Thread: 32 Roadster Identification
Hybrid View
-
07-05-2011 07:12 PM #1
Depending on how much you paid it seems like a good start. Dave/IC2 has made some good comments which I agree with but I thought it was old school engineering to only use a tube front axel with hairpin radius rods. With a four bar set up there will be a twisting force on the axel when one wheel dips more than the other. A standard I-beam axel can provide that flexibility while a tube axel is more rigid and may eventually crack under severe use. The formula I learned was to use hairpin radius rods with a tube axel so the hairpins would flex or use an I-beam axel with a four bar setup. Since you have the four bar set up it might be a good idea to swap out the tube axel for an I-beam. Perhaps others here can comment as to whether they have ever seen a tube axel crack when mounted in a four bar geometry. Even so you have a very good start on a classic roadster!
Don Shillady
Retired Scientist/teen rodder
-
07-05-2011 10:38 PM #2
Don, I believe the popular consensus is to use hairpins with I-beam axles and 4-bars with tube axles.
The 4-bars form a parallelagram (?) and don't put twist in the tube axle while an I-beam will twist a bit and not put undo stress on the single mounting point of the hairpin.
I'm no front end expert but have always run them this way.
Mick
So sad, sorry to hear it.
We Lost a Good One