Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree35Likes

Thread: 71 Camaro engine choice advice
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    40FordDeluxe's Avatar
    40FordDeluxe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Prairie City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
    Posts
    7,297
    Blog Entries
    1

    Just messing with ya. I'm sure you're right about the Nova. It's over priced IMO. No OD trans, deal killer IMO.
    53 Chevy5 likes this.
    Ryan
    1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
    1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
    1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
    1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
    Tire Sizes

  2. #32
    Mike P's Avatar
    Mike P is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SW Arizona
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Ply Valiant, 83 El Camino
    Posts
    3,844

    “……..a non roller cam sbc probably won't happen…….”


    THE SKY IS FALLING……..THE SKY IS FALLING


    As it relates to auto engines, I’ve heard this a few times over the last 50 years. The more notable being the removal of “lead” from Gasoline, the addition of ethanol, and the removal of ZDDPs from oil. The first 2 we learned to adapt to/live with (and honestly the removal of “lead” was not a bad thing considering its adverse effect on the atmosphere).

    As far as removing the ZDDPs from engine oil, I’m not so sure it’s the end of the world either. Although I’m not really sure that I buy all the hype surrounding the real effect of the ZDDPs removal on cams and lifters I don’t discount it either.

    Retrofitting a roller cam to a first Gen SB adds around $1000-1500 to the build. But that’s not necessarily the most cost effective way to go either. All my cars have flat tappet cams in them and a few years ago when the ZDDP started going away, I sat down and ran some numbers about converting some engines to Roller cams. If you think retrofitting a roller cam to a SBC is expensive, price out a kit for a first generation HEMI or 500 Cadillac


    Anyway, if for nothing other than peace of mind the alternative to a roller cam is either a ZDDP additive or specialty oil like Brad Penn. The additive adds about $15 to the cost of an oil change and a Brad Penn oil change is about $40 more expensive.

    Assuming;

    The total cost of a roller cam retrofit is $1500.

    The difference in cost per oil change by using an additive or better oil at either $15 or $40.

    Oil changes at 4000 miles

    At $15 an oil change for additive the car it will take 100 oil changes before the roller cam starts saving you any money. That amounts to 400,000 miles.

    At $40 an oil change for Brad Penn oil it will take 37.5 oil changes before the break even point on changing to a roller cam is reached. That is 150,000 miles.

    Personally I use the additive in all my cars and have not had any cam/lifter related issues to include the cars that I take cross country regularly.

    1st Gen SBC parts are still about the cheapest thing going out there. Then there is the ease of installation which is that it’s a bolt in to include all you current brackets and pulleys, oil pan, mounts etc. No; sensors to add, computer to wire and calibrate, in tank fuel pump and return line to add etc. As more and more cars are converted to the LS motors it will also become the non-belly button car in the crowd

    Then again, you won’t necessarily have the HP numbers, drivability under changing weather and altitude conditions or fuel mileage.

    Seth I’m not trying to point you in any particular direction, just adding to the confusion


    .
    Last edited by Mike P; 08-25-2017 at 07:40 AM.
    NTFDAY, 53 Chevy5 and 40FordDeluxe like this.
    I've NEVER seen a car come from the factory that couldn't be improved.....

  3. #33
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    I do a lot of roller cam conversions for peeps-------best method in the SBC market is to use a one piece seal core block from later years, convert to splayed 4 bolt billet main caps, and stroker crank to the 383-427 cubic inch--I still have a limited supply ( around 40) of the Katec 2 piece billet seal adapters if a person wants 2 piece seal-------

    Dart blocks also very good option especially to go bigger cubes

    I also think that a lot of cam failures comes from tighter rod side clearances, no oil squirter holes to spray cam, too tight of windage tray in oil pan--etc, etc,etc
    Last edited by jerry clayton; 08-25-2017 at 07:36 AM.

  4. #34
    Hotrod46's Avatar
    Hotrod46 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vidalia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1946 Ford Coupe, 1962 Austin Healey 3000
    Posts
    1,504

    Just stir the pot a little more, the Howards SBC retro fit cam and lifters can be had for $625 from Summit. You'll need pushrods and cam button, so call it $750. When you figure in the fact that you will need to buy a flat tappet cam and lifters for a new build anyhow (and pushrods on a good build), the additional cost isn't that bad.

    I used a Howards cam because I had a nice low mileage flat tappet crate engine and didn't want to worry about finding additives or specially blended oils going forward. Can't argue with Mike's numbers other than the initial cost. It's just personal choice really and I like to eliminate the potential problem up front. No different than running ARP rod bolts even though millions of engines run with stock ones.

    You never know what the EPA will come up with next. Could be that they will try to prevent refiners from even offering oils with ZDDP if they suspect that they are finding their way into new vehicles. Probably not going to happen with the current administration, but what about the next? Remember, they regulated it out of most oils because it was poisoning cats and started all this mess in the first place. Just like the ethanol/carb fiasco.

    If I was building a new SBC from scratch, I would just use one of the OEM roller blocks I have stuck back and skip the retro fit stuff. No need for it on a fresh build given the parts choices out there unless you have to have a specific block for a restoration.

    I will say that with all the LS engines being used, it's probably a good time to stock up on used SBC parts if that's the direction you want to go. Most likely some good deals out there if you shop around.
    Mike P, NTFDAY, 53 Chevy5 and 2 others like this.

  5. #35
    53 Chevy5's Avatar
    53 Chevy5 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Doon, Ia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 53 Chevy 3100
    Posts
    2,714

    I think I'm going to stick with the LS1 plan. I got that 5.3 in the 53 and I love not having to screw with anything. I know the LS1 is a belly button engine but after thinking about it 99% of the time, nobody's going to know what I have in it cause it will be going down the road. There may be a car show here and there, and if I have a sbc in it , whats the reward going to be for being a bit different? It will be some guy who looks at it and says " huh, that's neat ", and then move on to the next car. Doing the math of the pros and cons, the LS1 wins in almost every category. I might pick up that Vortec by me just in case though
    techinspector1 and randyr like this.
    Seth

    God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing. C.S.Lewis

  6. #36
    40FordDeluxe's Avatar
    40FordDeluxe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Prairie City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
    Posts
    7,297
    Blog Entries
    1

    One thing about the LS fad is, it will be a long while before it goes away so there will be more and more parts available for them later too. Being different will get expensive but that is worth it too.
    Ryan
    1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
    1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
    1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
    1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
    Tire Sizes

  7. #37
    Hotrod46's Avatar
    Hotrod46 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vidalia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1946 Ford Coupe, 1962 Austin Healey 3000
    Posts
    1,504

    Quote Originally Posted by 40FordDeluxe View Post
    ......so there will be more and more parts available for them later too.
    You're right 40, but you can get pretty good deals on older LS stuff right now.

    I picked up a set of CNC ported cathedral port heads cheap at my local machine shop. They even had titanium retainers and dual valve springs. They had just been serviced when the owner (who is supposed to be a serious street racer)decided to go with LS3 rectangular port heads. They are older heads with the perimeter bolt valve covers and no one wanted them, but they will be head and shoulders better than the stock 243 LS6 heads I was looking for. There's no way I could have ported them anywhere near as good as the CNC mill did.

    I'm shooting for somewhere close to 400HP at the wheels and I don't want to use a lot of cam to do it. I think the heads will help a lot toward that goal. We'll see how it works out. GM was able to get good HP with fairly tame cams in the LS6, so I'm using that as my benchmark.
    53 Chevy5 and 40FordDeluxe like this.

  8. #38
    53 Chevy5's Avatar
    53 Chevy5 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Doon, Ia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 53 Chevy 3100
    Posts
    2,714

    Quote Originally Posted by 40FordDeluxe View Post
    One thing about the LS fad is, it will be a long while before it goes away so there will be more and more parts available for them later too. Being different will get expensive but that is worth it too.
    There's no shortage of LS parts, it a full blown after market paradise with them now. Being different is more expensive and I think I just got a little gun shy with my had to be different experience with the whole 348 thing. The 350 is not anything like a 348 so I should get over that. I talked to the guy with the vortec and It runs fine, it started using a lot of gas and then blew a brake line so he parked it. It has about 160K on it which isn't too bad. My brother has 260K on his and its going just fine. I think I'll grab the Vortec for sure because they don't seem to be as plentiful as the LS motors for the off chance I'll change my mind again. I've always wanted a 383 I think I'll quit posting what my mind is doing hour by hour and stop annoying the the crap out of everybody including myself.
    34_40 likes this.
    Seth

    God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing. C.S.Lewis

  9. #39
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,721

    You're only doing the same thing as all the rest of us! At least twice a day I think I should rip out the 347 and maybe stuff in a Coyote or maybe do another FE? Or maybe...... sigh... We're with ya' brother!!
    53 Chevy5 and 40FordDeluxe like this.

  10. #40
    40FordDeluxe's Avatar
    40FordDeluxe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Prairie City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
    Posts
    7,297
    Blog Entries
    1

    You're not annoying me! Helping spend your money takes my mind off my projects for about 5 seconds.
    Ryan
    1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
    1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
    1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
    1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
    Tire Sizes

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink