Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree11Likes
  • 2 Post By Hotrod46
  • 2 Post By Dave Severson
  • 2 Post By Hotrod46
  • 3 Post By rspears
  • 2 Post By 34_40

Thread: Pressure test new cooling system?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Hotrod46's Avatar
    Hotrod46 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vidalia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1946 Ford Coupe, 1962 Austin Healey 3000
    Posts
    1,504

    Pressure test new cooling system?

     



    I will soon be at the point of filling the new cooling system in my LS powered Healey. I'm thinking of rigging up a way to pressurize the DRY cooling system to 15 or so pounds and allowing it to sit with a gauge attached to check for any leaks. This would be the same as checking an AC system with vacuum. I have also saw AC systems pressurized with nitrogen to check for leaks before pulling a vacuum.

    Anyone see any issues with this idea as long as I keep pressure lower than radiator cap pressure?

    I'm running a separate expansion tank since the radiator is lower than the engine. I have a couple of places where it would be simple to introduce air pressure. I know that you can get radiator test kits, but they have small hand pumps and would take a long time to pressurize a dry system.
    Dave Severson and 36 sedan like this.
    Mike

    I seldom do anything within the scope of logical reason and calculated cost/benefit, etc-
    I'm following my pass​ion

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    As long as you have a reliable pressure regulator and a good gauge, should work just fine.
    Hotrod46 and 36 sedan like this.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    Hotrod46's Avatar
    Hotrod46 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vidalia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1946 Ford Coupe, 1962 Austin Healey 3000
    Posts
    1,504

    Kinda what I was thinking, but I don't know everything. Don't tell my wife I said that!:
    Dave Severson and 36 sedan like this.
    Mike

    I seldom do anything within the scope of logical reason and calculated cost/benefit, etc-
    I'm following my pass​ion

  4. #4
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,179

    It's a great idea, and in fact I'm thinking that Glenn Sexton(?) may have posted something about always doing a dry pressure check before adding any coolant to eliminate surprises..... and unexpected mess.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  5. #5
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,721

    I think it could be helpful, but... I'm wondering the "density" difference of water with a Specific Gravity of "1", and air = assume a "0".. you may discover a "leak" that you wouldn't find when wet. I have no factual information at my fingertips, except that when we are testing a water pipe, it must be done wet. If the calculated average volume is expected to be 1/4 to 1/2 full then we must fill the pipe to at least 2/3 full and then cap and tap - add air to what ever spec is required. If you use Nitrogen, the molecules are larger than Oxygen molecules and again will show no leaks but then when you charge with air.. you'll have a leak. This is why the tire shops offer a filling with Nitrogen for a couple bucks as you (theoretically) won't lose tire pressure when filled with Nitrogen.

    My thoughts fwiw... LOL.
    Dave Severson and 36 sedan like this.

  6. #6
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    The liquid fill requirement may be to limit total compressible volume, to minimize potential for damage in case of catastrophic failure.
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  7. #7
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    Oh, and my perspective on filling tires with all nitrogen vs. 78% nitrogen: 100% bs.
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  8. #8
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,721

    Quote Originally Posted by firebird77clone View Post
    The liquid fill requirement may be to limit total compressible volume, to minimize potential for damage in case of catastrophic failure.
    Nah.leak test is only using 10 to 12 psi.. once in a while some engineer goes wild and specs 15 psi for 24 hours.. it's just a leak test.. Pressure test - depending on the expected operating pressure, we would probably bury the pipe to contain any shrapnel..

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink