Thread: 460 Panther Marinetec motor
-
04-01-2005 11:16 AM #1
460 Panther Marinetec motor
Hello...another new member knowing nothing about BBF's. I'm hoping someone can provide some much needed info about my 1977' 460 Panther built motor in my boat. The manufacturer is not providing any assistance! I do not know anything about the internal components, cam, pistons, etc. Here's what is visible: Heads - D3VE-A2A, Intake Manifold - ford - DOOE-8425C (7L21), Carb. - holly - 2R-4608. I guess my question is this, is this simply a stock engine with chrome valve covers with Panthers name on them, or has some modifications been done? I realize this is little info and seemingly a stupid post, but you guy's know your stuff and I don't have a clue! Any guess as to the HP output of such an engine, even if stock inside? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated and start me off on my learning curve...I'm reading everything on this site...it's excellent!!!
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
04-01-2005 04:09 PM #2
Intake Manifold Info.
Having found within this site some info on reading motor codes, I've concluded that my intake manifold is a 1970 from either a Fairlane or Torino. The previous one owner of my motor says it's the one that came on the 460 Panther marine motor new in 1977. Why would they use a seven year old manifold design in building a motor for a high dollar boat (in 1977). Where they special in some way?
-
04-05-2005 08:58 PM #3
Originally posted by CV Gwin
I'm hoping someone can provide info about my 1977' 460 Panther built motor in my boat. Here's what is visible: Heads - D3VE-A2A, Intake Manifold - ford - DOOE-8425C (7L21), Carb. - holly - 2R-4608. Any guess as to the HP output of such an engine, even if stock inside? Having found within this site some info on reading motor codes, I've concluded that my intake manifold is a 1970 from either a Fairlane or Torino. The previous one owner of my motor says it's the one that came on the 460 Panther marine motor new in 1977. Why would they use a seven year old manifold design in building a motor for a high dollar boat (in 1977). Where they special in some way?
In stock trim and well tuned, you have perhaps 300HP with thru-transom exhaust, signficantly more with tubular OT headers, maybe over 325HP.
PaulLast edited by Paul Kane; 06-28-2005 at 10:14 PM.
-
04-06-2005 08:53 AM #4
Thank You Paul, I very much appreciate your sharing your time and vast knowledge on Ford engines....thanks again!
300HP (perhaps) is not what I expected. That seems kinda weak for a BB gas drinker like this engine. I truly thought it would be somewhere around 375+. Many friends have 350 SBC that are putting out about 100HP more than my 460 BBF! As you know, the 455 Olds marine engine puts out 390HP. Guess I'll consider swapping out for an Olds marine (plentiful) and gain 100HP cheaper than messing with this BBF. Regardless, I thank the members of this forum for their time and excellent reading!
-
04-06-2005 10:25 AM #5
Originally posted by CV Gwin
Thank You Paul, I very much appreciate your sharing your time and vast knowledge on Ford engines....thanks again!
300HP (perhaps) is not what I expected. That seems kinda weak for a BB gas drinker like this engine. I truly thought it would be somewhere around 375+. Many friends have 350 SBC that are putting out about 100HP more than my 460 BBF! As you know, the 455 Olds marine engine puts out 390HP. Guess I'll consider swapping out for an Olds marine (plentiful) and gain 100HP cheaper than messing with this BBF. Regardless, I thank the members of this forum for their time and excellent reading!
The horsepower rating I gave you is a real world estimate. I am basing it on the notioin that your engine was probably never apart and is over twenty five years old. They were rated higher than what I am stating. The 390HP rating ot the Olds motor is not real world, it's total BS.
I have owned two jet boats with Olds motors and know others that have also owned them and let me tell you, they are known in the jet boat world among most unreliable choice, and for being ticking time bombs. They often spin rod bearings. I am being completley truthful when I tell you that my friend John build his Olds motor 6 times in a row and blew it up six times in a row. Then he bought the 460 Ford, rebuilt it and had a great season last summer.
As lousy as the Olds motor is for a jet boat, one nice feature about them is that they came with rather high compression (in the boats). The Ford engine in your boat has perhaps 8.2:1 compression ratio and therein lies the reality of your horsepower rating, but don't overlook the potential of your engine. My boat has the same block heads and crank as your engine and my boat goes 85 MPH, and produces between 550-600HP naturally aspirated. I don't know of a chevy or olds that could get anywhere close to that utilizing the components that my engine has in it, nor would they be anywhere as reliable.
Getting 375HP from your Ford-powered boat can practially be done in your sleep, and be the most reliable out there of the mtors your mentioned. If you really wanted to go crazy, you could double the HP your engine is putting out now.
Advantages of Ford over Chevy
- The Ford block is finished a little nicer than the chevy; for example, the head bolts are counter bored so if you deck the block you dont have to counter sink/thread chase the holes--already done.
- (people on the boat forum successfully) using blowers and turbos on stock rods.
- large cube stroker cranks from stock oem cranks...
- They have the same canted valve design as the Chevy and the 429/460's are dime-a-dozen everywhere for dirt cheap. And I mean dirt cheap.
- We don't have to search hi and low for a tall deck block, all Fords are "tall" deck [10.300+"]
- ...symmeterical ports for better fuel distribution.
- The Ford cast crank and 2-bolt block power threshhold is alot higher than the BBC.
- BBFs can run bigger cams as it is located higher in the block than the BBC (the BBC cam lobes actually HIT the crank counterweights if you go too big)...
- BBFs have bigger diameter lifters for a more "friendly" cam profile for flat tappet cams...
- BBFs can make good compresson ratios with flat top pistons [chamber CCs range 72cc to 96cc] We don't need huge dome pistons to get a 10.5 to 1 C/R..
- BBFs have a 1.71 rod ratio...
- BBF's make a 514-521-540" engine with stock parts and do it for under 3K...
- many blocks can be bored to 4.500"...put in a 4.500" stroke crank and it makes a 572" engine for just under $3K...can ya do that with a stock block Chevy? (Answer: Hell no. And by the way, unlike the chevy the Ford's block does not nedd to be clearanced for the crankshaft to do this.)
Last edited by Paul Kane; 04-06-2005 at 10:29 AM.
- The Ford block is finished a little nicer than the chevy; for example, the head bolts are counter bored so if you deck the block you dont have to counter sink/thread chase the holes--already done.
-
04-20-2005 02:32 AM #6
The big block ford is going to put out big time torgue compared to the small blocks. Check that out also.
-
05-20-2005 07:50 PM #7
Hello there, Here's my situation. My buddy gave me a Glastron Carlson jet boat. It is an early 80's CVX 20, I think. It needs some work!!! It has a Berkeley jet drive in it that has supposedly been re-built. How can I make sure it is in good shape? Also, just coincidentally, it ran a 455 Olds. It blew up!! My buddy lost interest in the boat. I read your posts about Ford big blocks being reliable, cheap, and easy to hot rod. Will the jet drive hook up to a Ford motor or is it "set up" for an Olds? Also, have always been a fan of big block mopars. How to they stack up in the jet boat world? As you probably have gathered, I know nothing about jet boats, except that they look cool and float!! (I hope). Thank you!!
-
06-07-2005 10:04 AM #8
Originally posted by Neb
My buddy gave me a Glastron Carlson jet boat. It has a Berkeley jet drive in it that has been re-built. How can I make sure it is in good shape? Also, just coincidentally, it ran a 455 Olds. It blew up!! Will the jet drive hook up to a Ford motor or is it "set up" for an Olds? Also, have always been a fan of big block mopars. How to they stack up in the jet boat world? As you probably have gathered, I know nothing about jet boats, except that they look cool and float!! (I hope). Thank you!!
Your best bet is to be lucky enough to find a 460 motor our of a jet boat that has all the marine parts already included. Fact is that if this is your first boat, then it might be a good idea to find a running boat first and learn about what you're getting into. Boats are expensive as a rule.
The absolute cheapest thing to do with that CVX is to rebuild the existing Olds motor...but it will just blow up again...sorry.
Paul
-
06-27-2005 11:17 AM #9
Boat 460
My question is more about my own Reinell Boat. Its a 1988 King Cobra 460. Its rated at 330HP. Is this also basically a car engine placed in my boat or is it of more of a performance mode. Also what cold I do to increase the output of this engine... Thanks for looing.Martin
-
06-28-2005 10:20 PM #10
Panhof,
Your motor is the same internally as the one I describe in my very first post on this thread. All the 460 Marine engines are about the same.
There are several things you could do to increase performance. As delivered the 460 Marine engine has low compression and increasing c/r ratio by way of swapping out heads and/or pistons helps a lot. Adding a camshaft to the increased compression helps also.
Unfortunately these mods require significant engine surgery for the average person; don't know your abilities but some external bolt-ons can help noticably, such as a bigger carbuetor like a 750 or 850 cfm (re-jetting mandatory!) and playing with your distributor's ignition timing (rejettting mandatory!).
Paul
-
07-17-2005 09:01 AM #11
Just send all that ford junk to me, u dont need that old 460,with that old cj intake,ill take it off ur hands,hehe!!!!Thats good stuff right there,mucho horses can be produced from those engines!!!Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
05-15-2006 07:01 PM #12
Originally Posted by CV Gwinjust because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
-
05-15-2006 10:42 PM #13
Originally Posted by Paul KaneLast edited by pat mccarthy; 05-16-2006 at 01:54 AM.
-
05-16-2006 12:26 AM #14
Paul Kane knows what hes talking about and provided valid technical info. Pat the chevy man on the other hand ............. I would provide pat with the link to a ford big block forum so he could make a informed rebutal........but after reading his reply I think conduct could be a issue if I did Pat knows what he is talking about when it comes to building chevy motors and has a shop and nice tools,but may not be up to speed on the latest Ford information.Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
05-16-2006 12:38 AM #15
so the cam hit the counterweight no they hit on if any on the side of the rods the case of the block will hit before the counterweight would hit the cam. swhanlee28 thanks for the nice comments and my tools have work on fords .i have a customer that hase a pull truck that eats 520+ fords and it a 496 kane needs to get up to speed on the chevys i am not saying you can not make fords run BUT if you think you are going to just run one over a chevy and i have no need to get up to speed on the fords i have work on them and valid technical info swhanlee28 you may want to look at my 1600 +post and read back thru some of them on big block chevys? . 600 hp can be done with stock gm big block stock stuff .new ford info?? i can not keep up with all the new chevys heads that have came out in the last two years so do you think the chevy info i know is old news?? why yes it may be 1965 is when they came out but i have built many over 540+ big block chevys and they had 750to 800 lift cams .oh they look better to. swhanlee28 are you selling your chevy truck?and if it was not for the cheap H beams bbc chevy rods you use and the rod bearings you could not cut down your cranks and do it on the cheap?Last edited by pat mccarthy; 05-23-2006 at 04:42 PM.
Getting closer on this project. What a lot of work!
Stude M5 build