Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: My 1st motor buildup
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    user101 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Walnut
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 Mustang coupe
    Posts
    9

    My 1st motor buildup

     



    Its the 289 i pulled from my mustang. It is bored .60 over with a Edelbrock cam, lifters, 500cfm carb, crane cams pushrods and valve springs, harland sharp roller rockers, 7 qt. moroso oil pan, and hooker headers.
    65 Mustang Coupe 289

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Well done!!! If it runs as good as it looks it will be a great motor!!! When does it get installed and fired????
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    53fatfndr's Avatar
    53fatfndr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Caldwell
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Ford F-100
    Posts
    211

    Looks great! What brand of rockers did you go with?
    Last edited by 53fatfndr; 09-20-2005 at 05:35 PM.

  4. #4
    SBC's Avatar
    SBC
    SBC is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Magnolia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Chevy Nova 283 4-spd
    Posts
    443

    i like the fact that you didn't 'over carb' the motor as so many do.

    bert
    There is no limit to what a man can do . . . if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. (Ronald Reagan)

  5. #5
    user101 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Walnut
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 Mustang coupe
    Posts
    9

    Dave- it'll prolly be a few more months before its installed.

    53fatfndr-I went with Harland Sharp rockers from Jegs.

    SBC-I'm glad somone agreed with me. I've had a lot of people tell me i needed to put a 650 on it but i usually just give them a look about like this....
    65 Mustang Coupe 289

  6. #6
    53fatfndr's Avatar
    53fatfndr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Caldwell
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Ford F-100
    Posts
    211

    Originally posted by user101
    SBC-I'm glad somone agreed with me. I've had a lot of people tell me i needed to put a 650 on it but i usually just give them a look about like this....
    Those are the same people that don't realize how stupid they are when it's just simple math that chooses the proper carb size. Go too big and your just wasting money, in more ways than one

    I like those Harland Sharps. Any idea on the power output? Do you know anybody that has experience with that Edelbrock cam? I'm gearing up to do a 302 of mine in the next few years...just gathering information as I go along.....same family as your 289.

  7. #7
    user101 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Walnut
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 Mustang coupe
    Posts
    9

    Originally posted by 53fatfndr
    Those are the same people that don't realize how stupid they are when it's just simple math that chooses the proper carb size. Go too big and your just wasting money, in more ways than one

    I like those Harland Sharps. Any idea on the power output? Do you know anybody that has experience with that Edelbrock cam? I'm gearing up to do a 302 of mine in the next few years...just gathering information as I go along.....same family as your 289.
    It seems like the H.S. put out a 20-30% increase in power(i could be wrong tho). I dont know anyone that has experience with the cam.

    Can anyone shoot me a ballpark number on the horsepower and torque i should have with this setup.

    Also I'll be running a 16in. rim with a 225/60 tire. will the 60 be wide enough to put the power to the ground or should i go to a 55.
    65 Mustang Coupe 289

  8. #8
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    you probably really only gained about 30 or so HP off of that which would put you in a ballpark of 240-260 depending on what heads you have and so forth.... congrats on a first time motor build.... i remember mine.... i ended up having to rebuild it a few days after i fired it up.... and find a new crank
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  9. #9
    user101 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Walnut
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 Mustang coupe
    Posts
    9

    Originally posted by thesals
    you probably really only gained about 30 or so HP off of that which would put you in a ballpark of 240-260 depending on what heads you have and so forth.... congrats on a first time motor build.... i remember mine.... i ended up having to rebuild it a few days after i fired it up.... and find a new crank
    what happened????
    65 Mustang Coupe 289

  10. #10
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Originally posted by user101
    It seems like the H.S. put out a 20-30% increase in power(i could be wrong tho). I dont know anyone that has experience with the cam.

    Can anyone shoot me a ballpark number on the horsepower and torque i should have with this setup.

    Also I'll be running a 16in. rim with a 225/60 tire. will the 60 be wide enough to put the power to the ground or should i go to a 55.
    The 50 and 60 do not designate the width of the tread. The first number (235) indicates the tread width in millimeters. The 50/60 is the aspect ratio, or the ratio of the height of the tire from the bead to the tread surface divided by the section width (widest point of the tire). If a tire is 300 millimeters section width and 150 millimeters from bead to tread, you would divide 150 by 300 and come up with a figure of .50, or 50 series. If the tire is 300 millimeters section width and 180 millimeters from bead to tread, you would divide 180 by 300 and come up with .60, or 60 series. The larger the series number, the softer the ride will be, but you will give up cornering ability. A 75 series tire will give you a great ride, but it will roll over on itself if you try some serious cornering with it. A 40 or 35 series tire will corner better, but the ride quality suffers. Hope this helps.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  11. #11
    docone31 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Tampa
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Chevy Van-G20
    Posts
    106

    Hey user, that is one real clean build up! I like that. I bet you put time on the inside as well as the outside. That is one sweet looking engine.

  12. #12
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    Originally posted by user101
    what happened????
    the guy who did the machine work... didn't get all the glass beads out of it when he put the crank in.... which i woulda prefered to do myself.... but just one glass bead can destroy an engine
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  13. #13
    carbuff is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    kearney
    Car Year, Make, Model: Anything non-chebby
    Posts
    65

    cool

     



    nice motor, are those aluminum heads? they sure look like it
    Just my 2 pennies though

  14. #14
    user101 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Walnut
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 Mustang coupe
    Posts
    9

    Re: cool

     



    Originally posted by carbuff
    nice motor, are those aluminum heads? they sure look like it
    no, they are 302 heads.
    65 Mustang Coupe 289

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink