Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 72 429 cylinder head
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    cardoc is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    caroline
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 model a
    Posts
    1

    72 429 cylinder head

     



    what exactly is wrong with 72 cylinder heads that make them prone to detonation with high compression ratio(9or10to1) is it the anti reversion humps in the exhaust ports?

  2. #2
    Paul Kane's Avatar
    Paul Kane is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bay Area
    Car Year, Make, Model: Southwind Jet Boat & Dimarco Hydro
    Posts
    326

    Cool

     



    The 1972 production year passenger car head for the 429/460 engines is casting number D2VE-AA. This is the only oem cylinder head that is a true, open chamber head. (All 429/460 heads produced before and after this head are closed chamber heads.) Combustion chamber volume on the D2VE head comes in at about 97-100 cc's or so.

    Ford abandoned the D0VE head due to emmissions reasons and the D2VE head was their initial answer to lower compression. It's overall performance was less than anticipated and so the very next year Ford came out with yet another head, the D3VE-A2A. That head is more like the D0VE head, in that it too is a closed chamber head but Ford simply lowered the combustion chamber into the head about another .100", thereby getting 97cc's that way.

    It seems to be the D2VE's open chamber design that makes them detonation prone/does not work on these engines in a performance application. The closed chamber head allows for the flame front to propagate across the head in a much shorter period of time than the open chamber head, and this translates to more immediate power (torque) and less chance of preignition.

    Sure, with enough anti-knock additive, the D2VE won't ping, but you can bet that on the same engine the other heads will require much less octane booster and will show better torque numbers on the dyno.

    As far as your speculation on the exhaust port goes: ironically, the 1972 D2VE exhaust port is one of Ford's better 429/460 production iron exhaust prots.

    Paul

    429/460 Engine Fanatic

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink