Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 429 or 390 decision needet
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    GTfastbacker's Avatar
    GTfastbacker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany/ u Rope
    Posts
    8

    Question 429 or 390 help needet

     



    Hi Guys,

    im jorg from germany. i own a lot of american cars as 67 Stang Fastback,
    68 Cougar, 65 mustang convertible. 59 Apachie Truck and some more.

    pics of my Rides:









    Now the Problem:

    also i own a 66 galaxie convertible without engine.

    original its a 352 FE but the engine and tranny is missing.

    now i need some help from you:

    i can get a original 1965 390FE with FMX caming out of a S-code 1965 Galaxie, and
    a 1971 429 D1VE 2Barel with C6 caming out of a 71 LTD or T-Bird (not sure).

    whats the better engine?

    i like high torque (remember, its a convertible) and economic in fuel consumption, because i like to drive the car over the summer daylie.

    please can someone help me by decision?

    thanx a lot

    Jorg

    PS. the 429 is ready to run, the 390 needs to rebuild, but no prob for me..
    Last edited by GTfastbacker; 08-04-2008 at 02:13 PM.

  2. #2
    shoprat's Avatar
    shoprat is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 RANCHERO
    Posts
    261

    The FE motor fits the car better. The 429 is large. I have both, I think
    you'd be better off keeping the 390.
    Ron

  3. #3
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    Neither is going to be any great shakes for economy. The 390 bolts right in, and is the better choice, I'd say.

  4. #4
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    Mounts, exhaust system, electrical and cooling all will be more correct with the 390-----

  5. #5
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    As much as I'd like to put a 429 in that car, the 390 is the best choice. I'm surprised that it has an FMX transmission. I would double check that as it might be a Cruise-o-matic. The best of all, the 390 with the C6 (or a 4 speed) ( I had a '65 hardtop XL with the 390/330Hp Police Interceptor, fast car - then I got married )
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  6. #6
    GTfastbacker's Avatar
    GTfastbacker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany/ u Rope
    Posts
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by IC2
    As much as I'd like to put a 429 in that car, the 390 is the best choice. I'm surprised that it has an FMX transmission. I would double check that as it might be a Cruise-o-matic. The best of all, the 390 with the C6 (or a 4 speed) ( I had a '65 hardtop XL with the 390/330Hp Police Interceptor, fast car - then I got married )
    Hi Dave,
    the 4speed (T10) i put in the 68 Cougar. together with a 427 dual quad and a Heidts IFS and 9" Detroit Locker it should bring some smile in my face

    But the Galaxie is the Cruiser. The tranny has a bolted Bell Housing.
    Im not shure, the Cruise-o-matic has it non screwed?

    pict of engine:

    http://img369.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fe390nk7.jpg

    jorg
    Last edited by GTfastbacker; 08-04-2008 at 02:13 PM.

  7. #7
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    Quote Originally Posted by GTfastbacker
    Hi Dave,
    the 4speed (T10) i put in the 68 Cougar. together with a 427 dual quad and a Heidts IFS and 9" Detroit Locker it should bring some smile in my face

    But the Galaxie is the Cruiser. The tranny has a bolted Bell Housing.
    Im not shure, the Cruise-o-matic has it non screwed?

    pict of engine:

    http://img369.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fe390nk7.jpg

    jorg
    Jorg,
    A 427 Cougar - sounds like a Autobahn cruiser - and a surprise to the Porsche driving police

    Nice clean 390 engine - at least physically.

    The FMX didn't come out until '68 (through '81 or '82)which is why I said that I was surprised.

    My guess - a Ford-o-Matic/Cruis-o-Matic transmission

    Take a look here: http://www.charlietranny.com/Fordomatic.htm
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  8. #8
    GTfastbacker's Avatar
    GTfastbacker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany/ u Rope
    Posts
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by IC2
    Jorg,
    A 427 Cougar - sounds like a Autobahn cruiser - and a surprise to the Porsche driving police

    Nice clean 390 engine - at least physically.

    The FMX didn't come out until '68 (through '81 or '82)which is why I said that I was surprised.

    My guess - a Ford-o-Matic/Cruis-o-Matic transmission

    Take a look here: http://www.charlietranny.com/Fordomatic.htm
    Thanks Dave,
    maybe you right, it should be the cruise-o-matic!

    is the C6 better than the Cruise-o-matic?

    we do drive at autobahn up to 90 miles per hour cruising speed
    i have to install a big trannycooler.

    i do have a C6 from 1974 400M but i fear it uses different bolt pattern?


    about the police porsche. i never have seen one of that. maybe its a marketing joke

    but i see in italy a police lamborghini...

    jorg

  9. #9
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    Quote Originally Posted by GTfastbacker
    Thanks Dave,
    maybe you right, it should be the cruise-o-matic!

    is the C6 better than the Cruise-o-matic?

    we do drive at autobahn up to 90 miles per hour cruising speed
    i have to install a big trannycooler.

    i do have a C6 from 1974 400M but i fear it uses different bolt pattern?


    sion that Ford used for years and is an excelaabout the police porsche. i never have seen one of that. maybe its a marketing joke

    but i see in italy a police lamborghini...

    jorg
    Jorg
    The Cruise -o-Matic is not a particularly strong transmission. The C6 is the standard heavy duty transmission choice for long life. I don't believe that the 400M version will fit - this might help:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...using_patterns

    Yes - a police Porsche 911 on the Autobahn is true - I've seen them between Ludwigshafen and Frankfurt but not since the early '90s.
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  10. #10
    GTfastbacker's Avatar
    GTfastbacker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Germany/ u Rope
    Posts
    8

    hey, thank you so much!

    4 votes for the 390 against 0 for the 429.

    thats a clear voting!

    i will grabb the 390......

    jorg

  11. #11
    Paul Kane's Avatar
    Paul Kane is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bay Area
    Car Year, Make, Model: Southwind Jet Boat & Dimarco Hydro
    Posts
    326

    Cool

     



    Well everyone here knows quite well that I will be biased toward the 429.

    The Galaxie will not longer be "original" even with the FE engine. Further, the 390 FE is based on 1950's technology. The 390 needs a rebuild, and if you plan on upgrading engine parts then the FE engine aftermarket engine parts are more expensive, certainly more expensive than the 429 parts, dollar-per-horsepower or otherwise. Lastly, the FMX transmisson has a super heavy cast iron case.

    On the other hand, the 429 is newer technology than the 390, makes much more power than the 390, has the potential to make the greatest power between the two engines, can make much more power per dollar spent, will get no worse fuel economy then the 390, will be slightly more reliable than the 390, and includes a C6 which is a far, FAR superior transmission which, by the way, has an all-aluminum case.

    429/C6 absolutely. Especially when the autobahn becomes part of the equation.

    Paul

    429/460 Engine Fanatic

  12. #12
    Paul Kane's Avatar
    Paul Kane is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bay Area
    Car Year, Make, Model: Southwind Jet Boat & Dimarco Hydro
    Posts
    326

    Cool

     



    Quote Originally Posted by shoprat
    The FE motor fits the car better. The 429 is large....
    Ron
    Quote Originally Posted by R Pope
    The 390 bolts right in, and is the better choice, I'd say.
    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton
    Mounts, exhaust system, electrical and cooling all will be more correct with the 390-----
    All these parts are available to install the 429 into the Galaxie, "correct" or not.

    Paul

    429/460 Engine Fanatic

  13. #13
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    yep and for sort of the same tech and type of engine put a BBC in the car---only difference between the 429 and BBC is the BBC has forged steel cranks, better bearing sizes and easily more available lite weight parts such as heads----only draw back is the distributor is in the back

    you have a nice good looking car that is 40 years old---maqke it as original as you can and I agree use the C6 trans

  14. #14
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    Paul

    I put the first 460/C6 combo into a 1970 Ford F250 replacing a FE360---what a difference----I could pull our race trailer faster than the truck would run before!!!!It took Ford ( after many of there engineers saw it) three years to come out with it and then then discontinued it in 1980 for a while-----then after suffering with a 400 cleveland for a while I bought a Chevy crew cab ( something else ford was on/off with year to year) until I went 7.3 diesel in 1995

  15. #15
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton
    yep and for sort of the same tech and type of engine put a BBC in the car---only difference between the 429 and BBC is the BBC has forged steel cranks, better bearing sizes and easily more available lite weight parts such as heads----only draw back is the distributor is in the back
    yep and the deck is 9.800 on the bbc and the ford is 10.300 less you go 10.200 bbc for a 632 donovan dry sump in it can you say hello autobahn
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 08-05-2008 at 08:06 PM.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink