Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 305 in a bucket?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 74
  1. #1
    S19243H's Avatar
    S19243H is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    pottstown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 t bucket
    Posts
    347

    305 in a bucket?

     



    what do you guys think? i know im going to open a can of worms with this question ...lets see what happens.
    i have a 83 305 ho out of my old z28 it has 68000 original miles if i was to put new rings and bearings change to a flat top piston a torker cam and tunnel ram with two 390s in a 1600 lb car how you guys think it will run .
    GLENN
    you can do it if you know how it works

  2. #2
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by S19243H
    what do you guys think? i know im going to open a can of worms with this question ...lets see what happens.
    i have a 83 305 ho out of my old z28 it has 68000 original miles if i was to put new rings and bearings change to a flat top piston a torker cam and tunnel ram with two 390s in a 1600 lb car how you guys think it will run .
    Sure,why not.
    I have seen a few of them over the years.

  3. #3
    brianrupnow's Avatar
    brianrupnow is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Barrie-Ontario-Canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1931 Roadster Pickup
    Posts
    2,016

    As has been said before "you can't polish a turd"!!! No matter what you do to it, its still going to be a weak assed, wimpy 305. If your going to spend the money, start with a 350.
    Old guy hot rodder

  4. #4
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by brianrupnow
    As has been said before "you can't polish a turd"!!! No matter what you do to it, its still going to be a weak assed, wimpy 305. If your going to spend the money, start with a 350.
    I have an idea.
    If you already have a 305 why not put a 3.75 crank in it.HMMM

  5. #5
    nitrowarrior's Avatar
    nitrowarrior is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mesa
    Posts
    1,385

    HHmmm is right. 329 cubes with std bore. Squares the bore to stroke ratio. Right rod combo and a decent pair of heads, cam it right, should be a little torquer.
    What if the "Hokey Pokey" is what it's really all about?

  6. #6
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    I'm going to go on the other side of the fence on this one. I think a 305 would be fine for it as long as you were just out to build a dependable, moderately snappy performing T. Not all of us want or need a scorcher, and I am truly unable to use all the HP mine puts out, and it is just a moderate 350. If I get into it too deep it wants to go sideways, so I would be very happy to have something like a 305 up there.

    I understand that if someone is trying to go for as much bang for the buck as possible, it makes sense to start with as many cubes as possible, but look at all of the cars running flatheads and even 6 cylinder engines and the owners get a lot of enjoyment out of driving them. Even the cars running 4 cylinders, like the track T JRobinson is building, are a blast to run around in and perform great in traffic.

    So my vote says use it. You can't tell a 283 from a 350 unless you are really up on the slight differences, so a sbc is a sbc. Dress it up and have fun.

    Don

  7. #7
    mopar34's Avatar
    mopar34 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Stewartstown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ply PE sdn; 57 Olds 88 J2
    Posts
    1,953

    I agree with Don on this one. The 305 would make a nice little cruiser and if you are going to put it in a light weight car like a T it should have more than enough power for some red light challenges (just don't bet the farm on it) . After all you don't really need a double plug blown hemi to push a T or an A down the road. Unless you want to.
    Bob

    A good friend will come and bail you out of jail....but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying..."Damn....that was fun!

  8. #8
    canadianal's Avatar
    canadianal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    waldeck
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 ford custom,27 t bucket
    Posts
    683

    build it light enough any anything will go fast

  9. #9
    S19243H's Avatar
    S19243H is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    pottstown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 t bucket
    Posts
    347

    thanks guys, this is my first T and from what ive been told from other T owners [ you dont need that much power for it to scare the poop out of ya],im gone to stick with the plan and stay with the 305[it might keep me from getting killed]1600 lbs with motor and trans,yea thats lite.will it[305] handle two carbs with progressive linkage, for cruisin to meets?
    GLENN
    you can do it if you know how it works

  10. #10
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    Two fours will obviously not be as good as a single four barrel, but we all overcarb our rods for the cool factor. If you play with jets you should get it to be very reasonable performance wise. As for performance, honestly it is hard to use much in a light, short wb t bucket. I got my foot deep in mine coming out of a rest stop to merge with traffic on I 4, and the upshift to 2nd lit em up and scared me a little. In normal driving you won't even get into the secondaries.

    I like the idea that you have and know the history of the engine too, that helps a lot. Keep us posted.

    Don

  11. #11
    S19243H's Avatar
    S19243H is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    pottstown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 t bucket
    Posts
    347

    thanks guys
    GLENN
    you can do it if you know how it works

  12. #12
    TooMany2count's Avatar
    TooMany2count is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cahokia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Chevy 1ton Bus
    Posts
    2,498
    Donate Blood,Plasma,Platelets & sign your DONORS CARD & SAVE a LIFE

    Two possibilities exist:
    Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not.
    Both are equally terrifying.
    Arthur C. Clarke

  13. #13
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    at 1600 pounds with street tires, especially the usual exaggerated big and little tire combination on T-buckets the LAST thing you want is a whole ton of horsepower.... For 1600 pounds the engine you describe IMO would be very practical and very driveable....

    Here's some interesting numbers to ponder...... According to my Virtual Engine calculator, a 275 horsepower engine in a 1600 pound car with the right gears, tires, and suspension should run 11.01 @ 122 in the quarter.....The same horsepower (275) in the usual 3600 pound street car will go 14.43 @ 93 in the quarter....A lightweight car is still the cheapest way to build performance!!!!!!!
    Last edited by Dave Severson; 11-29-2007 at 08:23 PM.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  14. #14
    Gastrick's Avatar
    Gastrick is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pompano Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: Anglia Ute, 32 Ford 3W Coupe
    Posts
    152

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    I have an idea.
    If you already have a 305 why not put a 3.75 crank in it.HMMM
    I actually did this before. I used a 400 crank in a 305 with an 030 over bore and made a 334. It was a good running engine. Speed-O-Motive used to sell a rotating assembly for this swap. I did it because of the emision inspection that we had here at that time. They always pulled me aside and checked everthing on my vehicle because it was a tubbed pro-streeter.
    Last edited by Gastrick; 11-29-2007 at 10:17 PM.
    I may not be good but I sure am slow

  15. #15
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    well they do make stroker kits for them, and althought people down play it as a performance motor, IMHO its one of the most dependable v8's chevy ever had, i had a stock 305 in a malibu wagon and we stuck a weiand 142 mini blower on it very well mannered and fun,!

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink