Thread: Office of the President of the USA

Tweet

Evolvo, you mentioned Trump's trip to Mar-a-Logo averaged 'X' amount of taxpayer dollars. Regardless of where a President goes, its going to cost tax payer dollars. Nonetheless, here's the beauty of it, Trump owns Mar-a-Logo so at least the taxpayer's not paying for hotel expenses........Trump's given millions of his dollars to charities and good causes....hard pressed to name a recent Pres who's done that. The man paid for his own campaign, does not draw a Presidential salary, etc. Again......how many President's out there have done this? So when you talk about expenses, you're not exactly comparing apples to apples. And how do the so called 'un-wealthy' Presidents or politicians come out of the office being wealthy or suddenly having vast amounts of more money? How indeed sir. Obviously Trump did not have to take public office for the money or prestige or anything other than he cares about our Country.. JMHO here,

Time for Mr. Bill......
Sad we devolved even further here. With respect, this is exactly why we are a nation divided. One thought process without trying to respect or understand the other side, leads to no respect. Tip Oneil used to say we fight all day on the hill, but at 5pm we go to the same bar, have drinks and compromise....smart man!

Oh boy ,oh boy, Grab a seat everyone, here we go again!

the problem with the lefts gun control is they dont want it. they had the power do do it all but did nothing. i know of no one opposed to background checks. when my bride bought her pistol at the gun show it took about 15 min to clear her. if they would allow private sellers access to the data they could do it also. and they would prefer to do it. i sure as hell dont want to sell a gun to some one else that would come back on me . same with a car . i'm for doing the bak ground check bill and put an end to this . this will force the left to tell the truth. they want confiscation period. no one needs a full auto and the only people who own them are highly regulated collectors or dealers.

I once had a full automatic single shot 22------------one pull of the trigger untill gun empty would either kill that damn rabbit or we'd go hungry a little longer

I agree no one "needs" full auto. But I'd sure like to have one of those modified .22s with the round barrel mag that shoots like a buzz saw. Bye bye squirrels. Feeding the darn thing would be the expensive part. Haha

ever hear of barking squirrels ?

Originally Posted by shine

ever hear of barking squirrels ?

No, but I've heard barking spiders, following a generous bowl of bean soup.
.

Well I'm thinking about buying a full auto before the feds step in and make them impossible to get. I'm looking real hard at this one....

We have some bodacious Nerf battles with the adult boys and grand kids. This one looks like a real serious contender to me.

Keepin' it light

For those who forgot to read THIS POST I respectfully suggest that you do so before posting on this thread again.

this is the lounge .carry on .

Boys, you are taking my post incorrectly, you do know the post I linked above has been posted at the top of this very forum since 01-29-2006 right

As for this particular sub forum, indeed, but even this publicly read/accessible (to all ages) section has limitations.

Whats the problem-I started it as a patriotic thing about the Office of the President----not political, religous or numerous other objectionable themes------since then we have had NFL???, now a shooting by someone( or several) people that are evil and some discussion about rifles and hunting ??????

i think things will be fine . civil discussion never leads to trouble. i think the problem is gone now .

Originally Posted by shine

i think things will be fine .

Yes

Originally Posted by shine

civil discussion never leads to trouble.

Yes

Originally Posted by shine

i think the problem is gone now .

Yes