Thread: 9 inch ford in a model a frame
-
09-13-2013 10:44 AM #16
Who makes a triangular rear kit for an "a" frame with an added "x" member kit? Will a '32 kit be sufficiant?
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
09-13-2013 10:50 AM #17
Ken Thomas
NoT FaDe AwaY and the music didn't die
The simplest road is usually the last one sought
Wild Willie & AA/FA's The greatest show in drag racing
-
09-13-2013 11:04 AM #18
Pete & Jakes is one - Pete and Jake's Hot Rod Parts
Speedway Motors is another - Triangulated 4-Bar Rear Supsension Assembly Kit for Model A Frame - Speedway Motors, America's Oldest Speed Shop
Summit lists a bunch of universals - http://www.summitracing.com/search?k...rder=Ascending
Are you running fenders on this '26 Coupe?Roger
Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.
-
09-13-2013 11:22 AM #19
Checked speedway, but all i see are the '32 kits and the '33 '34 kits. Maybe their online catalog offers an "a" kit. I've got the rear fenders loosely bolted on and they look pretty good. Considering running the original splash aprons with modified\reshaped running boards. The chrysler 392 is already bolted to a g.m. Bellhousing via an adaptor plate,and the richmond t-10 is attached. At the moment, there is no radiator on the frame , but the engine\trans are in for mock up purposes. THANKS TO EVERYONE FOR THEIR 2 CENTS !Last edited by SUPERDELUXE; 09-13-2013 at 11:30 AM.
-
09-13-2013 11:35 AM #20
Roger
Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.
-
09-13-2013 12:23 PM #21
The speedway kit is for "their" model a frame with '32 rails and a tubular "x" member. I'm using henry's frame and a dagel's c-channel type "x" member. Summitt's chassis engineering ladder bar kit looks interesting. I will definatly do some photoshopping and schetches of the car with stretched fender aprons and running boards before i make a hasty decision. I have two sets of aprons and running boards if i go this route. I'm leaning towards the ford spare tire cover front fender idea. I've got a few of them laying around. I like hot rods in all flavors and say "to each his own" but i don't want to build a cookie cutter car.
-
09-13-2013 12:37 PM #22
Buggy springs front and rear are not exactly known to produce a good handling, nice riding car.....Raising the ride height will also raise the center of gravity on the car and adversely effect the roll center and instant center which will only compound the inherent poor handling of solid axles and buggy springs. Not wanting to build a cookie cutter car is fine, I'm guilty of the same thing.....Remember though that their are a lot of engineering opportunities to deal with in order to have a car that will go comfortably and safely down the road......Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
A "skip" = a dumpster.... but he says it's proper english??? Oh.. Okay. Most of us can see the dating site pun, "matching" with an arsonist.. But a "SKIP? How is that a box? It must all be...
the Official CHR joke page duel