Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By jerry clayton

Thread: Bagger project
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    Bagger project

     



    I'm considering taking on an unfinished S10 bagger project.
    I think they should have created a triangular four link, but they have everything perpendicular. As it sits, it needs a panhard bar.

    I'd like to cut the brackets off, and triangulate the configuration, but I don't know how to set the angles. I don't even remember the down angle for the input shaff of the differential.
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  2. #2
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    ladder bars the length of the driveshaft will keep the u-joints good at the back and a double cardan joint at the front

    Then panhard bar -------
    Last edited by jerry clayton; 07-05-2016 at 09:02 AM.
    Rrumbler likes this.

  3. #3
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    Double cardan you say.

    I'm not familiar with the critter.
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  4. #4
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,717

    Google Constant Velocity Joint..

  5. #5
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    C-V joint. Ok, but why?

    I was kind of fired up about doing the triangular set up, if I take the project. I could have templates the nomad, but it's sold and gone. (It had a factory triangulated four link)
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  6. #6
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    The constant yelocity joint------a u-joint changes shft speed as it rotates, this is what causes driveline vibration when the u joints are at either odd or too much of an angle-
    The cardan constant velocity joints solve/correct that----first ones I saw were on my 1970 Lincoln ------

    every airbag install that I have seen has so much height travel that the short arms (4 link) rotate the rear housing so much that u joint/shaft angles are excessive and you get drive line vibration----

  7. #7
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    I found some specs
    Upper bars angled 35*-45*.
    Upper bars = 70%-80% length of lower
    Lower bar no less than 14". (20"-24")
    @ ride height, lower bars angle up 1/2* and upper bars angle down 6*

    So, questions:
    I seem to recall input shaft angles down 4*?
    Locating arms on rear end: should upper bars stagger relative to location of lower bars? Seems to me that mechanically speaking it would be stronger if top brackets were exactly over bottom brackets.
    Top bars point forward or back?
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink