Thread: This Is Not A CraigsList Notice

Tweet

Originally Posted by 1gary

There is one other thing to consider about Obama. He showed great courage, that most Presidents haven't had, at high aleast political risk,sending in the Seal Team like he did. Why??. He was representing all the American people.

Yet now,he is showing great restraint with the recent killing,not to get us snarled into another war. That defines leadership.

One of the first things this dunderhead did when he took office was to remove the American flag from the tail of Air Force 1. That's all I need to know about him. Remember the early days of his press conferences? Not one American flag behind him, only some stupid "change" flags. Remember his refusal to wear an American flag pin on his lapel like everyone else? I think we're seeing him more frequently in rolled-up shirt sleeves so that he doesn't have to wear that pin. He looks to me more like a lower-management guy than the President of the United States.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't want some non-American in the Oval Office. This man hates America. His frumpy wife hates America. He is not my president. She is not my first lady. These people are all about CHANGING AMERICA. I don't think America needs changing. The founding fathers set it up to work for everyone, but these guys want to take us back to unarmed serfdom. You guys who haven't read the Obamacare legislation really should take the time to educate yourselves. The disarming of American citizens is in there. Is that what you want? You want to be standin' there with nothing in your hand when the troops bust down your front door to search your home? Well, just keep votin' for those Democrats and that's where it's headed. Big money wants you to be a fully-controlled serf with no rights and no way to fight back. All of these candidates have to take the "One World Government" pledge or they wouldn't get the backing and support to become elected.

This guy makes Harry Truman look like a Republican.

I am of the opinion that neither of them should be President. What would be best for the Republic would be the election of all new and fresh patriot independents in the Oval Office and in Congress. Anything this side of that scenario will be unacceptable to me.

his goal has been to disarm us from day one. tech , i agree with you 100% . but at the moment getting rid of obama is job one. i would vote for george wallace over obama. anyone , i voted mcain in 08. i would vote for anything other than obama and take my chances.

Originally Posted by techinspector1

One of the first things this dunderhead did when he took office was to remove the American flag from the tail of Air Force 1. That's all I need to know about him. Remember the early days of his press conferences? Not one American flag behind him, only some stupid "change" flags.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't want some non-American in the Oval Office. This man hates America. His frumpy wife hates America. He is not my president. She is not my first lady. These people are all about CHANGING AMERICA. I don't think America needs changing. The founding fathers set it up to work for everyone, but these guys want to take us back to unarmed serfdom. You guys who haven't read the Obamacare legislation really should take the time to educate yourselves. The disarming of American citizens is in there. Is that what you want? You want to be standin' there with nothing in your hand when the troops bust down your front door to search your home? Well, just keep votin' for those Democrats and that's where it's headed. Big money wants you to be a fully-controlled serf with no rights and no way to fight back. All of these candidates have to take the "One World Government" pledge or they wouldn't get the backing and support to become elected.

This guy makes Harry Truman look like a Republican.

I am of the opinion that neither of them should be President. What would be best for the Republic would be the election of all new and fresh patriot independents in the Oval Office and in Congress. Anything this side of that scenario will be unacceptable to me.

To take away a private citizen's legal weapon against our military really wouldn't matter all that much with all due respect Richard. And certainly that isn't what I would want to see either. The right to bear arms our for fathers wrote about was during a time when it did matter.
The last paragraph you wrote,I'm with you 150%. The time has long past when we need people who have a interest in the country and it's people first.

Originally Posted by 1gary

To take away a private citizen's legal weapon against our military really wouldn't matter all that much with all due respect Richard.

Against our military???? This isn't about being armed against our military. It's about being armed against the tyranny and oppression of an out-of-control government that is controlled by big money. It's about resisting being reduced to an unarmed serf who is forced to hunker down to an armed master. During WWII, the Japanese decided against an invasion of mainland U.S. They envisioned "a gun behind every tree" and that's the way it has to be for a people to be free.

Originally Posted by 1gary

The right to bear arms our for fathers wrote about was during a time when it did matter.

Gary, I'm almost speechless. I'm shocked for sure at this statement. Are you of the opinion that it doesn't matter today???? If that's the case, then there is little hope for you and others who think like you. Freedom requires constant vigil by concerned citizens who view themselves as patriots. It isn't free today any more than it was 200 years ago.