Thread: selecting motor- SBC or SBF
-
10-05-2005 09:38 AM #1
51 ford sedan- selecting motor- SBC or SBF
I just picked up a 1951 Ford sedan. The car will have a M-II front clip. The guy who is installing it for me has asked me what motor + trans I plan to put in it. I was debating between a small block chevy (350 probably) or a small block ford (5.0 or 4.6). I was thinking also about going with a fuel injected motor (maybe out of a newer mustang or camaro). Any reason I should go one way or the other? Or is it just personal preference at this point? Any way easier or cheaper? Does one brand have a better tranny to choose from (auto)?Last edited by fusion_ta66; 10-05-2005 at 09:52 AM.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
10-05-2005 11:36 AM #2
Chevy's are cheaper to overhaul and hop up. That said, I wouldn't put one in a Ford. My choice would be (surprise!) a 351 Windsor!
-
10-05-2005 12:18 PM #3
I would go with a stroked 5-0 but thats JMO.
-
10-05-2005 12:32 PM #4
Yep 302 or Windsor.Choose your battles well===If it dont go chrome it
-
10-05-2005 12:45 PM #5
Good question and just in time. I'm building a 30 Ford coupe and had planned on putting my 350 w/700r4 in it but I just found out a friend of mine has a 70's something 302 w/auto in a van. The van is trash but the engine runs good. I've always been a GM man but thought the Ford tradition would stay alive with the 302 and also break away from the mainstream by going with the 302. I like the fact that the distributor is up front on the 302 so it's easy to get to. I think, as a result, there is more junk on the front of the engine setting it back further...I think, like I say I'm not a Ford man. The tranny would be a 3 speed as opposed to my 4 speed 700r4. If you run a high gear 8 or 9 inch Ford rearend, then that would change driveability quite a bit. Any other ideas?
-
10-05-2005 01:11 PM #6
Well IMO I like to keep Ford in a Ford and Chevy in a Chevy. Chevy are much cheap to build in the end. If you want to go with a 302 then a 302 and a nicely built C4 tranny is a good choice. The C6's in a 302 are way to big and heavy and not needed. If you have a heavy car then a 351 Windsor is a better choice because I have a 302 in a 66 F100 and I have to push that motor hard to get it going real good. I mean, yeah it will smoke the tires, etc but if I had a 351 I wouldn't have to push it as hard and get the same results. So if you want a 351 then get a C6 behind it. They even have stroker kits for a 351 to make a 427 if wanted as well.www.streamlineautocare.com
If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!
-
10-05-2005 01:18 PM #7
Originally posted by Aster
Good question and just in time. I'm building a 30 Ford coupe and had planned on putting my 350 w/700r4 in it but I just found out a friend of mine has a 70's something 302 w/auto in a van. The van is trash but the engine runs good. I've always been a GM man but thought the Ford tradition would stay alive with the 302 and also break away from the mainstream by going with the 302. I like the fact that the distributor is up front on the 302 so it's easy to get to. I think, as a result, there is more junk on the front of the engine setting it back further...I think, like I say I'm not a Ford man. The tranny would be a 3 speed as opposed to my 4 speed 700r4. If you run a high gear 8 or 9 inch Ford rearend, then that would change driveability quite a bit. Any other ideas?www.streamlineautocare.com
If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!
-
10-05-2005 03:14 PM #8
Put a Ford in your Ford. I'd go with a 4.6L, a 351W or a 460. 460 are cheap and have a variety of parts for them. If you go the 4.6L route, get a DOHC.---Tom
1964 Studebaker Commander
1964 Studebaker Daytona
-
10-05-2005 07:07 PM #9
Stock cubes are much cheaper than stroker kits. A 302 has the same bore as a 351W, so what possible advantage would there be to a 347? Unless you're trying to fool someone into thinking its still a 302.
-
10-05-2005 07:23 PM #10
Well, if I go GM, its no cost because I already have it. 350/700r4. The Ford stuff I would have to buy.....hummmmm. The Ford thing sounds good but the bank account is already stretched thinner than a nats ear over a rain barrel. Oh well, unless the 302 guy makes me a hell of a deal, I think I better stay with the GM stuff. Thanks for the creative ideas. Makes for a good mind build.
-
10-05-2005 08:23 PM #11
Noone ever said you couldn't out the GM stuff in it for now and start slowly building a Ford motor and tranny on a stand in the meantime as money and time allows. That is what I am going to do with the 351W and C6 tranny I want to put in this 66 one day in about 2 years or less.www.streamlineautocare.com
If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!
-
10-05-2005 09:20 PM #12
I'm building a t-bucket with a stoked, blown 302 and a t-5 and have to agree with the Ford in a Ford motto. Having said that, Rodding is all about doing what seems right to you. On a comparison note, the Ford small block is about 50 pounds lighter than a GM. Does that outweigh the cost differences in a buildup? Not likely. If you're looking for something a little different, think about a double overhead cam 4.6.... Say out of a Lincoln Mark VIII. The 92's came stock at about 265hp and the later years picked up somewhere around 25-30hp over that. Really wind it up and stroke IT (I've seen some new stroker kits for them). I have a Mark VIII and can't wait for the wife to tire of it so I can steal that motor..... It's WAY too much fun!
-
10-05-2005 09:29 PM #13
Have any pictures of your T Bucket? Sounds awsome.www.streamlineautocare.com
If you wan't something done right, then you have to do it yourself!
-
10-06-2005 05:12 AM #14
Originally posted by Aster
Well, if I go GM, its no cost because I already have it. 350/700r4. The Ford stuff I would have to buy.....hummmmm. The Ford thing sounds good but the bank account is already stretched thinner than a nats ear over a rain barrel. Oh well, unless the 302 guy makes me a hell of a deal, I think I better stay with the GM stuff. Thanks for the creative ideas. Makes for a good mind build.Ed ke6bnl@juno.com
1963 Ford Econoline 5 window
1950 Ford F1 pu
1948 Ford F3 pu
1953 Chevy 3100 AD
1970 Chevy Short bed c10
1972 El Camino chopped top
-
10-06-2005 07:46 AM #15
One more thing to consider is that the Ford 5.0 is couple of inches narrower than the SBC. Depending on what steering box setup you end up with you will have more clearance with the Ford motor and thus more options for headers. Im putting a 351W in my '49 with MII.
Beautiful work, that is one nice and well built car!
55 Wagon Progress