-
01-17-2008 04:08 PM #1
State Troopers busted in Houston,Tx
The local news has memos sent out by Supervisors that troopers were to increase DWI arrest or face punishment, up to 4 a week...... What a freaking joke!
Man I cant even imagine this sort of thing going on.Last edited by BigTruckDriver; 01-17-2008 at 04:34 PM.
Friends dont let friends drive fords!
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-17-2008 06:06 PM #2
I don't see the problem with it.
The drunks are out there driving, the cops should be busting them..
Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
EG
-
01-17-2008 06:28 PM #3
There is a real problem there. It should be every drunk they can find. Drunks are just as bad as teenagers driving with cell phones. Maybe even as bad as adults with cells.theres no foo like an old foo
-
01-17-2008 06:48 PM #4
A few years back, there was a city that had 1/3 of their force off, for on duty injuries. The local County Sheriff was contracted to fill in. One Sheriff traffic car arrested more DUIs in 1 month than their force did all year. After that, the city thought about disbanding their local police force and contracting with the Sheriffs. However, the Sheriff refused to absorb the personnel that was off, so it fell through.
-
01-17-2008 07:21 PM #5
A few years ago Tennessee had a campaign going that said if you are caught drunk driving, you will automatically get 11-29 (11 months, 29 days in jail). Had a 26 year old guy working for us in the welding shop I managed. Got a call one morning that he got busted drunk driving...I thought "good, its his 5TH" !!!
Guess what he got for his 5th DUI in 4 years while driving on a suspended license (for the 4 OTHER offenses)... 5 weekends! Every friday at 3 pm he left work and reported to the county jail. Monday morning at midnight, he was released to go home. The laws only seem to punish the "good" people that make a mistake anymore. Makes NO sense...If its not worth doing right, its not worth doing... Donny, MaxxMuscle Custom Painting
-
01-17-2008 10:02 PM #6
I think you guys are missing the point ,or maybe I am, but the way I took it from the way it was reported it was bad. First off the cops should be looking for drunk drivers 100 percent of their time! If they have not been finding many and are know forced,pushed, and have it in their best interest to come up with drunk drivers for their job. Now they are forced to come up with drunk drivers by all means.....
Dont know, drunk drivers are bad news ,I agree that 100%. Just seems kind of sh*ty they way there going about. Theres a right way and a wrong way of going about things and this just doesn't seems right.....Friends dont let friends drive fords!
-
01-17-2008 10:09 PM #7
Originally Posted by BigTruckDriverYesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
01-18-2008 04:52 AM #8
it frightens me very much to know how many times i have been out in one of my toys so drunk i dont remember how i got home .. finally a trooper caught me about a year ago and scared me straight .. much more drunk and fast driving enforcement must be done .. citizens with cell phones need to help by reporting eratic driving of any kind .. .. just dont bother the hot rodders ... thats a dif breed of driver ..
-
01-18-2008 06:28 AM #9
BigTruck, I am in agreement with you, the point seems to be that they were either letting them go, or not stopping them at all. I will pick up the cell and report someone driving eratticly if I see it. My point was just to show that even if they are picked up, it doesn't mean they won't just get a slap on the wrist and be right back at it...If its not worth doing right, its not worth doing... Donny, MaxxMuscle Custom Painting
-
01-18-2008 08:19 AM #10
Each county handles DUI's different, depending upon jail space. Even countries are different. In Japan, if you have alcohol on your breath, it's one year in jail, regardless of the amount. In El Salvador, there is only one conviction for DUI because the punishment is death by firing squad.
I know cops that have never made a DUI arrest. I asked them why, they said it was because it was 3X the paperwork and they never bothered to learn/be comfortable with the intoxilizer. Sounded kinda lazy to me. My brother just became Chief of Police at a local city. Hes already fired 3 cops for laziness and its been less than a year.
-
01-18-2008 09:58 AM #11
It'll mean that troopers will hang out near places that serve liquor and watch as patrons exit. They do this to some degree anyhow. To increse any arrest numbers law enforcement has to go to where the problem is. It won't mean that while sitting there a priority call that comes will be ignored.
The example Max related is the real problem. Multiple arrests, licences revoked decades ago and they're still doin' it.
There is no substitute for cubic inches
-
01-18-2008 11:53 AM #12
Ill give ya my twisted take on it ,if I cant drink and drive as in ,1 or 2 beers ,then all the bars and restaraunts should not be able to sell liquor peroid.........I come from a place in the mid west where drinking and driving were legal until not too many years ago.
Of course you can not be drunk ,only drinking as in a beer or 2..........I think the problem came when they changed the laws to driving under the influence ,instead of DWI or driving while intoxicated,now with the new laws you can enjoy the same punishment for having one beer as the guy who drank a 1/5 of jack and was driving on the wrong side of the freeway...sound fair to you.....
I can see why the officers do not arrest every single preacher and school teacher they pull over after going to TGI fridays for lunch and having a mixed drink or a glass of wine or a beer.
These officers are our last defence against a force of fools who want all of us inside the big house for having a beer..................
Its almost involuntary entrapment if you ask me .......heres a place you can only drive to ,to drink ,but you cant drive after you drink.....
Just let me make clear I do not condone drunken driving ,I am only saying a beer at lunch or after work is not a felony crime ,punishable by imprisonment.
Now on a personal note ,liquor is the worst thing to have been legalized,it completely alters a persons actions to the point of little memory of what happend the night before ..... gee thanks government.....
I on the other hand live in beatiful cali ...home of the medicinal erbs ,I can have 6 ounces of lettuce on me at one time and smoke where I like with the medical card,I have never seen or heard of a person smokin enuff that they could not function in a normal manner,we are well on our way to legalization out here.
A much better alternative to alchaholism and all the medical complications that come from drinking.
None of it is any good ,but the towns people must do sumtin to release or they get the pitch forks and shovels out and start to drive the people in charge out of town,or worse yet.......they turn on each other ,just look back into real histories pages ,not the alice in wonderland garbage you learn in school ,but real actual events in history ,without the perceptual twist being put on it.
All the drug stuff ,including liquor just keeps the town folk quiet,when they aint got ,mothers little helpers, they just go luny and nuts .
Could you even imagine if America was off all drugs ,like caffiene ,nicotine ,liquor ,pot ..etc... It would be like escape from newyork 24 hours a day......Last edited by shawnlee28; 01-18-2008 at 12:07 PM.
Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
01-18-2008 12:24 PM #13
Maybe they weren't getting so many DWI's in the first place cause they just did not want to go through the paper work, which is wrong, dont know. Now that there job is on the line there going to find them by all means. Just doesnt sit well with me , now they are forced to get them some drunk drivers. They are state troopers a big % of arrest would be DUI's on the highways, i would think.
I guess my complaint is,Whats next??????
I never get drunk and drive and it pisses me off to see others do it.Last edited by BigTruckDriver; 01-18-2008 at 02:41 PM.
Friends dont let friends drive fords!
-
01-18-2008 12:40 PM #14
Originally Posted by BigTruckDriver
Drunk driving is wrong.... Nothing can be said to justify it. Looks to me like it is nothing more then an emphasis being put on it... Why does the reason matter if it gets more drunk drivers off the road....and makes many, many others stop driving while under the influence....
Guess I can't understand why you would be against anything designed to make the roads a safer place!!! Hard enough dodging the sober ones who are "impaired" by cell phone use, screaming kids, or whatever else they choose as a form of distraction. The drunks are almost impossible to avoid!!!!!Last edited by Dave Severson; 01-18-2008 at 12:44 PM.
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
01-18-2008 12:45 PM #15
Originally Posted by shawnlee28Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
A "skip" = a dumpster.... but he says it's proper english??? Oh.. Okay. Most of us can see the dating site pun, "matching" with an arsonist.. But a "SKIP? How is that a box? It must all be...
the Official CHR joke page duel