Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Bad cam/crank sensor?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    Bad cam/crank sensor?

     



    Hi guys,

    I have a 94 Thunderbird 4.6L V8, and I have a few issues. First of all, say I start the car, drive it for 20 mins, kill it, and go restart it 30 mins later, she won't start. If she gets cold, she will start again. Also, while I'm driving it, if i push the gas pedal gradually, it will sputter(rpm goes up and down by 200) and eventually she will get up to speed. I have replaced both coil packs, plugs, wires and still a problem. Now, under heavy acceleration, she even backfires. To me it feels like a missfire, like a timing issue or something. No diagnostic trouble codes were set. I heard that the 4.6 is notorius for crank sensors, however, if i'm doing one, mind as well do the other too(cam sensor). Any ideas guys?
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  2. #2
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    Would you hint towards theTPS even though it sometimes surges at idle too?
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  3. #3
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    I tested everything, besides the cam crank sensor. Ok, what happens is, when it won't start(cranks over, and it won't fire), its got gas pressure, no vacuum leaks, cylinder compression i good(at least thats what my co-workers say). Now, the thing it doesn't have is spark. After it cools down, it fires right up. At my shop I've had a car that would die while driving and wouldn't start until it has cooled down. The answer was a crank sensor. I'm going to take my chances tomorrow, and see what happens after i change the sensors on the Thunderchicken(common sense to change them every once in a while). I'll keep you posted. Thanks for the hint, i'll check that first thing.
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  4. #4
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    I did it the old school way. Grabbed a prybar, and while the car was running, i tapped the crank sensor, and yes it stalled. I changed the sensor, and now there still is a minor missfire, but, i ordered a TPS and i will put the cam sensor in also. Do you know where that TPS is located? On the throttle body?
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  5. #5
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    ussually opposite side of the throttle cables, the shaft goes into it... on some cars you may have to adjust the sensor position.....
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  6. #6
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    OK, I replaced the crank sensor, TPS, cam sensor, and the missfire is gone, BUT...something I have never noticed before, i believe the catalytic converter is clogged or gone. My exhaust sys is like this:1 cat per each pipe coming out of the manifolds, then there is a joiner catalytic converter, a resonator and then my pipes(no more mufflers). Now, the cat that is from the bank of cylinders #1,2,3,4 rattles when you bang on it with your fist. The joiner cat rattles too. I believe that would be a part of my hesitation or stumble upon my acceleration too. I can hear it in the exhaust pipes when u push it hard. I believe I have old broken parts in the cats that block the exhaust gasses from passing freely. Any ideas?
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  7. #7
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    I know you might say its the heat shields, but no, its not the heat shields fault. They still have the good original welds.If I'm gonna punch them through I'm going to have no back pressure
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  8. #8
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    well.... if you hooked up to a smog machine and gave me some readings i could tell you if the cats are any good, but thats about the only way to tell.... according to the state of california a cat is considered damaged the second exhaust passes thru it
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  9. #9
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    What readings do you guys have in California? Over here in Canada we have readings for NOx, CO, HC. I just ran my car on the dyno for an emission test(i'm licensed), and it did alright. I think that for NOx the limit was 400 and i had like 215 or something. That was the only bad readings. The others were just fine and dandy.
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  10. #10
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    high NOx is not bad cats, bad cats will you give you high hydrocarbon levels with the CO high as well.... high nox alone ussually is a dirty EGR or MAF sensor thats not doing what it should cause its all dirtied up.......but can also be caused by sensors in open loop we have the same readings here in california except we're much more strict on a vehicle when it comes in for emissions testing..... i'm a licensed smog tech here but i just left the automotive business to work in real estate doing mortgages....... theres a lot of that money out there right now so i gotta get it while i can
    Last edited by thesals; 09-29-2006 at 10:47 AM.
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  11. #11
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    Yeah, I hear ya, i feel the same, but, I'm still young, and I love working on cars, so I wanna carry on with it for a bit. Ok, I checked the readings on the sheet again, and it turns out its not NOx, its HC. So that would point out a bad cat. I'm gonna call my piping/cat place tomorrow, because apparently they have updates for the exhaust, and instead of 3 cats, it's going to be only one, with slots for the O2 sensors.
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  12. #12
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    nice..... how strict are smog laws in canada? i know here in california we have the most strict out of the entire US.... its really difficult to get an older car to pass.... luckily we dont have to smog anything 74 or older though.... i know none of my cars would pass
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  13. #13
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    Well, the limits are pretty tight, for ehample my 91 Caprice wouldn't pass, so i just put it on the dyno, and adjusted the timing, pulled out the EGR, and eventually she passed. I know, "cheating is wrong". Cars that are exempt from E-tests are cars that are 20 years old or more, so for example, cars that were born in 86, are exempt from the test. I want to buy a 83 Cutlass Supreme after I'm done with the thunderchicken.
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

  14. #14
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    sounds similar to our system on strictness.... we were supposed to goto the 20 years thing like 10 years ago, but you know how liberal tree hugger commies are.....
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  15. #15
    vdorobantu is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 Ford Mustang LX
    Posts
    83

    Yeah, I hear you buddy. It is a pretty stupid thing to do with these emission tests, because the real issues are the big diesel rigs, busses and others. Those are bad for the environment, not our little engines. Just another way for the goverment to make money
    If you wanna go fast, go ahead, it's your expensive gas you are wasting

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink