-
08-07-2014 03:06 PM #226
Interior came out great, car looks SUPER!!!!!Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
08-07-2014 03:45 PM #227
Them FAT front tires ain't helpin anyWhen I get to where I was goin, I forgot why I went there>
-
08-07-2014 04:40 PM #228
Wow! Calling it done! I don't think I have ever owned a car that I called really done. Congratulations.
-
08-07-2014 05:12 PM #229
johnboy
Mountain man. (Retired.)
Some mistakes are too much fun to be made only once.
I don't know everything about anything, and I don't know anything about lots of things.
'47 Ford sedan. 350 -- 350, Jaguar irs + ifs.
'49 Morris Minor. Datsun 1500cc, 5sp manual, Marina front axle, Nissan rear axle.
'51 Ford school bus. Chev 400 ci Vortec 5 sp manual + Gearvendors 2sp, 2000 Chev lwb dually chassis and axles.
'64 A.C. Cobra replica. Ford 429, C6 auto, Torana ifs, Jaguar irs.
-
08-07-2014 06:24 PM #230
I no longer have a minimum toe in or a minimum caster. I increased them both a bit and it helped a lot. I'm not worried about the relatively small negative camber. The Vega box is tuned and Pitman arm is straight ahead and dead center.
I'm considering a narrower tire. That would shrink the tire patch quite a bit, but it wouldn't change the distance from the intersection of the kingpin axis at the ground to the center of the tire.
Maybe I'm not quite done . . .Jack
Gone to Texas
-
08-07-2014 07:02 PM #231
those wide wheel/tires and that king pin angle transfer a lot of weight as one wheel will be pushed down and the opposite raised as you turn them. Any alignment shop that does trucks can tweeque the axle to get rid of the negative camber. You also can keep adding castor until it gets hard to turn the wheel (Manual steering?)
-
08-07-2014 07:40 PM #232
Jerry, It is manual steering, but it's not really hard to turn. I can't get much more caster without the tie rod rubbing on the bottom rod of the hairpin. I might get another degree or so.
One thing I have not checked is the weight distribution at all four corners because I don't have the scales.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
08-11-2014 04:26 PM #233
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Prairie City
- Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
- Posts
- 7,297
- Blog Entries
- 1
Congrats on getting it to this point! Now to start to be able to enjoy it. I miss that about mine for sure.Ryan
1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
Tire Sizes
-
08-14-2014 03:29 PM #234
I changed out the front tires today to Firestone (Coker) F560 165/R15. THey have a tread width of 4.8" compared to the 7.5" wide tires I had before. They also gave me a bit more rake. The steering is much better, but not perfect.
I have coil-overs front and rear, so I'm trying to find a place with scales so I can check the weight on all four corners. I have them adjusted to the same length, but that doesn't always tell the story.
Footnote on the Coker Firestone clones: I had them balanced on A Hunter Road Force machine, and the tech wasn't sure he could balance them. One tire had 40# of runout. After a couple of remounts, they finally go them balanced. I was surprised when I checked the sidewall. These "Firestones" are made in Ukraine.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
08-14-2014 03:51 PM #235
Leave it to Cory Coker, he'd F&ck up a good thing. Them f560's used to be made in China, but nooooooooo Cory needed to save $3 per tire now he's got JUNK as usual. I've been using 145's, 155's and 165's by Nankang and they usuall balance out with less than 1 1/2 oz of weights.
Smaller tire even looks a lot better Jack.
Remember, yer drivin a Hot Rod not a CaddyWhen I get to where I was goin, I forgot why I went there>
-
08-14-2014 04:32 PM #236
Looking good Jack. I know we have discussed this before but it is a darn shame that by law you have to have the plate on the front of the car. Will you be running side panels to hide your engine ?
I maybe a little crazy but it stops me going insane.
Isaiah 48: 17,18.
Mark.
-
08-14-2014 06:23 PM #237
Thanks, Mark. No I have no plans at the present to include hood sides. A couple of so-called hood sides came with the car, but they were so poorly made that they couldn't be made to fit. My original intent was to have an old-style hot rod with just a hood top and an open engine bay. But then, the infamous "bling monster" bit me, and I kept finding places for chrome and polished aluminum. Other than small things here and there, I don't plan on any major changes.
The plate bugged me also. I tried several different approaches, and couldn't make it work. I'll keep thinking on it, but I had to get it mounted so I could drive it. Anyhow, I figure if we get some snow in the drive, I can plow my way out.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
08-15-2014 06:29 AM #238
A fellow rodder I know ordered BFG P285X70R-15's from Coker as BFG stopped making them. The tire tech could not balance either one of them. Coker made good on it, but this seems to be a problem with their some of their tires. I have those on the back of my '32 but when I change them out over the winter, I will be going to 17 inch rims so I can get a 30 inch tire from Goodyear. Not many 30 inch tire are made for passenger cars anymore--mostly all-terrain tires for trucks and SUV's.
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
09-22-2014 08:06 PM #239
More "driveability" work.
After fighting with the Coker/Ukranian/Firestone crap/clone F560's for a while, I went back to the basics. I pulled the Cokers and gave them to a local Fox body Mustang drag racer and installed a pair of Nankang 165-80/R14's (thanks for the hint, Dan). They balanced out perfectly, down to 3 lbs on the Road Force balancer.
F Quarter.jpg
Next, I built an extension bracket to lower the Panhard bar attachment to the frame. That made a line through the frame and axle attachment points exactly level with the ground. The extension bracket isn't beautiful, but if I ever find myself giving a rat's backside about that, I'll do something about it. Maybe.
F Panhard 1.jpg
F Panhard 2.jpg
Finally, I lowered the rear end of the car so that the rear Panhard bar attachment points are within 1/16" of level with the ground.
Driving test tomorrow.Last edited by Henry Rifle; 09-22-2014 at 08:16 PM.
Jack
Gone to Texas
-
09-23-2014 04:58 AM #240
With the new front tires, panard bar adjustment, it outta be a lot better now JackWhen I get to where I was goin, I forgot why I went there>
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
A "skip" = a dumpster.... but he says it's proper english??? Oh.. Okay. Most of us can see the dating site pun, "matching" with an arsonist.. But a "SKIP? How is that a box? It must all be...
the Official CHR joke page duel