretty easy if you go with one of the throttle body injection systems, like Edelbrock's E-Street:
    Edelbrock.com - Electronic Fuel Injection - E-Street™ - Introduction
    or MSD's Atomic EFI package:
    Atomic LS - Less Wires, More Performance
    You'd need to get a 4-barrel manifold to replace your 2 barrel unit, but other than that it's pretty much plug & play. I think you'll be playing in the $2500 range, not counting your manifold, but you need to verify that with suppliers.
    Last edited by rspears; 11-01-2012 at 05:24 PM.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  3. #3
    randyr's Avatar
    randyr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Ford tudor humpback
    Posts
    1,988

    Quote Originally Posted by billy zz View Post
    with my stock 302 5.0 liter engine and a holley 2 bbl carb.
    i wonder how difficult / expensive it would be to switch over to EFI?
    keep in mind that i am new at mechanical stuff.
    You could also find a 88 to 93 Mustang Gt with a blown engine and get intake, computer, sensors, wiring, etc and add it on for pretty cheap. Here's a bit of info on one way to do it...Mustangs Plus - Tech Articles - Project EFI GT (Page 2)
    "It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out." - H.G. Wells

  4. #4
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is online now CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    Quote Originally Posted by randyr View Post
    You could also find a 88 to 93 Mustang Gt with a blown engine and get intake, computer, sensors, wiring, etc and add it on for pretty cheap. Here's a bit of info on one way to do it...Mustangs Plus - Tech Articles - Project EFI GT (Page 2)
    Randy is 100% right, but those OEM intakes are pretty much Butt Ugly, especially on an open hood street rod. Just sayin'..... Also, they are direct port injection (8 injectors on fuel rails), but they are batch fire control so they are very similar to the TBI units in performance.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  5. #5
    randyr's Avatar
    randyr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Ford tudor humpback
    Posts
    1,988

    Quote Originally Posted by rspears View Post
    Randy is 100% right, but those OEM intakes are pretty much Butt Ugly, especially on an open hood street rod. Just sayin'..... Also, they are direct port injection (8 injectors on fuel rails), but they are batch fire control so they are very similar to the TBI units in performance.
    I'm prepping a '92 Mustang 5.0/AOD to put in my 66 F100. I swapped the Mustang intake for the Ford Explorer intake because it's supposed to be worth 10-15 more horsepower. I don't think it looks too bad, but then I can also close the hood on it....

    "It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out." - H.G. Wells

  6. #6
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is online now CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    Quote Originally Posted by randyr View Post
    I'm prepping a '92 Mustang 5.0/AOD to put in my 66 F100. I swapped the Mustang intake for the Ford Explorer intake because it's supposed to be worth 10-15 more horsepower. I don't think it looks too bad, but then I can also close the hood on it....
    Beauty's in the eye of the beholder, right? I've just never been a fan of that massive cross flow manifold for an exposed engine. My son's Fox body Mustang had an Edelbrock unit, but still the same side to side flow path. They look fine under the hood, and with the room in your F-100 it'll look trick.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  7. #7
    randyr's Avatar
    randyr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 Ford tudor humpback
    Posts
    1,988

    Quote Originally Posted by rspears View Post
    Beauty's in the eye of the beholder, right? I've just never been a fan of that massive cross flow manifold for an exposed engine. My son's Fox body Mustang had an Edelbrock unit, but still the same side to side flow path. They look fine under the hood, and with the room in your F-100 it'll look trick.
    Well, the most beautiful part of all of it is I'm hoping to at least double my mpg's over what the old 352 gets!!! If it does that, I'm not too concerned about what it looks like!!

    That new MSD system looks pretty sweet for someone who wants EFI but maintain a carb look....
    "It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out." - H.G. Wells

  8. #8
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is online now CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    Quote Originally Posted by randyr View Post
    Well, the most beautiful part of all of it is I'm hoping to at least double my mpg's over what the old 352 gets!!! If it does that, I'm not too concerned about what it looks like!!

    That new MSD system looks pretty sweet for someone who wants EFI but maintain a carb look....
    And you're gettin' it for a bunch less than $2500, I'd bet.... I'd say ya' done good!
    randyr likes this.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  9. #9
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,699

    OH MY GAWD! Randy shared an engine pic!!! Wait a minute... I need to go write this down... where's that calender???
    randyr likes this.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink