Thread: The Roofus Special

Tweet

OK, guys, here are the pics I have. I took the photo and did the drawing about 20 years ago for a catalog I was helping to edit. The company went out of business a long time ago, but I still have the pics & drawings I did. I edited out the company's name and phone info...

Notice the long center "torque arm" is supposed to reach all the way to the rear u-joint area (transmission crossmember) and has a shackle type mount that is made from a female Heim joint mounted in rubber. The short arms are considerably shorter, but could be any length you desire. As I stated above, the longer they are, the less rear-steer they induce. When viewed from the side, if the short bars run uphill from the rear axle to the frame they will induce positive steer and make the rear of the vehicle "loose" in a turn (good for running on dirt tracks). If they run downhill from the rear axle to the frame, they will induce negative steer and make the rear of the vehicle "tight" in a corner (better for asphalt).

That's interesting. I just saw this 1st Gen Camaro torque arm setup in the new Hot Rod.


BMR Fabrication

Very cool J., thanks a lot.

Originally Posted by 39Deluxe

That's interesting. I just saw this 1st Gen Camaro torque arm setup in the new Hot Rod.


BMR Fabrication

That's a really cool bolt-in conversion. It uses a telescoping joint at the front instead of a shackle arrangement. Notice it has multiple holes in the bracket for the short arms so that rear-steer input can be fine-tuned. Nice!

Originally Posted by J. Robinson

That's a really cool bolt-in conversion. It uses a telescoping joint at the front instead of a shackle arrangement. Notice it has multiple holes in the bracket for the short arms so that rear-steer input can be fine-tuned. Nice!

That one has all three links mounting at roughly floorpan level.

Is that ideal? or a comprimise for a stock floor Camaro? Is it better if you went above the driveshaft with the front mount?

I'm not sure, Flipper... Very good question. I would guess that it's a compromise for the stock floor and mounting hardware. If you look under a 3rd generation Camaro, the long arm runs beside the driveshaft, not under it. I'm not sure it would make a huge difference, though, unless you moved the front pivot point up and back a lot which would affect weight transfer under acceleration/deceleration.

When you move the instant center up and back, it improves traction for launch/acceleration (suspension loads), but, if ya go too far, can cause wheel-hop on deceleration (suspension unloads). I think I would follow the Camaro's example and mount the center link beside the front u-joint.

Note also, on a 3rd gen Camaro at stock height, the short arms run slightly downhill from the rear axle to the subframe mounting points. That gives the stock Camaro a slight negative input from the rear-steer. I've never talked to any GM designers, but I would guess they designed it that way because the 3rd gen Camaros are slightly nose heavy and need the negatve input to control oversteer (loose condition). For your application, I think I would keep the short arms as level as possible and lengthen them to about 2/3rd the length of the long arm. That way the rear-steer input would be minimal and controllable. My reasoning here is that your car is a lot lighter than a stock Camaro and your weight distribution will be about 50-50; you therefore don't need a lot of rear-steer input under normal driving conditions. If you can somehow incorporate it into your design, it would be nice to have multiple mounting holes so that you could adjust the angle of the short arms. That way, if you ever want to run it through a Gymkhana or flog in on a dirt track at one of the vintage meets, you could dial in the rear suspension to your liking.

How about multiple mounting holes for the torque arm also?

There is no reason you couldn't have multiple mounting holes for the torque arm. If you raise or lower the front of the torque arm, though, you would have to adjust the rear heims to maintain pinion angle. If you are suggesting holes to move the pivot fore or aft, the arm would have to be made adjustable lengthwise...

No, up and down on the torque arm with LH/RH threaded heims on the rear bars. Maybe LH in the front heim and RH in the rear heim. Weld a nut on the bar itself to fit a wrench to turn the bar after loosening the heim lock nuts.

Originally Posted by techinspector1

No, up and down on the torque arm with LH/RH threaded heims on the rear bars. Maybe LH in the front heim and RH in the rear heim. Weld a nut on the bar itself to fit a wrench to turn the bar after loosening the heim lock nuts.

That torque arm "bar" is a piece of 2x3 tubing that is secuerly attached to the rear end in at least 4 places. I don't think it would easily adjust.

Jim I'm enjoying the build keep them coming!

Originally Posted by Flipper_1938

That torque arm "bar" is a piece of 2x3 tubing that is secuerly attached to the rear end in at least 4 places. I don't think it would easily adjust.

Referring to post 51. The torque arm is attached at the housing with what looks like heims, so you could raise or lower the torque arm at the front of the arm and adjust the heims in or out to keep the housing at the point you want it for correct pinion angle. The two outboard bars also have heims at each end. Those are the ones I was referring to with the LH and RH heims. If you have a RH heim on one end of the bar and a LH heim on the other end of the bar with a large nut drilled out and slipped onto the bar and welded to the bar, you could just loosen the heim jam nuts and turn the welded-on nut to lengthen or shorten the outer bars.

If I'm looking at this wrong, tell me and I'll shut up.

Originally Posted by techinspector1

Referring to post 51. The torque arm is attached at the housing with what looks like heims, so you could raise or lower the torque arm at the front of the arm and adjust the heims in or out to keep the housing at the point you want it for correct pinion angle. The two outboard bars also have heims at each end. Those are the ones I was referring to with the LH and RH heims. If you have a RH heim on one end of the bar and a LH heim on the other end of the bar with a large nut drilled out and slipped onto the bar and welded to the bar, you could just loosen the heim jam nuts and turn the welded-on nut to lengthen or shorten the outer bars.

If I'm looking at this wrong, tell me and I'll shut up.

Sorry, I was referring to the one posted in #53. It is built like a tank.

You don't have to use Photobucket unless you just want to. All you have to do is click on the button "Go Advanced". Scroll down to "Manage Attachments" and load your pics directly to this site & thread. It helps a lot if you resize your pics first to 640 x 480.

I've been thinking about what I am going to do to it this weekend....

I think I made it too big. I may narrow and shorten the cowl. It looks really big in some of those pics.

I think I am also going to play with the size of the passenger compartment opening. I think the dash may need to come back...or move the seat up just a little.

Oh, and I think I am going three link on the rear suspension.