Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: 500 hp/550 lb-ft from a 390?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 68

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy View Post
    general kinetics were good cams in there day. that guy that started GK work for ford and started his own cam grinding company . i can not think of his name right now it was in detroit
    I think maybe that was Harold Brookshire.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  2. #2
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
    I think maybe that was Harold Brookshire.
    no don tewless
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  3. #3
    vara4's Avatar
    vara4 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1947 International Pick Up
    Posts
    3,188

    I know they ground me a cam that ran High 9's with the linelock locked up!!!
    That was in a mustang with a 351C in it.
    They had ground me the same cam Bob Glidden was using back in 73
    when he won the world championship.
    Glidden was using a destroked 351C down to about 330 and it was not long before we found out why he destroked it. We kept cracking blocks in the lifter galley with the higher RPM's. I imagine the shorter stroke stop the craking there.
    We ended up going with a smaller cam and lowering the RPM's below 7,500 to stop the craking. I guess the destroking took alot of stress off the blocks for Glidden.
    Kurt

  4. #4
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by vara4 View Post
    I know they ground me a cam that ran High 9's with the linelock locked up!!!
    That was in a mustang with a 351C in it.
    They had ground me the same cam Bob Glidden was using back in 73
    when he won the world championship.
    Glidden was using a destroked 351C down to about 330 and it was not long before we found out why he destroked it. We kept cracking blocks in the lifter galley with the higher RPM's. I imagine the shorter stroke stop the craking there.
    We ended up going with a smaller cam and lowering the RPM's below 7,500 to stop the craking. I guess the destroking took alot of stress off the blocks for Glidden.
    Kurt
    my older engine builder buddy used GK cams. when you talk about cams to him harold B name would pop up . i do not know if harold in is very early days if he work at GK ? i think he did work for comp in the early 80s ?
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  5. #5
    Johan78 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    sverige
    Posts
    10

    Just wondering one thing. Speed Pro piston is designed for connecting rods that are 6.480.
    Are they not 6.490? Maybe it doesnt matter?

    Johan

  6. #6
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by Johan78 View Post
    Just wondering one thing. Speed Pro piston is designed for connecting rods that are 6.480.
    Are they not 6.490? Maybe it doesnt matter?

    Johan
    When you are sitting down to engineer all the parts that will make your motor work like you want it to, you determine the static compression ratio and squish you want to use in the motor, then purchase parts to reach those specifications.

    Let's say for instance, that you wanted to achieve a squish of 0.040". OK, we know the block deck height is ~10.170", so we have to put together a stack of parts and adjust the block deck height to achieve a zero deck to do this. The thickness of the gasket then becomes the squish figure. So, with a stack of parts like this.....stroke radius 1.890", rod length nominally 6.490" (can vary from 6.486" to 6.490" in production rods) and piston compression height of 1.776", we would add all the stack pieces together and find that we have a stack of 10.156" So, in order to achieve a zero deck, we would have to shave the block decks 0.014". If the rods were actually 6.480", then the stack would be 10.146" and you'd have to cut the block decks 0.024" to achieve a zero deck.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  7. #7
    Flatheadwillie is offline CHR Junior sMember Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1

    I know this forum is older than dirt...but I am another newb building a 390...just wondering why that C8AX-6250-C cam was never mentioned
    Last edited by Flatheadwillie; 04-11-2013 at 07:02 PM.

  8. #8
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by Flatheadwillie View Post
    I know this forum is older than dirt...but I am another newb building a 390...just wondering why that C8AX-6250-C cam was never mentioned
    After re-factoring the flow of the Edelbrock heads, based on Barry's experience with hard dyno pulls with these motors, I ran a Sim on this cam. Best results were achieved with the cam retarded 4 degrees on these 0.050" marks....
    IO (-5)
    IC (45)
    EO (52
    EC (-2)
    RPM....HP....TQ
    2000...166...436
    2500...208...436
    3000...263...460
    3500...330...495
    4000...397...521
    4500...447...521
    5000...492...517
    5500...505...482
    6000...485...425
    Peak volumetric efficiency 101.8% @5000
    Peak BMEP 198.8 lbs @4500
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  9. #9
    slincoln 3 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ocean City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 LTD,76 Cordoba,71 Mark iii
    Posts
    86

    I'm new to this forum but not to Fords or the mighty FE engine. I have a 1969 Ford LTD 427 Cobra clone. It still has its 390 though its dressed up as a 427. I don't have all the specific details as I had the work done at local speed shop. It has a high lift cam,aluminum intake,700 cfm carb.,head work,electronic billet distributor,long tube headers and dynoed at 451hp. The secret to 390 is torque as its no high revving engine,get a nice gear 3:89 or 4:11,posi unit,stall 2000-2500,shift kit,sticky tires and spank some Chevy butt. I beat a ton of cars with more hp than me. I get them out the hole and they never catch me!!! I run 2200 stall and 275/60/15 Cooper Cobra's. Good luck but you won't need it!!!

  10. #10
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,752

    While it's great that you replied.. the last post was almost a year ago! And you're right, the FE's were torque motors.

  11. #11
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,752

    Dang = That's Purty! Welcome to the club..

  12. #12
    Jeff Perkins is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Conyers
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mustang Coupe
    Posts
    26

    Funny how the world works....I've spent the past two weeks revisiting this build. The bottom end is going together at the shop and I literally, just last night, drilled the lowering holes and installed the upper control arms.

    I got distracted by building a couple of businesses and a career. Believe it or not this one isn't as dead as one might think.

    I'll post a few pics at some point today, at least of the suspension. The engine assembly is being documented fairly thoroughly by the shop I engaged to do that and we'll have actual dyno numbers to look at.

    Again, how strange the world can be...

    Cheers

    Jeff
    JL350 and stovens like this.

  13. #13
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,752

    Hi Ya Jeff. Yep, sometimes we are the last to know what's coming next right??
    Can't wait to see the pics.. been so long I've forgotten what the motor was going into.
    A Mustang perhaps?

  14. #14
    Jeff Perkins is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Conyers
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mustang Coupe
    Posts
    26

    Loading pics from a phone is obviously a pain....I'll need to transfer to a computer and figure it out from there....gimme a minute...

    And yes, the car is a Mustang. 1967 Coupe.
    34_40 and stovens like this.

  15. #15
    Jeff Perkins is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Conyers
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mustang Coupe
    Posts
    26

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/rwb74mabr4...25542.jpg?dl=0


    Try the link above for a pic of the suspension....I'm apparently not bright enough to upload a picture here. Nevermind the fact that I build communications networks nationally...

Reply To Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink