Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Gas mileage king ;)
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 53
  1. #16
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    youve made me a happy man tonight ! 4100 is less then i payed for my 4 wheeler<6k> thats depressing!


    Quote Originally Posted by PatMonaco
    IC2...you're correct! Their estimates on everything back then was way off.

    I bought a brand new 1969 Z-28 with a 302 cu.in. ($4100 out the door with 4:10's) and they rated the horsepower at 290. That thing, totally stock would pull the front wheels!

    Pat
    Last edited by gassersrule_196; 10-27-2007 at 04:03 PM.

  2. #17
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    Gas milage has got as much to do with how you drive as what you are driving.Turbo fours can really drink gas too,if you have to keep it up on boost.A big boat like an old Cadillac sedan with a 472 can give 20-22 mpg when driven modestly. Hank

  3. #18
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    MY 78 bird with a 305 gets 18 MPG @ 80 MPH. But that number was generated a few years ago. Since then I have changed the rear from 2.56 to 2.41 and put many miles on the motor. Would be intresting to run the numbers again, but not too intrested in going back to Nevada to run out two tanks of gas @ 80MPH. However, it was the absolute NICEST cop I have ever had give me a ticket. Nice, guy, really.
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  4. #19
    MattC is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    24

    Post

     



    Back in early 1983 the late & legendary Smokey Yunick fitted a 150 bhp 2 cylinder engine, of his own design, to a Plymouth Horizon test vehicle producing class leading power and fuel efficiency. There was a presentation to the Society of Automotive Engineers and talks with manufacturers for gasoline and diesel applications. I wonder whatever became of that? I suspect interest died out because by 1985/86 gas was cheap again.

  5. #20
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by MattC
    Back in early 1983 the late & legendary Smokey Yunick fitted a 150 bhp 2 cylinder engine, of his own design, to a Plymouth Horizon test vehicle producing class leading power and fuel efficiency. There was a presentation to the Society of Automotive Engineers and talks with manufacturers for gasoline and diesel applications. I wonder whatever became of that? I suspect interest died out because by 1985/86 gas was cheap again.
    Probably didn't have enough torque to pull anything of that day. Every car was a boat in the 80's. Would of been great in a CRX.

  6. #21
    Troglodyte's Avatar
    Troglodyte is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    gig harbor,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chev Convert, 62 Stude GT Hawk, 64 Ve
    Posts
    305

    well, no matter how I drive my Ford Ranger....hard or easy.......town or freeway....it gets 17-18 mpg and never changes.

  7. #22
    MattC is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    24

    Talking

     



    Quote Originally Posted by 69elko
    Probably didn't have enough torque to pull anything of that day. Every car was a boat in the 80's. Would of been great in a CRX.
    I have a Pontiac Bonneville ad from 1978 that compares the 231 V6 powered Bonnie against the Audi 5000 of all cars, with Pontiac talking up the fact their car was 1,000s cheaper and was rated 1 mpg (EPA) higher, 18 versus 17 mpg. It was cheaper and thriftier than the import, technically, so the advert is true, but a Bonneville & Audi 5000 was a bizarre comparison, what were the GM ad men thinking...or smoking?

  8. #23
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by MattC
    I have a Pontiac Bonneville ad from 1978 that compares the 231 V6 powered Bonnie against the Audi 5000 of all cars, with Pontiac talking up the fact their car was 1,000s cheaper and was rated 1 mpg (EPA) higher, 18 versus 17 mpg. It was cheaper and thriftier than the import, technically, so the advert is true, but a Bonneville & Audi 5000 was a bizarre comparison, what were the GM ad men thinking...or smoking?
    Yes,that was a bit of a stretch.

  9. #24
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    Quote Originally Posted by halftanked
    A big boat like an old Cadillac sedan with a 472 can give 20-22 mpg when driven modestly. Hank
    then why does my de smogged 80 chevy pick up with a 350 only get 6-8 mpg?!!!

  10. #25
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    Quote Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
    then why does my de smogged 80 chevy pick up with a 350 only get 6-8 mpg?!!!
    .......because it has the aerodynamics of a barn door, a tailgate that acts like a NA$CAR spoiler and a 5.88 set of rear gears maybe??

    Heck, my V10 F350 only does 10-12 around town And it must have every smog control device known to man on it!!
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  11. #26
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    I'm considering building a car with a motorcycle engine and lots of lightweight stuff like a tube frame, etc. With gas getting nuts it would be cool to have a little driver that got really good gas milage. I know squat about motorcycles though, so if and when I decide to do it I'll need some input from the bikers among us to help pick one with the right cc's and all to use as a donor.

    I'd just buy a moped, but with some of the drivers we have down here I at least want SOME protection around me.

    Don

  12. #27
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    Quote Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
    I'm considering building a car with a motorcycle engine and lots of lightweight stuff like a tube frame, etc. ......................
    Don
    Why not a little ricer 4 cyl engine - some of them will do even better then many bike motors
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  13. #28
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    Quote Originally Posted by IC2
    Why not a little ricer 4 cyl engine - some of them will do even better then many bike motors
    Good thought. I just assumed mc engines like the 750 cc ones would get fantastic milage. But you may have a good point, and the ricers run forever and are cheap. especially wrecked ones.

    Don

  14. #29
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,869

    Quote Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
    I'm considering building a car with a motorcycle engine and lots of lightweight stuff like a tube frame, etc. With gas getting nuts it would be cool to have a little driver that got really good gas milage. I know squat about motorcycles though, so if and when I decide to do it I'll need some input from the bikers among us to help pick one with the right cc's and all to use as a donor.

    I'd just buy a moped, but with some of the drivers we have down here I at least want SOME protection around me.

    Don
    A number of years ago there was an outfit in, I think, Reno NV that made a T bucket kit that took any one of a variety of 4 cyl motorcycle engines. It was roughly a 3/4 maybe 7/8 scale car. I suspect market demand didn't support their long term existence. It's all about hp and weight in this context so I don't know that the motorcycle engine would have any particular advantage if there were a comparable small car engine (Aveo, Fit, and so on).
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  15. #30
    Twitch's Avatar
    Twitch is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    L.A.
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 Z-28
    Posts
    246

    Last year my 96 Eldorado Touring Coupe w/300HP and 104,000 miles on it ran a section of hiway at 70MPH for 300 miles and hit 28.8 MPG. For another 165 miles I wound up to 80 and 85 when possible and it averaged 26.8. Why the hell would I want some squeeky jap car?
    There is no substitute for cubic inches

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink