Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree23Likes

Thread: Can you remove and replace a piston from a 350 from the bottom
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 33

Threaded View

  1. #28
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,891

    Having had some experience with small claims courts, and a specific example remotely similar to this, I feel comfortable telling you your chances of getting satisfaction are close to zero given what you've described. It's worth a shot, but don't be surprised when you end up with nothing but spun wheels.
    While it's nice to think that justice and "truth" will prevail here's what you're up against. It's very likely the judge, justice, magistrate, whatever, that presides doesn't have an intimate understanding of the engine at hand. Given the realities of court scheduling and the relative insignificance of your claim (I know, not insignificant to you, but in a world sense), he/she isn't going to spend any time doing research on your or the defendants behalf. It will all come down to the "facts" (if it sounds like opinion you lose) in testimony, which will need to be overwhelming or irrefutable. Unless either you or he are complete dolts you will likely both come across as credible, each expressing opinions/beliefs/facts that sound equally reasonable to the "judge". Unless one of you can demonstrate irrefutable data (unlikely from your description), the best you could hope for as a judgement would be a 50/50 split of the costs which would mean the other party would have to refund you a portion of the actual bill (assuming you've paid and likely nothing for your subsequent time). IF it even gets to that, you'll still only have a judgement against the other party and an empty hand. You'll still have to collect. If he stiffs you there, and you have no garnishment recourse, you'll have to open a case in superior court............and bring out the wallet.

    Believe it or not that's the condensed version, but you should get the point. I wish you well..........
    Last edited by Bob Parmenter; 11-08-2015 at 08:32 AM.
    rspears and 36 sedan like this.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink