Thread: Check out my "rear" . . .
-
09-13-2005 12:40 PM #1
Check out my "rear" . . .
So I inherited a 1955 Ford wagon from my farther-in-law over two years ago, it’s had some body work done and a re-paint, and a drive line transplant (not done by him or me). The drive line was changed to a “carbed” 302 with a C-6 tranny. The problem is I’m pretty sure the rear end is the stock one, possibly a 7.5” ?!?! Also, there is no “access cover” in the back of the pumpkin. Does anybody now what size the stock rear end could be in a 55’ Ford wagon ? I believe the original drive line was a 272 with a 3 on the tree. The rear end gear is very steep, and not so great for highway driving if you know what I mean ! I’m sure it would be best for me to yank the whole rear end out, and replace it with a 9”, but who has the best deals on a complete rear end ?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Mr. BSome of the best things in life are free, but so are the wost things !
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
09-13-2005 01:24 PM #2
No rear cover, '55 Ford wagon, I think you already have a 9" that is a sought after width etc. Check a couple of pictures on the net of 9" Ford rears and I bet your's matches, if so you can change center sections (pumpkin) or replace ring and pinion.
Also, body style not mtr. dictated rear size.Less weight more speed; there's no substitute for cubic inches; If it don't go-chrome it
-
09-13-2005 01:30 PM #3
I don't think the 9" showed up 'til '57.
As far as complete 9" units, here are 2 of the most respected builders...
http://www.currieenterprises.com/
http://www.moserengineering.com/Last edited by techinspector1; 09-13-2005 at 01:33 PM.
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
09-13-2005 04:00 PM #4
I am pretty sure that the 55 Ford Conv. I owned had a 9". I always thought it to be stock. I changed the pumpkin on two occasions, it was certainly a dropout. Mind you this was in 61/62 so it would seem odd that it would have been swapped.
-
09-13-2005 04:07 PM #5
If itis indeed a 9 inch it aint stock for anything before 57. It could be a 8 inch out of a maverick or granada.Choose your battles well===If it dont go chrome it
-
09-13-2005 05:37 PM #6
to get the ratio, put the rear up on jacks, and take the wheels and drums off. Spin the drive shaft, and verify the axles rotate together. Make a mark for 'top' on the pinion and one of the axles. Start spinning the pinion with a helper watching the axle. Keep count of the turns until your helper tells you the axle has returned to its start mark ( exactly ) Compare numbers with your helper and do the math to reduce it to a ratio..
Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
EG
-
09-14-2005 05:58 AM #7
If it's a stock 57 it had a 9" from the factory.Don Meyer, PhD-Mech Engr(48 GMC Trk/chopped/cab extended/caddy fins & a GM converted Rolls Royce Silver Shadow).
-
09-16-2005 06:59 AM #8
Thanks for the info . . .
I'm going to take a closer look this weekend at my local car cruise at cars with 9" rears. Maybe I can see a difference ?!?! If I get a chance, I'll post some pics of what I have under the wagon. (Both front and back.)
Talk back at ya in a bit . . .
Thanks again !Some of the best things in life are free, but so are the wost things !
A man was watching his wife as she prepared to fry sausages in a pan. He noticed that before placing the sausages in the pan, she always cut off both ends, threw them away, and cooked only the middle...
the Official CHR joke page duel