Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: should i get a cam ?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    merc53man is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    reno
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1953 mercury hardtop + '56 chev p/u
    Posts
    93

    should i get a cam ?

     



    I AM LOOKING TO GET A REBUILT 302 TO MUT IN ME 53 MERC. NO REAL INTERNAL MODS TO IT. PROBABLY JUST HEADERS, INTAKE, AND A HOLLEY 570 CARB PROBABLY. IM WONDERING IF I WILL NOTICE A WORTHY DIFFERENCE IF I GO FOR A MILD CAM UPGRADE FROM STOCK ?

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    If you do decide to change the cam, stay with something conservative that will work with a stock-type compression ratio. For instance, this cam is designed to work with c.r. from 8.0:1 up to 9.5:1 and it's a dual pattern cam, meaning there is more duration and lift on the exhaust side than there is on the intake side. You need that feature with stock-type heads because of the abysmal exhaust ports. It's ground on a 112 degree LSA, so idle would be smooth and there should be ample manifold vacuum to operate brakes and other vacuum-driven accessories. I'm not saying that you should buy this particular cam, I'm just using it to make a point. Call your favorite cam grinder and ask for a recommendation.
    http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    timothale's Avatar
    timothale is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    castroville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 16 t buckethotrod 17 horsless carriaget
    Posts
    170

    sbford cam

     



    The 5.0 ho motors used a Marine (Boat engine) cam thad has the 351 firing order and roller timing chains. they work Ok the spark plug wires have to be changed around to match the H O firing order the new firing order puts less strain on the crankshaft at 7 & 8 the cam gave mor horse power and still passed smog.
    timothale

  4. #4
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    5.0 h.o. only had the marine cam 3 years, in 87 they switched to the hydraulic roller which gave more power to the motor but kept the 351 firing order....
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink