-
01-30-2006 08:13 AM #16
Originally posted by DennyW
Looks like it's getting to hot (lean). Correct this right away.Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-30-2006 08:19 AM #17
cid x max rpm divided by 3456 = CFM
The 402 with a hyd. cam that carries a max rpm without float @ 6500.... doesn't matter that you decide to run it at 5000, or a 650 if you want, as long as you can achive enough cfm to stay away from lean burn.
You posted that you've already reached the next to max with the carb that you've got- that put's you at about 670 now & still too lean- I guess that after you reach the max on the primary side you can - I dunno, hog it out.....or rework the venturi's- good luck with that one, or get a carb with larger primary's.Last edited by hambiskit; 01-30-2006 at 08:33 AM.
Jim
-
01-30-2006 08:47 AM #18
you'll are talking 5,000 up rpm. the(way i read it)he is just driving it normal and at idle and should be able to run a 2 bbl. without burning the plugs up. am i reading it wrong?Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
01-30-2006 09:14 AM #19
I also agree with LS1.
I thought by using a smaller carb it would HELP the streetability.
I would think that a smaller one would create better pressure drop in the venturis and therefor pull harder on the jets and pull more fuel.
Obviously this isn't working out as planned or I wouldn't be posting this problem.
-
01-30-2006 09:19 AM #20
Originally posted by tcodi
I also agree with LS1.
I thought by using a smaller carb it would HELP the streetability.
I would think that a smaller one would create better pressure drop in the venturis and therefor pull harder on the jets and pull more fuel.
Obviously this isn't working out as planned or I wouldn't be posting this problem.Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
01-30-2006 09:58 AM #21
I was having some fun with it, but nothing crazy.
just some hard pulls out of some stop signs and maybe
up a couple hills.
I still haven't even given it full throttle though.
-
01-30-2006 01:10 PM #22
Originally posted by tcodi
I was having some fun with it, but nothing crazy.
just some hard pulls out of some stop signs and maybe
up a couple hills.
I still haven't even given it full throttle though.Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
01-30-2006 09:43 PM #23
kLast edited by hambiskit; 01-30-2006 at 10:01 PM.
Jim
-
01-30-2006 10:48 PM #24
Fatten up the jets on the primary side by 0.003" to 0.005". If the motor isn't surging (changing rpm's up and down on its own) in cruise mode, then it isn't too lean, but try the fatter jets just to see what happens. I know you've been changing metering rods, but try jets.
As far as carb size, you are right on the money with what you intend to do with the truck. You'll get great throttle response and manifold vacuum with smaller primary venturis.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
01-30-2006 11:29 PM #25
i thought on you had to change the metering rods with the jets at the same time to properly adjust an edlebrock? or could i have always just been able to swap out the metering rods and be done?just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
-
01-30-2006 11:51 PM #26
No, you can change either or both. I'm just thinkin' that he's probably gettin pretty thin on metering rods and might have some more flexibility if he changes to a fatter jet.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
01-31-2006 05:19 AM #27
yep, you can change either the rods or jets, and you are correct, I am pretty thin now on rods. I have some new jets that are .003 larger that I'm gonna put in tonight.
It isn't surging or anything in cruise though, nor was it even before I went richer.
-
01-31-2006 06:49 AM #28
Originally posted by tcodi
yep, you can change either the rods or jets, and you are correct, I am pretty thin now on rods. I have some new jets that are .003 larger that I'm gonna put in tonight.
It isn't surging or anything in cruise though, nor was it even before I went richer.Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
01-31-2006 05:11 PM #29
just for reference this was the plug before I richened it up a few steps.
-
02-02-2006 07:48 AM #30
one thing I wanted to check on is the large tube connection on the front of the carb that I think is for PCV. I had the carb off last night and saw that this tube has a passage that leads below the throttle plates.
I had it hooked to my valve cover breathers, but wouldn't that line suck with full manifold vacuum on the breathers then?
There is a very similar connection on the rear that I have hooked to my brake booster. But both have passages leading under the throttle plates.
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
Getting closer on this project. What a lot of work!
Stude M5 build