Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 32 Roadster Identification
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    Well that is my first mistake this year. I yield to Mick and Bob. I understand about the "parallelogram" aspect of the four bar link and we do seem to agree that the I-beam can twist a bit (although I find it hard to believe it flexes more than a few thousanths of an inch). Anyway I went through that thought process backwards intending to use split wishbones first from a Model A front end and then considered a '40 Ford front end so I have been thinking I-beam all along. When two Model A frames turned out to have rust problems I bit the bullet for a Brookville frame which arrived with a four bar set up and I purchased a 5" drop I-beam so now I have an I-beam four bar which is OK as far as I can tell. So a four bar set up is OK with either tube or I-beam axels but the tube does need the four bar for less stress. The way I got to this thinking error was in considering split wishbones to save money and in either case ('40 or Model A) the "knuckle" of the wishbone on the axel boss would have provided a twist on a tube axel which the four bar is designed to eliminate or reduce. I note that the original stock Ford front end mounting placed the wishbone center on a "ball joint" to allow side-to-side play and that it is the act of splitting the wishbones that causes the axel twist. Apparently the four bar mount solves this problem and the main cause for alarm is the split wishbone configuration. Sorry about the confusion.

    Don Shillady
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder
    Last edited by Don Shillady; 07-06-2011 at 03:02 PM.

  2. #17
    gearjammer's Avatar
    gearjammer is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Troy
    Posts
    18

    Well guys I found out where my roadster came from, teh kit was purchased from HB Classic Street Rods. The body was built by Heritage in 94, the chassis was built by Williams Street Rods in 95 and the car has sit till I picked it up.

    I see I have a lot of work ahead of me, and Dave my 1st. leg in this build will be to remove the body and verify the chassis squareness and go from there.

    Thanks again for all you thoughts, wishes and help

    Phil

  3. #18
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    Not too bad a combination. The original Heritage wasn't a bad body tho after a couple of new owners in the past few years, the quality began to suffer(being kind!!). They may be gone now. Williams is still around though I have no knowledge of what they are doing and the quality of their products.

    Really doesn't make any difference. You own it and we'll help you spend your hard earned dollars building the car.
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink