Thread: FE Flaws & Questions
-
01-14-2005 05:27 PM #16
my dad has a 57 thunderbird that i know a lot of people drag race but i didn't want to mess that car up to let the import people know their cars suck since that car is worth a lot of money restored i've never once heard of someone dragracing a 66 thunderbird~:low budget baby:~
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-14-2005 05:49 PM #17
I've known a few that upgraded the exaust. They never dragged the cars as pro's but just for fun and to get them to run better. If your working at the speed shop maybe the owner can help you fab some from scratch with header kits. This would be the cheapest way. The CJ manifolds were a easy way too but the cost for them now is outragous. Are you planning a rebuild on the engine??
-
01-14-2005 06:03 PM #18
yeah as soon as i get the cash i am gona rebuild the engine with J&E high compression pistons and make it a 12.5 compression ratio and throw a steel crank in and sum connecting rods make it real nice. i'm not planning on going all out drag because i want something that will get me to school and back (not as a daily driver though) and i'd like to have a lot of power, a stock interior (cept for a B&M shifter), and sum tires that will stick so i can hardly spin them~:low budget baby:~
-
01-14-2005 06:13 PM #19
If your looking at cranks check out the Scats. Keep in mind they are not forged steel but cast steel. Iron in other words like the nodular iron OEM's. Still nice and not a bad deal for $500. Also if a Forged steel 427 3.78 stroke crank is what your after keep in mind your 390 iron crank is good to around 800 hp and is the same stroke. You can always pickup a 428 3.98 crank for a 410 cu and save a little or go all out on a 4.125 or 4.25 Scat and use a BBC size rod. G.
-
01-14-2005 08:19 PM #20
I show a '65-'69 390-428 "Passenger car" Header listing in my Hooker book Pn# 6130. I have a feeling it may be for a Galixie or something other than a T-bird. You might want to call Summit or call Hooker and Headman Directly to see what's available.Dan Ouellette
'25 T C-Cab
'47 Ford Coupe
'53 Ford Crestline
'53 Ford Mainline
-And 8 more Fords and 2 Mopars
-
01-15-2005 12:01 AM #21
headers from a falcon will fit yes... the tbird has a bigger engine bay with a little more space... but depending on which stearing setup you have, you might have to pull your collumn and steering box to get thru without pulling the engine...does it have a steering ram or does it have a contained box?.... depending on your headers, you may also have to get a steering ram drop bracket.... which is a little jankey of a setup IMO....
for an oil pan, check Ebay... i got a morroso 10qt for my 390 in my galaxie for $129... if U stick with a stock pan, you can get a nice cromed thick steel oil pan from specter for $79.99......i also reccomend switching to oil pan studs instead of using the bolts... makes lining the pan/gasket up SO easy.... just remember to use bolts still where the pan fits up to the timing chain cover... or else you're going to run into problems when U goto pull your timing chain cover someday... also, since you're planning on running some hefty power out of that engine... i reccomend changing from the standard timing chain to either a gear drive or a double roller setup... it'll keep you from getting chain slack and loosing cam timing and possibly blowing your valve train to pieces...
another problem with running high performance, is that if you're running the original 2 piece valves.... you could really risk some fatal engine problems.... at 6000+ rpms those valves will sometimes come apart and go right thru the cylinder walls.... valves will cost you about $100-130... getting your heads machined and having hardened valve seats installed will cost you another $75-150 depending on if U have a good machine shop connection or not...
-
01-15-2005 09:36 AM #22
yeah the place i work at in the summer does all of that stuff and may-B they can teach me to do it and i can do it for free i also have a shop over on the family farm with as much stuff to work on engines as most costomizing shops (don't have the machining tools but everything else) i am also prob. not gona rev it over 6500 RPMs because my ignition is set up for up to 6000 RPMs and i was looking in the summit racing magazine at sum timing gears and was thinking about gettin one of those cause the timing chain in there is pretty old and worn
thx for the help with the falcon headers i might see if i can get a pair for cheap and put sum Mr.Gasket exaust cut-outs with the cord to open them in the interior, behind them (i want the engine to be nice and quiet till i open up the cut-outs)~:low budget baby:~
-
01-15-2005 09:38 AM #23
you guys really know your stuff!!!~:low budget baby:~
-
01-15-2005 11:25 AM #24
Hey Denny did you ever finish your drawings of the head drainbacks we talked about a few months ago? Let me know please as I'm still very interested in seeing what you did. Thanks. G.
-
01-15-2005 04:29 PM #25
No problem and thanks for the update and your time. G.
-
03-01-2005 03:46 PM #26
if you want traction run a locker some 3.73 or 3.55 gears and a four link suspension. with the tranny throw in a manual valve body and that should do ya goodif you see me you'll know
bad a** boys drive bad a** toys
-
03-01-2005 08:41 PM #27
Re: FE Flaws & Questions
Originally posted by Ksbsn88
i am new to the forum and i have a 66 thunderbird with a 390FE (with a couple performance parts) i have been building for the past year to show the ricers at my school how pathetic their cars are. So here are a few questions i would like to ask.
1. what the biggest flaws are on my engine were.
After 32 years with FE motors (over 40 if you count my Dad's cars), my biggest complaint about the FE motors has been the way the heads, block, and intake come together. Just about a guaranteed oil leak back in the days before blue glue. So use blue glue on the intake manifold, and go a little heavy on the head surface at the points where everything comes together
2. is there anything that i can do besides taking off the emitions from the carb. for free cause i'm on a little tiny wee budget since i am only 16.
Engine size (cid) x max. rpm/3456 =cfm
@100% VE (volume efficiency)
Example: 350 cid x 6,000 rpm = 210,000/3456 = 608cfm
Yours works out to about 587CFM at 100% efficiency. Takes a real big cam for that to work, and forced induction to get over 100%. See http://www.secoperformance.com/Tech_Corner_May2.htm for all the details. Too much carb can hurt. I have a friend with a 327 Camaro, big hydraulic cam, 850 Holley, who tells me my 735 Holley on the 428CJ is too small. But I can do 100 ft big smokey burnouts on the shift to second, uphill, with the automatic. Turn 6000-6200 RPM with balanced/blueprinted CJ. You probably won't exceed 5200 until you do some freshening up. Not a problem.
3. what are the most ineffecient parts on my engine.
4. will headers from a galaxy fit on a 66 thunderbird
5. is it street legal to run an exaust cut-out on an engine that does not need to pass emitions
6. is it legal to run a electric fuel pump bolted in the rear wheel well where it has no chance of hitting anything
7. how hard is it to tub out a car
8. can you buy drag radials with white walls
9. how hard is it to put a stall torque converter between a 390 and a C6
10. are the stock exaust manifolds as restrictive as they really look and how hard are they to change for headers
11. how expensive is it to get my heads ported by someone who knows what they are doing and do you have to pull the engine to take the heads off
12. Does the 390 have a mechanical lift camshaft or a hydrolic
13. does the 390 have a dry sump oil pump or a wet sump
14. is a high volume oil pump better than a high pressure pump
15. how easy is it to change the oil pump because i do not feel comfortable with a 30 year old stock oil pump
16. how do i make my holley "blue" electric fuel pump quieter
Horsepower to weight. Example: A college kid, new in town, with Daddy's '70 Chevelle SS396 and his girlfriend alongside, gave me a ration while I was sitting, leathered out, on my bagger Harley. 800 lb of bike, 70 or so horsepower, lotsa chrome and saddlebags and all, and an old fat man sitting atop it. Light changed, he laid down a couple hundred miles worth of rubber, and never saw anything but taillights from my stock Hog. Assume I was 1000 lbs, and 70HP. He was probably 4000 lbs and 250HP (rear wheels - let's keep this even). He was 16 lbs per HP. I was more like 14. I didn't break traction. I didn't break 3500 RPM. I had 88 cubic inches, and he had 396. Just how it is. The Lightning pickups would probably beat my 428CJ in a drag (maybe not - supposed to top 500HP with the work on it). Make yourself happy, and go for cool.Last edited by SnakeHerder; 03-01-2005 at 11:21 PM.
Tim -
"Tho' much is taken, much abides, and tho'
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are..."
-
03-01-2005 10:17 PM #28
The T-Bird is a unit body car, relying on the whole lower side of the body for strength,,,I have a 62 and a 64,,,,,,When the guy's say ,,,upgrade your cooling system,,,they are correct,,,,these cars where luxury cruisers and not meant for race application,,,i would add some kind of reinforcement to the rear suspension connects to the frame,,,,,and as far as your exhaust goes,,,,,the T-Birds where alway's difficult to modify,,,because of the almost custom fit of the pipes to the body,,,headers are going to be a problem to fit,,unless you get a custom set made up.....off hand i dont know if you can use headers from any other car,,,,,,changing the cam to one a little more radical will help alot,,,,the carbs are pretty much well balanced for the engine from stock,,,over carburation will be a big problem without the addition of a higher lift cam.
My son's T-Bird (64) is getting the flat black treatment and flames,,,with wide whites,,,,and satin treatment to the chrome to dull it out a bit.
Edelbrock used to make a torquer 360 deg, 4bbl manifold which would just clear the hood profile.
We are also going with a 4 core radiator,,and electric fan,,,and 120amp alternator ( he say's he'll need it to power his subs ) maybee a shift kit,,,,,,,,and keeping the wire wheel covers.
Sounds like your car is gonna be one sweet machine when it's done though."I don't know everything and i like it that way"
-
03-01-2005 11:06 PM #29
'64 probably has the "old" Cruise-o-matic. Didn't the C6 start in 1966? Anyway, I was trying to remember if they were unit body - that was my recollection. I didn't want to ride him about the big carb, but I'm afraid you're right about the overcarburetion.
Do you think there's any chance the '67-'70 Mustang headers would work? I'm afraid the steering's in the wrong place, but that's the only thing I can think of that might come close...
Branda sells the repop of the aluminum PI manifold, if you can't find the Edelbrock or Offy or anything on eBay or such. It isn't cheap, but it's a good one. Probably need a low-profile air cleaner for hood clearance, don't you think?Tim -
"Tho' much is taken, much abides, and tho'
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are..."
-
03-01-2005 11:51 PM #30
Didn't ever lose a gasket through slip-out. Just always had a weep/leak where the valve cover, intake, and head came together. The head and intake top surfaces didn't ever align perfectly, and the valve cover gasket didn't like that "step" between the two. The silicone blue glue seems to span that like the old red Form-a-Gasket didn't.
But I like the roll pins! Great improvement for that big span. I'll keep that trick in mind.Tim -
"Tho' much is taken, much abides, and tho'
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are..."
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird