Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Home Made Blower?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 59
  1. #31
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  2. #32
    FMXhellraiser's Avatar
    FMXhellraiser is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 Chrysler,49 Ford,66 F100,68 Lincoln
    Posts
    2,835

    Interesting thread that's all I can say. It sucks once you find out that your plan that got your hopes up won't work doesn't it Chevy? I know how it feels, that has been happening to me a TON the past few days.
    www.streamlineautocare.com

    If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!

  3. #33
    kcress's Avatar
    kcress is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    193

    You know I wanted one of these for my Chevy Sub cuz when you get up to about 10,000 feet it pours out black smoke and is probably putting out ...mmm not kidding 40Hp? You can't get it out of first or above about 15MPH..

    This little excursion into this subject has made me finally dig up the numbers and has dashed my plans to put in push button altitude nullification.

    Dream's in ruins....


  4. #34
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    well Chevy, the outlook is bleak to say the least. Maybe you'll want to put that box of blower motors on e-bay

    Thanks to Jack and kcress for pitching in and giving all of us an education.

    Mike, you knew you were right all along, didn't you, you crafty devil !!!

    Thanks to everyone else who responded and/or viewed this thread.
    im sure glade i didnt spend all that money on my blowers for nothing. I hope I learned at least that much messing with them for 20 yrs. and yes I did know you couldnt do that ,but i didnt see a whole lot of people tell me i might be on to something. it was a interesting shread though.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  5. #35
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Originally posted by kcress
    You know I wanted one of these for my Chevy Sub cuz when you get up to about 10,000 feet it pours out black smoke and is probably putting out ...mmm not kidding 40Hp? You can't get it out of first or above about 15MPH..

    This little excursion into this subject has made me finally dig up the numbers and has dashed my plans to put in push button altitude nullification.

    Dream's in ruins....

    about 2500.00 will take care of all your problems.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  6. #36
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Mike, it's interesting to note that you used the word "shread" instead of "thread". Pretty appropriate, I'd say.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  7. #37
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    Mike, it's interesting to note that you used the word "shread" instead of "thread". Pretty appropriate, I'd say.
    a little type-o error there tech. just a few cobwebs left over from the last few weeks i guess.
    Last edited by lt1s10; 04-25-2005 at 08:29 PM.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  8. #38
    kcress's Avatar
    kcress is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    193

    Hey all and Chevy 37

    It's my figuring that the belt driven centrifical blower makes the most sense.

    The streetable blowers I've seen seem kinda problematical. The vanes have to be worn in... (Anything that can wear in can probably ware right on out again)..

    They seem loud, the whir of the vanes, and all.

    Whereas a centrifical has only one? moving part? You could gear it anywhere.

    I will look into it.

    Anybody out there got experience with one?

  9. #39
    MAW
    MAW is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Huntington Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1937 Dodge Pickup, 354 Hemi
    Posts
    137

    * * * As a preface I will state that it's half past midnight and my head may be up my arse. * * *

    The original question posed by Chevy37 was "could a simple mechanism be assembled that would yield modest results?" I'd like to examine this again with that objective in mind.

    The "average" production vehicle operates at a volumetric efficiency (VE) of 0.82-0.88. If the objective would be to improve the VE to "nothing" more than unity (1.0) then no true compression of the air is required, boost in the classical sense is not attempted, and the amount of horsepower required by the blower is substantially less.

    In a perfect world improving the VE of a given engine from a 0.85 to 1.0 would yield a 17.6% gain, or in real numbers your 300HP engine would now be producing 353 HP. This can never be realized due to intake tract restrictions (air cleaner, throttle body, etc.), but there could be room for noticeable improvement on older engines with less efficient intake tracts. I suspect that tuned port motors would show minimal benefits.

    Standing by to be flamed,

    Mark

  10. #40
    kcress's Avatar
    kcress is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    193

    groannnnnnnn............................................................





  11. #41
    kcress's Avatar
    kcress is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    193

    So the question becomes... just what fraction of a PSI is required?

    If it is below about 4inches of water column you might have some vague chance.

    It will come back to a hassle worth doing is worth doing well... that is 6PSI?

    I bet at an idle you could boost reasonably OK but once you get to 100 cfm you must earn that boost.

  12. #42
    kcress's Avatar
    kcress is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    193

    This is were you need a big frikken blower, an engine on a dyno. And a Variable AC Drive to run the blower where ever u want it. Or even a a damper to waste gate and control the boost. And a manometer to track what boost is needed.

  13. #43
    MAW
    MAW is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Huntington Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1937 Dodge Pickup, 354 Hemi
    Posts
    137

    groannnnnnnn............................................................
    I know, I know, should have let it die.

    G'nite, Mark

  14. #44
    mercmad's Avatar
    mercmad is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26 Chev.roadster etc etc
    Posts
    24

    Superchaging two strokes

     



    Supercharging two strokes by using another cylinder or piston is as old as two stroke motors.It's been done lots of times and many racing two strokes of the thirties were set up like that,But if you want to see the ultimate blown 2 stroke,haver a look at diesel locomotive,All the older EMD's ( a GM product) have engines ranging from 1500 HP V8's up to 6000HP V16's ,all 2 stroke ,all blown by the biggest GM blowers you'll ever see!!!
    There are old cars and then there are classics...Mercedes Benz.

  15. #45
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Get a cheap turbo and a air box ,mount the turbo under the wheel well like a cold air intake , use compressed air to run the turbo and use it like u would N2o,all u need special is the little flapper thingy in the air tract so when it comes under pressure it closes off the outside air and uses the turbo air untill pressure drops back off and then the flapper releases and u go back to the outside air!!!!!!! sorta a sleeper setup!!!!!and if u figure how little air pressure the exaust actually puts out u can see that compressed air will give u much much more than a normal motor can handle This would be a really hot setup if u used it in say cali where N2o is illegal on the street.All I can say is hold on because this isnt going to come on slowly like a turbo normally spools ,this thing will go till u blow the head gaskett off or limit the air with a regulator.This is experimental and as with exsperiments it could get outa hand pretty quickly I would be thinkin safety safety safety!!!!!!!!I think this will fall in the catagory of home brew for u and actually work!!!!Like most things home brewed ,there is almost always a way to do this more easily ,and more efficiently,but probably not any cheaper.Just though I would give a idea to cobble on that would produce some impressive gains for all that effort.U will see this applied to alot of turbo cars here soon,normal turbo installations using compressed air to spool the turbo on the line and leave under full boost
    Last edited by shawnlee28; 04-26-2005 at 07:09 AM.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink